Skip to main content

Abstract

Increases in human developments, travel, and trade greatly facilitate the movement of organisms to locations where they do not naturally occur (Mack and Lonsdale 2001). These organisms are called nonnative species, andexotic, alien, introduced, andnonindigenousare common synonyms for this term. Once a nonnative species is introduced to a new area, it may no longer be susceptible to the population controls that coevolved with it in its native habitat. In some cases, nonnative species may have a benign relationship with native species, resulting in little effect on ecosystem processes. In other cases, the nonnative species may have a competitive advantage over native species and spread quickly, becoming invasive. Excluding cultivars, 10–20 percent of the estimated 50,000 nonnative species introduced to the United States (Pimentel et al.2005) will become invasive (Chornesky and Randall 2003). Invasive species affect native species by direct competition and by indirectly altering ecosystem processes such as food webs, hydrology, nutrient and decomposition cycles, and natural disturbance regimes (Vitousek et al.1997a, 1997b; Mack et al.2000; Mooney et al. 2005). Most invasions detrimentally affect the environment, human health, or the economy, and in some cases native species are extirpated or become extinct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, S. 1995. Rare plants protect cape’s water supplies. New Scientist 145:8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashkin, M., T. J. Stohlgren, Y. Otsuki, M. Lee, P. Evangelista, and J. Belnap. 2003. Soil characteristics and plant exotic species invasions in the Grand Staircase- Escalante National Monument, Utah, USA. Applied Soil Ecology 22:67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, C. C., and J. M. Baskin, eds. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, E., P. Evangelista, T. J. Stohlgren, and N. Alley. 2007. Invasive species and coal bed methane development in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 128:381–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, W. H., R. W. Knight, and J. L. Schuster. 1982. Saltcedar influence on sedimentation in the Brazos River. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37:298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, T. S., and A. Spingarn. 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Conservation Biology 6:91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, K. A., K. W. Stolte, and T. J. Stohlgren. 1998. Forest health monitoring: Vegetation pilot field methods guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, D. E., and S. D. Smith. 1995. Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern U.S. Ecological Monographs 65:347–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J. G., and J. D. Brotherson. 1982. Comparisons of sites infested and not infested with saltcedar (Tamarix pendandra) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus an-gustifolia). Weed Science 30:360–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chornesky, E. A., and J. M. Randall. 2003. The threat of invasive alien species to biological diversity: Setting a future course. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90:67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleverly, J. R., S. D. Smith, A. Sala, and D. A. Devitt. 1997. Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mojave Desert floodplain: The role of drought. Oecologia 111:12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, J. A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12:316–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C. M., ed. 2000. Fire, plant invasions, and global changes. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C. M., T. L. Dudley, and M. C. Mack, eds. 1999. Disturbance and biological invasions: Direct effects and feedback. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C. M., and S. E. Hobbie, eds. 2005. Plant species effects on ecosystem processes: Insights from invasive species. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C. M., J. M. Levine, and M. Thomsen. 2001. Ecosystem resistance to invasion and the role of propagule supply: A California perspective. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 2:233–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C. M., and L. A. Meyerson. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restoration Ecology 10:703–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, C. M., and P. M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 23:63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso, J. M. 1998. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technology 12:326–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso, J. M., G. B. Kyser, and C. B. Pirosko. 2003. Effect of light and density on yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) root growth and soil moisture use. Weed Science 51:334–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. 1958. The ecology of invasions by plants and animals. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, P. H., S. Kumar, T. J. Stohlgren, C. S. Jarnevich, A. W. Crall, J. B. Norman, and D. T. Barnett. 2008. Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Diversity and Distributions 14:808–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, P., T. J. Stohlgren, D. Guenther, and S. Stewart. 2004. Vegetation response to fire and postburn seeding treatments in juniper woodlands of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah. Western North American Naturalist 64:293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J., ed. 1986. Invasibility: Lessons from south Florida. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayer, W. E., and G. M. Furnival. 1999. Forest survey sampling designs: A history. Journal of Forestry 97:4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelbard, J. L., and J. Belnap. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conservation Biology 17:420–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R. 1966. Recent plant invasions in arid and semi-arid Southwest of the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 56:408–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. S. 1977. The development and perpetuation of the permanent Tamarisk type in the phreatophyte zone of the Southwest. General Technical Report RM43. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huenneke, L. F., S. P. Hamburg, R. Koide, H. A. Mooney, and P. M. Vitousek. 1990. Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in California serpentine grassland. Ecology 71:478–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. R., and N. E. West. 1979. Riparian tree species distribution and succession along the Lower Escalante River, Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 24:331–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiritani, K., and K. Yamamura, eds. 2003. Exotic insects and their pathways for invasion. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:386–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., and C. M. D’Antonio. 1999. Elton revisited: A review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., M. Vila, C. M. D’Antonio, J. S. Dukes, K. Grigulis, and S. Lavorel. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 270:775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:133–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M., S. Williams, H. J. MacIsaac, K. R. Hayes, B. Leung, S. Reichard, R. N. Mack, et al. 2006. Biological invasions: Recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecological Applications 16:2035–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W. M., and A. M. Lane. 1994. Tourist vehicles as vectors of weed seeds in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Biological Conservation 69:277– 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozon, J. D., and H. J. MacIsaac. 1997. Biological invasions: Are they dependent on disturbance? Environmental Reviews 5:131–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N., ed. 1986. Alien plant invasion into the intermountain West: A case history. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N., and W. M. Lonsdale. 2001. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. BioScience 51:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, D. M., A. Mayfield, and N. H. Poritz. 1985. Distribution of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Science 33:315–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. L. 2002. Do human activities raise species richness? Contrasting patterns in United States plants and fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H. A., R. N. Mack, J. A. McNeely, L. E. Neville, P. J. Schei, and J. K. Waage. 2005. Invasive alien species: A new synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, N., ed. 1995. Vascular plants of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, L. E., J. T. Kartesz, and L. S. Kutner. 1995. Native vascular plants. Pages 205–209 in E. T. LaRoe, G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac, eds. Our living resources: A report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals and ecosystems. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, P. A. 1978. Insects of American chestnut: Possible importance and conservation concern. Pages 83–85 in J. McDonald, W. L., F. C. Cech, J. Luchock, and C. Smith, eds. Proceedings of the American Chestnut Symposium. Morgantown: West Virginia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. J. 1972. Spread of African pasture grasses to American tropics. Journal of Range Management 25:12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52:273–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinay, G., A. Fabre, P. Vervier, and F. Gazelle. 1992. Control of C, N, P distribution in soils of riparian forests. Landscape Ecology 6:121–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pysek, P., and D. M. Richardson. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand? Pages 97–125 in W. Nentwig, ed. Biological invasions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahel, F. J. 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technology 10:370–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek, M., D. M. Richardson, S. I. Higgins, M. J. Pitcairn, and E. Grotkopp. 2005. Ecology of invasive plants: State of the art. Pages 104–61 in H. A. Mooney, R. N. Mack, J. A. McNeely, L. E. Neville, P. J. Schei, and J. K. Waage, eds. Invasive alien species: Searching for solutions. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C. A., M. S. Ellis, and J. H. Bullock, Jr. 2000. Water co-produced with coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming: Preliminary composition data. Open file report 00-372. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roane, M. K., G. J. Griffin, and J. R. Elkins. 1986. Chestnut blight, and other En-dothia diseases, and the genus Endothia. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopatho-logical Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, spread, and aerial extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states. Professional paper 491-A. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sather, N. 1992. Element stewardship abstract for Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle). Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. 1989. Plant dispersal by motor cars. Vegetatio 80:147–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and P. Stiling. 1996. Risks of species introduced for biological control. Biological Conservation 78:185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, T., P. D. McLoughlin, D. Hervieux, E. Dzus, J. Nolan, B. Wynes, and S. Boutin. 2008. Determining sustainable levels of cumulative effects for boreal caribou. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:900–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J., D. T. Barnett, and J. Kartesz. 2003. The rich get richer: Patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller, W., D. M. Richardson, M. Rouget, S. Proches, and J. R. U. Wilson. 2006. Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87:1755–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: A search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak, S. C., and C. A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14:18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: Towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., L. R. Walker, L. D. Whiteaker, D. Muellerdombois, and P. A. Mat-son. 1987. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West, N. E. 1983. Western intermountain sagebrush steppe. Pages 351–69 in N. E. West, ed. Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrooks, R. G. 2004. New approaches for early detection and rapid response to invasive plants in the United States. Weed Technology 18:1468–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant, S. G. 1990. Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: Ecological and management implications. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-276. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, L., S. N. Miller, and E. T. Schmidtmann. 2006. Mosquito larval habitat mapping using remote sensing and GIS: Implications of coalbed methane development and West Nile virus. Journal of Medical Entomology 43:1034–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David E. Naugle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evangelista, P.H., Crall, A.W., Bergquist, E. (2011). Invasive Plants and Their Response to Energy Development. In: Naugle, D.E. (eds) Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation in Western North America. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-022-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships