Skip to main content
  • 1098 Accesses

Abstract

Intensive farming systems, those that are heavy users of chemical inputs (fertilizers, pesticides, veterinary products) and are largely mechanized, today dominate agriculture in developed countries and are expanding in many countries of the South. They are generally more productive per hectare than traditional agricultural systems and are labour-efficient, leading to an unprecedented rise in labour productivity. However, the question of the sustainability of these input-intensive systems must be considered. They are heavy fossil-energy consumers, producers of greenhouse gases and are generally detrimental to biodiversity. They pollute water with nitrates, phosphoric compounds and pesticides. While they may have helped reduce famine and lowered urban food costs, they have also led to the concentration of production in the hands of those who have been able to invest in inputs and mechanization, and thus have exacerbated the vulnerability of farmers who had no access to these means (De Schutter, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept of technological lock-in reflects a situation in which a technology A could be adopted permanently, even irreversibly, at the expense of technology B, even if technology B appears, ex post, to be the most effective (Labarthe, 2010).

References

  • Albaladéjo, C., 2012. Les transformations de l’espace rural pampéen face à la mondialisation. Annales de Géographie (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergez, J.E., Colbach, N., Crespo, O., Garcia, F., Jeuffroy, M.H., Justes, E., Loyce, C., Munier-Jolain, N. and Sadok, W., 2010. Designing crop management systems by simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 32, 3-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, W.L., 1999. Toward integrated assessment in agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 60, 157-167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Makowski, D., Aveline, A., Girardin, P. and Plantureux, S., 2008. Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 139-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botta, G.F., Tolón-Becerra, A., Lastra-Bravo, X. and Tourn, M.C., 2011. A research of the environmental and social effects of the adoption of biotechnological practices for soybean cultivation in Argentina. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2, 359-369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butault, J.P., Dedryver, C.A., Gary, C., Guichard, L., Jacquet, F., Meynard, J-M., Nicot, P., Pitrat, M., Reau, R., Sauphanor, B., Savini, I. and Volay T., 2010. Ecophyto R&D, quelles voies pour réduire l’usage des pesticides. Synthèse du rapport d’étude. INRA éditeur, France, 90 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castella, J.C., Jourdain, D., Trébuil, G. and Napompeth, B., 1999. A systems approach to understanding obstacles to effective implementation of IPM in Thailand: key issues for the cotton industry. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 72, 17-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevassus-Au-Louis, B., 2009. Refonder la recherche agronomique. In: Les defis de l’agriculture mondiale au XXI ème siècle. Recueil des leçons inaugurales du groupe ESA, Angers, France, pp. 193-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collectif ComMod (Companion Modelling, CIRAD-INRA-IRD), 2006. La modélisation comme outil d’accompagnement. Natures, Sciences et Sociétés, 13 (2), 165-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. and Gunby, P., 1996. Sprayed to death: path dependence, lock-in and pest control. Economic Journal, 106(436), 521-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K., Chatellier, V. and Chevassus-Lozza, E., 2008. Localisation des productions agricoles dans l’UE. L’enjeu de l’évolution des politiques agricole et commerciale. Chambres d’Agriculture 969, 24-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darré, J.P. (ed.), 1994. Pairs et experts dans l’agriculture. Dialogues et production de connaissances pour l’action. Ed. Erès, Ramonville Saint-Agne, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A., 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75 (2), 332-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter O., 2010. Rapport du Rapporteur spécial sur le droit à l’alimentation. United Nations Organization, General Assembly of 20 December 2010, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorel, M., Tixier, P., Dural, D. and Zanoletti, S., 2011. Alternatives aux intrants chimiques en culture bananière. Innovations Agronomiques, 16, 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, procedures and microeconomics. Effects on innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (3), 1120-1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, M. (ed.), 2010. Companion modelling. A participatory approach to sustainable development. Quae, Versailles, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C., Lieblein, G., Gliessman, S., Breland, T.A., Creamer, N., Harwood, R., Salomonsson, L., Helenius, J., Rickerl, D., Salvador, R., Wiedenhoeft, M., Simmons, S., Allen, P., Altieri, M., Flora, C. and Poincelot, R., 2003. Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22, 99-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffon, M., 2009. Pour des agricultures écologiquement intensives. In: Les defis de l’agriculture mondiale au XXI ème siècle. Recueil des leçons inaugurales du groupe ESA, Angers, France, pp. 169-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosso, S., 2011. Transformations du conseil agricole en région pampéenne argentine et recomposition de la profession ‘d’ingénieur agronome’. Thèse Univ Toulouse le Mirail, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labarthe, P., 2010. Services immatériels et verrouillage technologique. Le cas du conseil technique aux agriculteurs. Economies et Sociétés, 44, 173-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C., Meynard, J.M., Bui, S. and Messéan, A., 2010. Réductions d’intrants: des changements techniques, et après? Effets de verrouillage et voies d’évolution à l’échelle du système agri-alimentaire. Innovations Agronomiques, 8, 121-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C., Meynard, J.-M., Perrot, N. and Bellon, S., 2009. Analyse des formes de transition vers des agricultures plus écologiques: les cas de l’agriculture biologique et de la protection intégrée. Innovations Agronomiques, 4, 483-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, P., Blouin, M., Boyer, J., Cadet, P., Laffray, D., Pham-Thi, A.T., Reversat, G., Settle, W. and Zuily, Y., 2004. Plant parasite control and soil fauna diversity. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327, 629-638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard, J.M., 2008. Produire autrement: réinventer les systèmes de cultures. In: Reau, R. and Doré, T. (eds.) Systèmes de culture innovants et durables. Editions éducagri, Dijon, France, pp. 11-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard, J.M., 2010. Réinventer les systèmes agricoles: quelle agronomie pour un développement durable? [Reinventing agricultural systems: what type of agronomy for a sustainable development?]. In: Bourg, D. and Papaux, A. (eds.) Vers une société sobre et désirable. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, France, pp. 342-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard, J.M. and Girardin, P., 1991. Produire autrement. Courrier de la Cellule Environnement de L’INRA, 15, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard, J.M., Dedieu, B. and Bos, A.P., 2012 Re-design and co-design of farming systems.An overview of methods and practices. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibon, D. and Dedieu, B. (eds.) Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 407-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard, J.M., Dupraz, P. and Dron, D., 2003. Grande culture. Dossiers de l’environnement de l’INRA 2003, (23 Expertise Collective ATEPE: Agriculture, Territoire, Environnement dans les Politiques Européennes), pp. 69-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischler, P., Lheureux, S., Dumoulin, F., Menu, P., Sene, O., Hopquin, J.P., Cariolle, M., Reau, R., Munier-Jolain, N., Faloya, V., Boizard, H. and Meynard, J.M., 2009. Huit fermes de grande culture engagées en production intégrée réduisent les pesticides sans baisse de marge. Le Courrier de l’Environnement, 57, 73-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., 2005. Actor based analysis and modelling approaches. The integrated Assessment Journal, 5, 97-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papy, F. and Torre, A., 2002. Quelles organisations territoriales pour concilier production agricole et gestion des ressources naturelles? Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement, 33, 151-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossing, W.A.H., Meynard, J.M. and Van Ittersum, M.K., 1997. Model-based explorations to support development of sustainable farming systems: case studies from France and the Netherlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 7, 271-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadok, W., Angevin, F., Bergez, J.E., Bockstaller, C., Colomb, B., Guichard, L., Reau, R., Doré, T., 2008. Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 163-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, C., Mignolet, C. and Meynard, J.M. 2011. Les oléoprotéagineux dans les systèmes de culture: évolution des assolements et des successions culturales depuis les années 1970 dans le bassin de la Seine [Oilseeds in cropping systems: changes in rotations since 1970 in the Seine water basin]. Oléagineux, Corps gras, Lipides, 17, 276-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulard, C.T., 2005. La multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture en pratique: étude des relations entre exploitations agricoles et étangs de la Dombes. Cybergeo, European Journal of Geography, 319. DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.6610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thenail, C., Joannon, A., Capitaine, M., Souchere, V., Mignolet, C., Schermann, N., Di Pietro, F., Pons, Y., Gaucherel, C., Viaud, V. and Baudry, J., 2009. The contribution of crop-rotation organization in farms to crop-mosaic patterning at local landscape scales. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 131, 207-219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanloqueren, G. and Baret, P., 2008. Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in’ case study. Ecological Economics, 66, 436-446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanloqueren, G. and Baret, P., 2009. How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38, 971-983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K.D., 2007. Agroecology in action; extending alternative agriculture through social networks. The MIT Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D. and David, C., 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement or a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 503-515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Meynard .

Editor information

E. Coudel H. Devautour C. T. Soulard G. Faure B. Hubert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meynard, JM. (2013). Innovating in cropping and farming systems. In: Coudel, E., Devautour, H., Soulard, C.T., Faure, G., Hubert, B. (eds) Renewing innovation systems in agriculture and food. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-768-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics