Skip to main content

Collaboration: A Catalyst for Restoration

  • Chapter
Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration

Part of the book series: Society for Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

The Joseph Creek watershed, in remote and rural Wallowa County, Oregon, begins in the rolling hill country north of the county’s main agricultural valley before dropping through deeply dissected canyon terrain on its way to the Grande Ronde River. Once an important fishing site for the Wallowa Band of the Nez Perce, and later the setting for extensive homesteading, agricultural development, livestock grazing, and commercial logging operations by Euro-American settlers and their descendants, Joseph Creek today is the site of innovation in community-based ecological restoration. This chapter describes how rural community members responded to sudden changes in their ability to access and benefit from local lands by taking a lead role ingathering information about, and setting priorities for, ecological restoration needs. Doing so required extensive collaboration across traditional jurisdictional boundaries as well as across traditionally adversarial interests. The case of the Upper Joseph Creek Watershed Assessment demonstrates that national interests in ecological restoration can be constructively met through the active engagement of people at the local level. Aligning restoration goals with local benefits helped to foster community engagement, creative problem solving, and sustained interest and dedication in achieving restoration outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Marshall, A. G. 1977. “Nez Perce Social Groups: An Ecological Interpretation.” PhD diss., Washington State University, Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on Protection and Management of Pacific Northwest Anadromous Salmonids. 1996. Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., and P. S. White. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage, S. A. 2001. “(Re)claiming Space and Place through Collaborative Planning in Rural Oregon.” Political Geography 20: 839–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. E. 1967.Mutual Cross-Utilization of Economic Resources in the Plateau: An Example from Aboriginal Nez Perce Fishing Practices. Washington State University Laboratory of Anthropology Report Investigations. Pullman: Washington State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils D. Christoffersen .

Editor information

Dave Egan Evan E. Hjerpe Jesse Abrams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christoffersen, N.D. (2011). Collaboration: A Catalyst for Restoration. In: Egan, D., Hjerpe, E.E., Abrams, J. (eds) Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-039-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships