Skip to main content

U.S. Water Policy Reform

  • Chapter
The World’s Water

Part of the book series: The World’s Water ((WORLDWA))

Abstract

The United States faces a bevy of persistent and emerging water challenges in the 21st century. Many key water laws and policies are outdated or not effectively or equitably enforced. An increasing number of aquatic ecosystems are in danger of collapse. Many cities, businesses, and farms are not taking advantage of existing, cost-effective water conservation technologies and practices. Much of the nation’s infrastructure is outdated and will become increasingly obsolete as climate change alters the timing and magnitude of water supplies. Rising energy demands and shifts in energy sources, such as increased ethanol and natural gas production, are putting additional pressure on the nation’s water resources. In turn, increased water demand for growing populations will have important energy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, A.J. 2005. Engaging Disadvantaged Communities: Lessons from the Inkomati CMA Process. Paper presented at the international workshop on African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa, January 26–28, 2005, Johannesburg, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouleau, G. 2008. The WFD dreams: Between ecology and economics. Water and Environment Journal 22(4): 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., Brandes, O.M., and Gurman, S., eds. 2009. Making the Most of the Water We Have: The Soft Path Approach to Water Management. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian-Smith, J., and Gleick, P.H., eds. In press. A 21 st Century U.S. Water Policy. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2009. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council in Accordance with Article 18.3 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC on Programmes for Monitoring of Water Status. http://ec.europa.eu/environment /water/water-framework/implrep2007/pdf/com_209_156_en.pdf (accessed February 28, 2011).

  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO). 2008. Water Availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO MurrayDarling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. from www.csiro.au/mdbsy (accessed February 28, 2011).

  • Craik, W., and Cleaver, J. 2008. Modern agriculture under stress—Lessons from the Murray-Darling. The Murray-Darling Basin Commission. MDBC Publicaton 46/08. Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2009). Climate Change Adaptation: Strategic Federal Planning Could Help Government Officials Make More Informed Decisions. GAO-10-113. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-113 (accessed February 28, 2011).

  • Grantham, T., Christian-Smith, J., Kondolf, G.M., and Scheuer, S. 2008. A Fresh Perspective for Managing Water in California: Insights from Applying the European Water Framework Directive to the Russian River. Water Resources Center Report 208. Berkeley, California: Water Resources Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelks, H.L., Walsh, S.J., Burkhead, N.M., Contreras-Balderas, S., Díaz-Pardo, E., Hendrickson, D.A., Lyons, J., Mandrak, N.E., McCormick, F., Nelson, J.S., Platania, S.P., Porter, B.A., Renaud, C.B., Schmitter-Soto, J.J., Taylor, E.B., and Warren Jr., M.L. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8): 372–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshy, J. 2009. Notes on a progressive national water policy. Harvard Law and Policy Review 3: 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movik, S. 2009. The Dynamics and Discourses of Water Allocation Reform in South Africa. STEPS Working Paper 21. Brighton, United Kingdom: STEPS Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movik, S. 2011. Allocation discourses: South African water rights reform. Water Policy 13(2): 161177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Water Commission (NWC). 1973. Water Policies for the Future: Final Report to the President and to the Congress of the United States by the National Water Commission. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J.C. 2001. Federal water policy: An idea whose time will (finally) come. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 20: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J.C. 2010. Are we there yet? Weary travelers on the long road to water policy reform. Natural Resources Journal 50: 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, Department of Water Affairs. 2011. Blue Drop System. http://www.dwa.gov.za/dir_ws/DWQR/default.asp (accessed February 21, 2011).

  • Schneider, K. 2009. Australia’s food bowl, like The world’s, is drying up. Circle of Blue Water News, March9,2009. http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2009/world/australia-drought-water-warning/ (accessed February 9, 2010).

  • Schreiner, B., and Van Koppen, B. 2002. Catchment management agencies for poverty eradication in South Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27(11): 969–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. 2007. Safeguarding the World’s Water. Cabri-Volga Brief, 3/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2006. Wadeable streams assessment: A collaborative survey of the nation’s streams. EPA 841-B-06-002. Washington, D.C.: Office of Research and Development and Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House Council on Environmental Quality. (2010). Progress Report of the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force: Recommended Actions in Support of a National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites /ceq/Interagency-Climate-Change-Adaptation-Progress-Report.pdf

  • Wolff, G., and Gleick, P.H. 2002. The soft path for water. In: The World’s Water 2002–2003. P.H. Gleick, editor. Covelo, California: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (WHO/UNICEF). 2010. Estimates for the Use of Improved Drinking Water Sources: South Africa. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. March 10, 2010. http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user _upload/resources/ZAF_wat.pdf (accessed February 19, 2011).

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Peter H. Gleick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christian-Smith, J., Gleick, P.H., Cooley, H. (2012). U.S. Water Policy Reform. In: Gleick, P.H. (eds) The World’s Water. The World’s Water. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-228-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships