Abstract
This paper explores the influence of gender, nutrition education and nutrition labelling format on nutrition quality assessment and nutrition label format preference. Many studies have shown that it is mostly women who purchase food for households, indicating that research related to nutrition assessment may be female biased. In order to avoid this bias, female (n=15) and male (n=15) participants who are responsible or co-responsible for purchasing food in their households were selected from the general population in Croatia to participate in face-to-face multiple survey tasks. The results showed a significant influence of gender, education and nutrition labelling format on nutrition quality assessment. Men needed significantly less time for nutrition quality assessment than women. After nutrition education, survey participants needed significantly less time for assessment than before education. A visually re-designed current European back-of-pack nutrition label format proved the most effective format for research participants’ nutrition quality assessment, but at the same time, participants found it difficult to understand. This study was limited to a small sample of participants but the results can later be used in testing a more representative sample. The study shed new light on consumer attitudes regarding current European nutrition label format, stressing the differences between men and women in nutrition quality assessment. The study also underlines the importance of effective nutrition education which should incorporate socio-demographic and cultural dimensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Arithmetic mean.
References
Bakewell, C. and V.W. Mitchell, 2006. Male versus female consumer decision making styles. Journal of Business Research, 59: 1297-1300.
Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), 2005. Report on European Consumers’ perception of foodstuffs labelling. Available at: http://www.beuc.org/.
Colić Barić, I., R. Kajfež, Z. Šatalić and S. Cvjetić, 2004. Comparison of dietary habits in the uraban and rural Coratian shoolchildren. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 43: 169-174.
Confederation of the Food and Drink Industries of the EU (CIAA). (2006). CIAA Recommendation for a Common Nutrition Labelling Scheme. Available at: http://www.ciaa.be/.
Cullen, K.W., T. Baranowski and S. Smith, 2001. Using goal setting as a strategy for dietary behavior change. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 101 (5): 562-566.
EU Council Directive, 1990. Council Directive 90/496/EEC of 24 September 1990 on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs. OJ L 276, 40-44.
European Food Information Council, 2004. Consumer attitudes to nutrition information & food labelling: results of the EUFIC consumer research 2004. Available at: http://www.eufic.org/.
European Food Information Council, 2006. An energy-based approach to nutrition information on food labels. Available at: http://www.eufic.org/.
European Heart Network, 2003. A systematic review of the research on consumer understanding of nutrition labelling. Available at: http://www.ehnheart.org/.
Food Standards Agency, 2001. Nutritional labelling qualitative research final report. http://www.food.gov.uk/.
Gracia, A., M. Loureiro and R.M. Nayaga Jr., 2007. Do consumers perceive benefits from the implementation of a EU mandatory nutritional labelling program? Food Policy 32: 160-174.
Grunert, K.G. and J.M. Wills, 2007. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. Journal of Public Health, 15: 385-399.
Hawthorne, K.M., K. Moreland, I.J. Griffin and S.A. Abrams, 2006. An educational program enhances food label understanding of young adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106 (6): 913-916.
Lapalainnen, R, J. Kearney and M. Gibney, 1998. A pan EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health: An overview. Food Quality and Prefrences, 9(6): 467-478.
Levy, A.S., S.B. Fein and R.E. Schucker, 1991. Nutrition labelling formats: performance and preference. Food Technology, 45: 116-121.
Levy, A.S., S.B. Fein and R.E. Schucker, 1996. Performance characteristics of seven nutrition label formats. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15(1): 1-15.
Lewis, C.J. and E.A. Yetley, 1992. Focus group sessions on formats of nutrition labels. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 92 (1): 62-66.
Ministry of Health and National Institute of Public Health, 1999. Croatian nutrition policy. Zagreb, Croatia.
Pirouznia, M., 2001. The association between nutrition knowledge and eating beahaviour in male and female adolescents in the US. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 52: 127-132.
Ranilović, J., J. Markovina, K. Žnidar and I. Colić Barić, 2009. Attitudes to healthy eating among a representative sampling of Croatian adults: a comparison with Mediterranean countries. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 60 (S7): 11-29.
Ranilović, J. and I. Colić Barić, 2011. Differences between younger and older populations in nutrition label reading habits. British Food Journal, 113 (1): 109-121.
Ranilović, J. and I. Colić Barić, 2012. Perceived barriers and motives to reading nutrition label among label ‘non-users’ in Croatia, Croatian Journal of Food Technology, Biotechnology and Nutrition, in press.
Regulation on nutrition labelling, 2009. Official Journal of the Croatia, No. 29/09, 74/08, Zagreb, Croatia.
Satia, J.A., J.A. Galanko and M.L. Neuhouser, 2005. Food nutrition label use is associated with demographic, behavioural and psychosocial factors and dietary intake among African Americans in North Carolina. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105 (3): 392-403.
Turek, S., I. Rudan, N. Smolej-Narancic, L. Szirovicza, M. Cubrilo-Turek, V. Zerjavić-Hrabak, A. Rak-Kaić, D. Vrhovski-Hebrang, Z. Prebeg, M. Ljubicić, B. Janićijević and P. Rudan, 2001. A large cross-sectional study of health attitudes, knowledge, behaviour and risks in the post-war Croatian population (the first Croatian health project). Coll Anthropol 25(1):77-96.
Tussing, L. and K. Chapman-Novakofski, 2005. Osteoporosis prevention education: behaviour theories and calcium intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(1): 92-97.
Acknowledgements
The present study was a part of the doctorate degree of the author, supported by Podravka. The author wishes to thank professor Irena Colić Barić from the Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Croatia, for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers The Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ranilović, J., Barić, I.C. (2013). Influence of gender, nutrition education and nutrition labelling format on nutrition quality assessment. In: Klopčič, M., Kuipers, A., Hocquette, JF. (eds) Consumer attitudes to food quality products. EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science, vol 133. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-762-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-762-2_15
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-762-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)