Skip to main content

Community-Based Forest Management in Arcata, California

  • Chapter
Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration

Part of the book series: Society for Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

  • 3173 Accesses

Abstract

The Arcata Community Forest, established in 1955, comprises 2,150 acres of secondgrowth redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) forest near Humboldt Bay in Humboldt County, California (fig. 8.1).While redwood is the iconic northern coastal California tree, the community forest also contains other conifers such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), grand fir (Abies grandis), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). Management for the community forest is guided by the City of Arcata (population 16,900) government leaders, the City’s technical advisory committee, and local citizens, all of whom have expressed commitments to a sustainable management program that serves as a model of a managed forest for demonstration and educational purposes. Through volunteer activities, the citizenry is involved in an adaptive management approach to increase biodiversity, accelerate old-forest conditions, provide late-successional forest habitat, and sequester carbon while providing revenue. Timber harvest revenues fund forest operations, habitat restoration, and open space and parkland acquisitions. Community forestry in Arcata is designed to provide local residents the opportunity and responsibility to manage their natural resources. In environmentally minded Arcata, manipulation of the forest by variousmeans, including timber harvesting, has been socially acceptable due to the ecological soundness of the project goals, confidence in the Forest Management Committee, and the visible results of almost thirty years of treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belous, B. 1984. “Restoration among the Redwoods.” Restoration & Management Notes 2 (2): 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D., and E. A. Howell, eds. 2001. The Historical Ecology Handbook: A Restorationist’s Guide to Reference Ecosystems.Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., D. R. Berg, D. A. Thornburgh, and J. C. Tappeiner. 1997. “Alternative Silvicultural Approaches to Timber Harvesting: Variable Retention Harvest Systems.” In Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management, edited by K. A. Kohm and J. F. Franklin, 111–39.Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gann, G. D., and D. Lamb, eds. 2006. Ecological Restoration: A Means of Conserving Biodiversity and Sustaining Livelihoods (version 1.1). Tucson, Arizona, and Gland, Switzerland: Society for Ecological Restoration International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, M., E. Reuter, and T. Robards. 2005. “Growth of Redwood and Douglas-Fir Leave Trees Using Variable Retention.” California Forestry Note No. 119. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, S. L. 1984. “Redwood Creek Estuary.” Restoration & Management Notes 2 (2): 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. J., and W. J. Beese. 2002. “The Retention System: Reconciling Variable Retention with the Principles of Silvicultural Systems.” The Forestry Chronicle 78 (3): 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, T. A., J. Cissel, J. F. Franklin, F. Swanson, N. Poage, R. Pabst, J. Tappeiner, and L. Winter. 2002. Summary of Workshop on Development of Old-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests along the Pacific Coast of North America: A Regional Perspective. November 7–9, 2001. Blue River, OR: H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillett, S. C., R. Van Pelt, G.W. Koch, A. R. Ambrose, A. L. Carroll,M. E. Antoine, and B.M. Mifsud. 2010. “Increasing Wood Production through Old Age in Tall Trees.” Forest Ecology and Management 259 (5): 976–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kirk, S. 1985. “A History of the Arcata Community Forest.” Unpublished research paper. Arcata, CA: Humboldt County Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wycoff, B. 2005. Growth Rings: Communities and Trees. Aspen, CO: The Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Andre .

Editor information

Dave Egan Evan E. Hjerpe Jesse Abrams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andre, M.S. (2011). Community-Based Forest Management in Arcata, California. In: Egan, D., Hjerpe, E.E., Abrams, J. (eds) Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-039-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships