Abstract
The project ‘Legal systems and ethical values behind the official and the stakeholder-based animal welfare control’ covers studies of farm animal welfare legislation and ten private animal welfare standards from four European countries. Their expressed aim of prevention of suffering is in focus. Many pieces of legislation stating the aim of preventing ‘unnecessary suffering’ lack a clear distinction between ‘unnecessary’ and ‘necessary’ calling for definitions, as it is difficult to decide where to draw the line in actual farming, or for a citizen to interpret what is regarded acceptable by the legislator. Several interpretations are possible, e.g. the intensity and duration of the suffering, the intention behind the act, the fulfillment of human interests and the animals’ interests. Furthermore, countries differ regarding what species are legally protected and at what level. We will further discuss ethical values behind such differences. Painful management procedures are legal in many countries, and hence regarded as ‘necessary suffering’ in some –but not all – countries. As private standards are developed to meet consumer demands for a stricter interpretation of ‘unnecessary’ it is important to clarify inherent values. We tentatively argue that besides utilitarian ethical thinking duty, contractarian and/or virtue ethical thinking can be found in both legislation and private standards. If so, this mirrors consumer interest in an integrated and complex reasoning related to the concept of ‘unnecessary suffering’, a complexity that needs to be considered in forthcoming legislation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Algers, B. (2011). Animal welfare – recent developments in the field. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 6. Available at: www.cabi.org/cabreviews.
Bayvel, A.C.D. (2004). Science-based animal welfare standards: the international role of the Office International des Epizooties. Animal Welfare 13: 163-S169.
Behdadi, D. (2012). ‘The compassionate stock-keeper’ and other virtous ideals. Values and definitions in the animal welfare legislations of the United Kingdom, Spain and Argentina. Report 32. Department of Animal Environment and Health. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.
Bentham, J. (1789). A utilitarian view. In: Regan, T. and Singer, P. (eds.) Animal rights and human obligations (1989), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, pp. 25-26.
Braithwaite V.A. and Boulcott, P. (2007). Pain perception, aversion and fear in fish. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 75: 131-138.
Chandroo, K.P., Duncan, I.J.H. and Moccia R.D. (2004). Can fish suffer?: perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86: 225–250.
Croney, C.C. and Millman, S.T. (2007). Board-invited review: The ethical and behavioral bases for farm animal welfare legislation. Journal of Animal Science 85: 556–565.
Curry, P. (2011). Ecological ethics – an introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
EFSA (2009). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from European Commission on General approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. The EFSA Journal 954: 1-26.
Elwood, R.W., Barr, S. and Patterson, L. (2009). Pain and stress in crustaceans? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 128-136.
Eurobarometer. (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals
European Commission (2007). Treaty of Lisbon.
Forsberg, E-M. (2011). Inspiring respect for animals through the law? Current development in the Norwegian animal welfare legislation. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 24: 351-366.
Gregory, N.G. (2004). Physiology and behavior of animal suffering. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Hurnik, F. and Lehman, H. (1982). Unnecessary suffering: definition and evidence. International Journal for the Study of Animal 3(2): 131-137.
Hursthouse, R. (2006). Applying virtue ethics to our treatment of the other animals. In: Welchman, J. (ed.) The practice of virtue. Hackett Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Landera-Luri, M. (2010). Animal welfare regulations in the EU: a matter of ethics or a matter of human economic interest? In: Casabona, R. (ed.) Global food security: ethical and legal challenges. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, p. 354-359.
Lassen, J., Sandoe, P. and Forkman, B. (2006). Happy pigs are dirty! Conflicting perspectives on animal welfare. Livestock Science 103: 221-230.
Lund, V., Anthony, R. and Röcklinsberg, H. 2004. The ethical contract as a tool in organic animal husbandry. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17(1): 23-49.
Lund, V., Mejdell, C.M., Röcklinsberg, H., Anthony, R. and Håstein, T. (2007). Expanding the moral circle: farmed fish as objects of moral concern. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 75: 109-118.
Nussbaum M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rachels, J. (2007). The elements of moral philosophy. 5th edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, NY, USA.
Röcklinsberg, H. (2001). Das Seufzende Schwein. Zur Theorie und Praxis in deutschen Modellen zur Tierethik. Monograph, doctoral thesis. Harald Fischer Verlag, Erlangen, Germany.
Sandøe, P. and Christiansen, S.B. (2008). Ethics of animal use. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Sandøe, P., Christiansen, S.B. and Appelby, M.C. (2003). Farm animal welfare: the interaction of ethical questions and animal welfare science. Animal Welfare 12: 469-478.
Striwing, H. and Ǻslund, M. (2005). Djurskydd – fakta och tips. Striwing, Falun, Sweden.
Underwood, W.J. (2002). Pain and distress in agricultural animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA) 2: 208-211.
Vapnek, J. and Chapman, M. (2010). Legislative and regulatory options for animal welfare. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bock, B. and Roe, E. (2008). European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113: 279-297.
Wahlberg, B. (2011). Reglering och forvaltning av produktions- och slaktdjurs välbefinnande – En offentligrättslig undersökning. Doctoral thesis. Abo Akademi. Turku, Finland.
Würbel, H. (2009). Ethology applied to animal ethics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 118-127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lundmark, F., Berg, C., Röcklinsberg, H. (2013). ‘Unnecessary suffering’ as a concept in animal welfare legislation and standards. In: Röcklinsberg, H., Sandin, P. (eds) The ethics of consumption. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_18
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-784-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)