Skip to main content

Consumer perceptions of home made, organic, EU certified, and traditional local products in Slovenia

  • Chapter
Consumer attitudes to food quality products

Part of the book series: EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science ((EAAP,volume 133))

  • 1429 Accesses

Abstract

This study provides information on the position of regular, organic, PDO/PGI (Protected Designated Origin/Protected Geographical Indication), mountain and farm made cheeses and sausages in the minds of Slovene consumers, and identifies opportunities to improve the positioning of these products. We present the results of a questionnaire sent to 2,300 Slovene consumers, of which 360 were returned, and 315 did not have any missing values and were used for statistical analysis. The sample provides a reasonable representation of the Slovene population. Respondents answered questions on the relevance of 16 food characteristics, such as nutrition, healthiness, price, animal friendly production, specific region production, taste, and ease of preparation. Respondents gave scores between 1 (not important) and 7 (very important). Also consumers’ perceptions of regular, organic, traditional and farm-made products on these food characteristics were measured. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified the following main components: healthiness, good price, sustainable production, traditional production, indulgence and convenience (shopping and preparing). The results show the components which determine Slovene consumers’ intentions to buy different types of cheeses and sausages. It appears that a high score on the relevance of a food characteristic is not necessarily reflected in the buying decision. Implications of the results for the marketing of cheeses and sausages are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Day, D., B. Gan, P. Gendall and D. Esslemont, 1991. Predicting purchase behavior. Marketing Bulletin, 2: 18-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. and R. Wensley, 1988. Assessing advantage – a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2): 1-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, R., 1997. Consumer behaviour: Advances and applications in marketing. Prentice Hall: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esselink, H., 2009. Agricultural production chains in Slovenia. Market overview and analysis of agricultural and food production chains in Slovenia. 94 pp. Available at: http://edepot.wur.nl/16043.

  • Homburg, C. and C. Pflesser, 2000. A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4): 449-462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G.T.M. and D.J. Ketchen, 2001. Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9): 899-906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, A.H., S. Jayachandran and W.O. Bearden, 2005. Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2): 24-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A.K. and B.J. Jaworski, 1990. Market orientation – the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and K.L. Keller, 2009. Marketing management. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menguc, B. and S. Auh, 2006. Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1): 63-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J.C. and S.F. Slater, 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 20-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohar, J. and M. Klopčič, 2012. Review of food chain in Slovenia. In: Klopčič, M., A. Kuipers and J.F. Hocquette (eds.) Consumer attitudes to food quality products. EAAP Publication no. 133. Wageningen Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, pp. 161-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., 1990. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21: 309-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum, K., J.M.E. Pennings, B. Wansink and H.C.M. van Trijp, 2007. The validity of attribute-importance measurement: A review. Journal of Business Research, 60(11): 1177-1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Klopčič .

Editor information

Marija Klopčič Abele Kuipers Jean-François Hocquette

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers The Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klopčič, M., Verhees, F.J.H.M., Kuipers, A., Kos-Skubic, M. (2013). Consumer perceptions of home made, organic, EU certified, and traditional local products in Slovenia. In: Klopčič, M., Kuipers, A., Hocquette, JF. (eds) Consumer attitudes to food quality products. EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science, vol 133. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-762-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics