Skip to main content

Ecological Restoration across Landscapes of Politics, Policy, and Property

  • Chapter
Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration

Part of the book series: Society for Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

Humanity—society and its institutions—plays a key role in the future viability of the biosphere. Only by managing ourselves, our resource consumption, our waste, our economies and environment as a whole, can we hope to “manage” the environment and its abundant resources toward a sustainable, healthy, and restorative future. Unfortunately, political reelections and the politics of environmental restoration often seem to be at juxtapositions. The fast-moving variables of economics and reelection generally reign supreme over their slower, foundational, and interdependent ecological components (Carpenter and Turner 2001). The scales of time and space and the constituency of voters generally don’t line up, and, as a result, political and ecological concerns are often misinterpreted as rivals rather than essentials.1 Similarly, planning for the development of land and other resource use often conflicts with maintaining ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and ecological restoration requirements. To make matters more confusing, the policies and programs of different government agencies appear to contradict each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A., and E. Ostrom. 2006. “Political Science and Conservation Biology: A Dialog of the Deaf.” Conservation Biology 20 (3): 681–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., and S. Low, eds. 1992. Place Attachment. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. R., R. Plummer, F. Berkes, R. I. Arthur, A. T. Charles, I. J. Davidson-Hunt, A. P. Diduck, N. Doubleday, D. S. Johnson, M. Marschke, P. McConney, E. Pinkerton, and E. Wollenberg. 2009. “Adaptive Co-management for Social-ecological Complexity.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7 (2): 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., and C. Folke, eds. 2000. Linking Social and Ecological Systems:Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J. 2000. Bioregional Planning: Resource Management Beyond the New Millennium. London and Amsterdam: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J. 2003. “Forming Common Property Resource Management Institutions.” Journal of Ecological Management and Restoration 4 (1): 72–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J. 2005. “Integration Research for Shaping Sustainable Regional Landscapes.” Journal of Research Practice 1 (2): Article M7. http://jrp/icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/16/28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J. 2010. “Landscapes Shaped by People and Place Institutions Require a New Conservation Agenda.” Bio Science 60 (8): 569–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J., P. Bridgewater, and P. Parker. 1997. “The UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Program Comes of Age: Learning by Doing, Landscape Models for a Sustainable Conservation and Resource.” In Conservation Outside Reserves, edited by P. Hale and D. Lamb, 176–82. Brisbane: Center for Conservation Biology, University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J., P. Coop, and I. Reeve. 2006. “Eco-civic Optimisation: A Nested Framework for Planning and Managing Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 75: 265–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J., and G. Marshall. 2007. “Designing Robust Common Property Regimes for Collaboration towards Rural Sustainability.” In Sustainable Resource Use: Institutional Dynamics and Economics, edited by S. Larson and A. Smajgl, 179–207. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunckhorst, D. J., I. Reeve, P. Morley, and K. Bock. 2008. “Strategic Spatial Governance: Deriving Social-Ecological Frameworks for Managing Landscapes and Regions.” In Landscape Analysis and Visualisation: Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning, edited by C. Pettit, B. Cartwright, I. Bishop, K. Lowell, D. Pullar, and D. Duncan, 253–76. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., and M. Turner. 2001. “Hares and Tortoises: Interactions of Fast and Slow Variables in Ecosystems.” Ecosystems 3 (6): 495–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jager, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” Proceedings National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100 (14): 8086–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. S., L. E. Kruger, and S. E. Daniels. 2003. “‘Place’ as an Integrating Concept in Natural Resource Politics: Propositions for a Social Science Research Agenda.” Society and Natural Resources 16: 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. 1996. “Ecological Economics: Reintegrating the Study of Humans and Nature.” Ecological Applications 6: 978–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crumley, C. L., and W. H. Marquardt, eds. 1987. Regional Dynamics: Burgundian Landscapes in Historical Perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., C. S. Holling, and C. Perrings. 1996. “Biological Diversity, Ecosystems and the Human Scale.” Ecological Applications 6: 1018–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyfogle, E. 2003. The Land We Share: Private Property and the Common Good. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster, P. H., and R. Hull, eds. 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, T., and L. Garkovich. 1994. “Landscapes: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment.” Rural Sociology 59 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light, eds. 1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1968. “Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162: 1243–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. N., F. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene, eds. 1999. Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R., and P. Landres, eds. 1998. Stewardship across Boundaries. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R., and C. White, eds. 2009. Conservation for a New Generation: Redefining Natural Resources Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. 2008. “Nesting, Subsidiarity, and Community-Based Environmental Governance beyond the Local Scale.” International Journal of the Commons 2 (1): 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M., ed. 1999. Polycentric Governance and Development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. U. Weber, eds. 2002. The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, D., M. Taquino, S. M. Grice, and D. A. Gill. 2004. “Civic Responsibility and the Environment: Linking Local Conditions to Community Environmental Activeness.” Society and Natural Resources 17 (2): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. 1973. Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfueller, S. 2008. “Role of Bioregionalism in Bookmark Biosphere Reserve, Australia.” Environmental Conservation 35: 173–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E. 2003. “Towards Specificity in Complexity: Understanding Co-management from a Social Science Perspective.” In The Fisheries Co-management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects, edited by D. C. Wilson, J. R. Nielsen, and P. Degnbol, 61–78. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, R., and D. Armitage. 2007. “Crossing Boundaries, Crossing Scales: The Evolution of Environment and Resource Co-management.” Geography Compass 1 (4): 834–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, C. 2009. “Institutional Dimensions of Co-management: Participation, Power and Process.” Society and Natural Resources 22: 230–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, C., M. Buechner, R. Sauvajot, and B. A. Wilcox. 1992. “Cross-Boundary Management between National Parks and Surrounding Lands: A Review and Discussion.” Environmental Management 16 (2): 273–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, M. 1998. “Understanding Social Organizations and Institutions.” In River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, edited by R. Naiman and R. Bilby, 529–551. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, R. 2003. “Is It Really Just a Social Construction? The Contribution of the Physical Environment to Sense of Place.” Society and Natural Resources 16: 671–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., and D. Salt. 2006. Resilience Thinking. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S., D. Brunckhorst, and G. Kelly. 2003. Reinventing the Commons: Cross Boundary Farming for a Sustainable Future. London: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Brunckhorst .

Editor information

Dave Egan Evan E. Hjerpe Jesse Abrams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brunckhorst, D. (2011). Ecological Restoration across Landscapes of Politics, Policy, and Property. In: Egan, D., Hjerpe, E.E., Abrams, J. (eds) Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-039-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships