Abstract
Human populations depend for their survival and well-being on benefits derived from ecosystems, also called ecosystem services (MA 2003). The nature, magnitude, and reliability of the services provided by a certain ecosystem depend on its particular characteristics, the human group that interacts with it, and the nature of their interaction (MA 2003; Maass et al. 2005). The ability of an ecosystem to provide services depends on its processes—that is, the interactions between its physical and biotic components—and the rates and variability over time and space of such processes and components (Kremen 2005). The benefits people obtain from ecosystems also depend on demographic, economic, political, cultural, scientific, and technological characteristics of the human groups that interact with the ecosystem (MA 2003; Castillo et al. 2005). Human groups determine which services they demand, extract, or expect from ecosystems and thus drive decisions about how to manage them (MA 2003; Bennet and Balvanera 2007). Given the tight relationship between the delivery of ecosystem services and human well-being, the long-term maintenance of the capacity of ecosystems to provide services is essential to ensure a promising future for humanity. Indeed, technical and social interventions need to be designed to foster the maintenance of the services to ensure human well-being (MA 2003).
References
Anbumozhi, V., J. Radhakrishnan, and E. Yamaji. 2005. Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality and associated management considerations. Ecological Engineering 24: 517–23.
Arambiza, E., and M. Painter. 2006. Biodiversity conservation and the quality of life of indigenous people in the Bolivian Chaco. Human Organization 65: 20–34.
Bennet, E.M., and P. Balvanera. 2007. The future of production systems in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities in the Americas. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 191–98.
Blauert, J., and S. Zadeck. 1999. Mediación para la Sustentabilidad, Construyendo Políticas desde las Bases. Mexico: Plaza y Valdés, British Council, IDS Sussex, CIESAS.
Cámara Forestal de Bolivia. 2006. Certifcación Forestal. Sector Forestal. Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
Castillo, A., A. Magaña, A. Pujadas, L. Martínez, and C. Godínez. 2005. Undertanding the interaction of rural people with ecosystems: A case study in a tropical dry forest of Mexico. Ecosystems 8: 630–43.
Castillo, A., and V.M. Toledo. 2000. Applying ecology in the third world: The case of Mexico. BioScience 50: 66–76.
Challenger, A. 1998. Utilización y Conservación de los Ecosistemas Terrestres de México. Pasado, Presente y Futuro. México, D.F.: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.
Chivaura-Mususa, C., B. Campbell, and W. Kenyon. 2000. The value of mature trees in arable fields in the smallholder sector, Zimbabwe. Ecological Economics 33: 395–400.
Coelho, L.M., J.L. Pereira, N. Calegario, and M. Lopes. 2006. Análise Longitudinal dos Preços do Carvão Vegetal, no Estado de Minas Gerais. árvore 30: 429–38.
Colunga-García Marín, P., J. Coello-Coello, L. Espejo-Peniche, et al. 1993. Agave studies in Yucatan, Mexico. I. Past and present germplasm diversity and uses. Economic Botany 47: 328–340.
Dalle, S.P., S. De Blois, J. Caballero, and T. Johns. 2006. Integrating analyses of local land-use regulations, cultural perceptions and land-use/land cover data for assessing the success of community-based conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 222: 370–83.
Díaz, S., J. Fargione, F.S. Chapin III, and D. Tilman. 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biology 4: e277, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.
Fearnside, P.M. 2001. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation 28: 23–38.
Filoso, S., L.A. Martinelli, R.W. Howarth, E.W. Boyer, and F. Dentener. 2006. Human activities changing the nitrogen cycle in Brazil. Biogeochemistry 79: 61–89.
Galicia, L., J. López-Blanco, A.E. Zarco-Arista, V. Filip, and F. García-Oliva. 1999. The relationship between solar radiation interception and soil water content in a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Catena 36: 153–64.
García-Oliva, F., E. Ezcurra, and L. Galicia. 1991. Patterns of rainfall distribution in the central Pacifc coast of Mexico. Geografska Annaler Series A, Physical Geography 73: 179–86.
Grau, H.R., N.I. Gasparri, and T.M. Aide. 2005. Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of north‐west Argentina. Environmental Conservation 32: 140–48.
Hewitt, W. P. 1994. Hierve el Agua, Mexico: Its water and its corn‐growing potential. Latin American Antiquity 5: 177–81.
Hoffmann, W.A., and R.B. Jackson. 2000. Vegetation‐climate feedbacks in the conversion of tropical savanna to grassland. Journal of Climate 13: 1593–1602.
Holbrook, N.M., J.L. Whitbeck, and H.A. Mooney. 1995. Drought responses of Neotropical dry forest trees. In Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests, ed. S.H. Bullock, H.A. Mooney, and E. Medina, 243–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report, ed. R.T. Watson and the Core Writing Team. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaramillo, V.J., J.B. Kauffman, L. Rentería-Rodríguez, D.L. Cummings, and L.J. Elling-son. 2003. Biomass, carbon, and nitrogen pools in Mexican tropical dry forest landscapes. Ecosystems 6: 609–29.
Kerr, A.M., and A.H. Baird. 2007. Natural barriers to natural disasters. BioScience 57: 102–3.
Klink, C.A., and R.B. Machado. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology 19: 707–13.
Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters 8: 468–79.
Lawrence, D., and W.H. Schlesinger. 2001. Changes in soil phosphorus during 200 years of shifting cultivation in Indonesia. Ecology 82: 2769–80.
Lopes, P.S.N., J.C. Souza, P. Rebelles, J. Mendes, and I.D. Ferreira. 2003. Caracterização do Ataque da Broca dos Frutos do Pequizeiro. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 25: 540–43.
López-Tapia, D.M. 2008. Elaboración de criterios para la restauración de la Cuenca del Río Cuitzmala, Jalisco, con base en un análisis de agua. MA diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Lorente-Adame, R.G., and L.R. Sánchez-Velásquez. 1996. Dinámica Estacional del Banco de Frutos del Teocintle Zea diploperennis (Gramineae). Biotropica 28: 267–72.
Maass, J.M., P. Balvanera, A. Castillo, G.C. Daily, H.A. Mooney, P. Ehrlich, M. Que-sada, A. Miranda, V.J. Jaramillo, F. García-Oliva, A. Martínez-Yrizar, H. Cotler, J. López-Blanco, J.A. Pérez-Jiménez, A. Búrquez, C. Tinoco, G. Ceballos, L. Bar-raza, R. Ayala, and J. Sarukhán. 2005. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: Insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacifc coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society 10: 17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art17.
Maass, J.M., C. Jordan, and J. Sarukhán. 1988. Soil erosion and nutrient losses in seasonal tropical agroecosystems under various management techniques. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 595–607.
Martínez-Ballesté, A., C. Martorell, and J. Caballero. 2006. Cultural or ecological sus-tainability? The effect of cultural change on sabal palm management among the lowland Maya of Mexico. Ecology and Society 11: 27.
Masera, O., A. Ghillardi, R. Drigo, and M. Trossero. 2006. Wisdom: A GIS-based supply demand mapping tool for woodfuel management. Biomass and Bioenergy 30: 618–37.
Miles, L., A.C. Newton, R.S. DeFries, C. Ravilious, I. May, S. Blyth, V. Kapos, and J.E. Gordon. 2006. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. Journal of Biogeography 33: 491–505.
Oliveira, A.R., R.A. Norton, and G.J. Des‐Moraes. 2005. Edaphic and plant inhabiting oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) from Cerrado and Mata Atlantica ecosystems in the state of Sao Paulo, southeast Brazil. Zootaxa 1049: 49–68.
Ortega, A.T. 1995. El desarrollo socioeconómico de Jalisco. Perspectivas de recursos naturales. Revista Universidad de Guadalajara 41–48.
Ostrom, E., J. Burger, C.B. Field, R.B. Norgaard, and D. Policansky. 1999. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science 284: 278–82.
Pariona, W., T.S. Fredericksen, and J.C. Licona. 2003. Natural regeneration and liberation of timber species in logging gaps in two Bolivian tropical forests. Forest Ecology and Management 181: 313–22.
Quesada, M., and K.E. Stoner. 2004. Threats to the conservation of the tropical dry forest in Costa Rica. In Biodiversity Conservation in Costa Rica: Learning the Lessons in a Seasonal Dry Forest, ed. G.W. Frankie, A. Mata, and S.B. Vinson, 266–80. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ratter, J.A., J.F. Ribeiro, and S. Bridgewater. 1997. The Brazilian Cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity. Annals of Botany 80: 223–30.
Segura, G., P. Balvanera, E. Durán, and A. Peréz. 2003. Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Plant Ecology 169: 259–71.
SEMARNAT. 2006. Estrategia de Educación Ambiental para la Sustentabilidad en México. México, D.F.: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT).
Steininger, M.K., C.J. Tucker, P. Ersts, J. Killeen, Z. Villegas, and S.B. Hecht. 2001. Clearance and fragmentation of tropical deciduous forest in the Tierras Bajas, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Conservation Biology 15: 856–66.
Tole, L. 2001. Jamaica's disappearing forests: Physical and human aspects. Environmental Management 28: 455–67.
———. 2001. Indigenous peoples and biodiversity. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, ed. S. Levin. San Diego: Academic Press.
Viglizzo, E.F., and F.C. Frank. 2006. Land-use options for del plata basin in South America: Tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 57: 140–51.
Villers-Ruiz, L., and I. Trejo-Vázquez. 1997. Assessment of the vulnerability of forest ecosystems to climate change in Mexico. Climate Research 9: 87–93.
Wunder, S. 2007. The effciency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 48–58.
Zak, M.R., M. Cabido, and J.G. Hodgson. 2004. Do subtropical seasonal forests in the Gran Chaco, Argentina, have a future? Biological Conservation 120: 589–98.
Zarco, A. 2001. Dinámica y distribución espacial y temporal del C y N en el suelo en un ecosistema tropical estacional: Un enfoque de paisaje. BS diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Acknowledgments
Many of the ideas and perspectives addressed in this chapter were inspired by the collaborative research we have been conducting around the Chamela- Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve; we would like to thank all the participants in the Cuencas, Cuitzmala, and Mabotro projects for their insights and support, as well as CONACYT for its support through the grant SEP-CONACYT 50955. We also thank G. Daily for her input to earlier versions of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Island Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balvanera, P., Castillo, A., MartÍnez-Harms, M.J. (2011). Ecosystem Services in Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. In: Dirzo, R., Young, H.S., Mooney, H.A., Ceballos, G. (eds) Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-021-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-021-7_15
Publisher Name: Island Press, Washington, DC
Online ISBN: 978-1-61091-021-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)