Skip to main content

Processors and retailers attitudes towards consumer demand for dairy nutrition and health claimed products in Western Balkan Countries

  • Chapter
Consumer attitudes to food quality products

Abstract

This study is addressed to the nutrition and health (N&H) claimed dairy products market and the different factors that influence development of this market segment in Balkan countries. The empirical analysis deals with examination of differences both in processors’ and retailers’ attitudes between two N&H claimed product category groups – dairy and other products (jam, margarine, fruit juices and dietetic products). The analysis was based on data from the following two primary sources: (1) data collected by store check, both in hypermarkets and specialized shops; and (2) data obtained from processors and retailers by in-depth interviews. Dairy products milk and yogurt with N&H claims cover one quarter of all products surveyed by store check. The largest number of brands in Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are of domestic origin, while other Western Balkan Countries (WBC) brands are most common on the Macedonian and Montenegrin markets. The number of N&H claims made on dairy products depends on the origin of the product – WBC producers make more claims per product than EU producers. Around one third of all claims are health related. Visual presentation of products included use of different images such as an ideal female figure, a sign for urgent medical help and arrows around the waist. The store check also served to identify producers who were potential candidates for interviews in the six WBCs involved in this study. In total, 36 producers and 24 retailers participated in the interviews. Overall response rate was 71%. Dairy products – milk, yoghurt/kefir and cheese accounted for 52 out of 120 observations. Two of the analyses of this study are presented. The first analysis deals with the examination of differences between dairy and other N&H claimed products, and the second refers to differences between the dairy processors’ and retailers’ points of view. For that purpose, a non-parametric testing procedure based on two independent samples was used. This procedure is based on the Mann-Whitney test which uses the rank of each group and the sum of ranks to examine whether category groups are drawn from the same population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FOCUS-BALKANS: Food Consumer Sciences in the Balkans: Frameworks, Protocols and Networks for a better knowledge of food behaviours, FP7 Cooperation Work Programme: Theme 2 – Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechnology, Grant Agreement no 212579 – Analysis is based on D6.1 – Consumer motivations and behaviours for products with nutrition and health claims, draft version, edited by Z. Stojanovic, M. Zaouche-Laniau, D. Barjolle and M. Esteve.

  2. 2.

    One interview covers two categories of products surveyed by a questionnaire. Thus, the number of observed categories in relation to the interviews done is higher: 62 for processors and 58 for retailers.

  3. 3.

    This test is equivalent to the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis test for two samples. The MW test could also compare the medians of the two groups but under restrictive assumption that population distributions are different only in location (not in shape). If they are equivalent in location, the ranks should be randomly mixed between the two samples. However, when this assumption is not satisfied, MW test is not appropriate for testing difference between medians of the two populations (MW statistics can have a p-value equals to 0 even though the two groups have identical medians).

References

  • Deepananda, H., J. Cranfield, S. Henson and D. Sparling, 2008. Market and regulatory factors influencing innovation and commercialization in Canada’s functional food and nutraceutical sector. Agribusiness, 24, 2: 207-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijević-Branković, S.I., J.K. Baras and J. Bojović, 2002. Značaj i mogućnosti proizvodnje funkcionalne hrane, Hemijska industrija, 56, 3: 113-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diplock, A.T., P.J. Agget, M. Ashwell, F. Bornet, E.B. Fern and. M.B. Roberfroid, 1999. Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe: consensus document. British Journal of Nutrition, 81: S1-S27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., G. Armstrong and H. Farley, 2003. Opportunities and constraints in the functional food market, Nutrition and Food Science, 33: 213-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grujić, R., 2005. Food labelling. In: Grujić, R. and V. Sanchis (eds.) Proceedings of final TEMPUS seminar. Banja Luka, Serbia, pp. 105-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, V. and D. Pokorn, 1999. Comparison of nutritional habits among various adult age groups in Slovenia, Nutritional Research, 19: 1153-1164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M and J.B. Germov, 1999. Future food: the politics of functional foods and health claims. A Sociology of Food and Nutrition: The Social Appetite, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 54-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljaljević, A., B. Durišić, N. Mališić and L.J. Ivanović, 2006. The volume of nutrition elements from milk and eggs in the acreage daily nutrition of the Montenegrin population compared to the recommended daily nutrition components volume, Institute for public health of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marčeta-Kamenko, N., R. Grujić, S. Grujić and J. Komić, 2004. Analysis of consumers knowledge related to nutrition influence on obesity in Republika Srpska, Conference proceedings – Prvi kongres o hiperlipoproteinima Srbije i Crne Gore, Novi Sad, Serbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark-Herbert, C., 2003. Development and marketing strategies for functional foods. AgBioForum, 6(1&2): 75-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark-Herbert, C., 2004. Innovation of a new product category – Functional foods. Technovation, 24: 713-719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miletić, I., S. Šobajić and B. Đorđević, 2008. Funkcionalna hrana – uloga u unapređenju zdravlja, Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 27 (3): 367-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, M., 2002. Food politics: how the food industry influences nutrition and health. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., G.E. West and C. Wang, 2006. Consumer attitudes and acceptance of CLA-enriched dairy products. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54 (4): 663-684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raspor, P. and M. Jevsnik, 2008. Good nutritional practice from producer to consumer. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 48(3): 276-292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ristevska-Jovanovska, S., 2007. Промени во заштитата на потрошувачитево ЕУ согласно со програмата 2007-2013 и состојбитево Република Македонија, Annual of the Faculty of Economics, 42: 39-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristić, N.G., 2003. Funkcionalna hrana – hrana za XXI vek, Mlekarstvo, 2, 14: 428-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj, I., 2000. Funkcionalna hrana – hrana bodućnosti, Prehrambena industrija. Mleko i mlečni proizvodi. 11, 1/2: 40-42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaafsma, G. and F. Kok, 2005. Nutritional aspects of food innovations: a focus on FFs. In: Jongen, W.M.F. and M. Meulenberg (eds.) Innovation in agri-food systems. Product quality and consumer acceptance. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 207-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanković, M.I. and B.I. Đorđević, 2002. Funkcionalna i nekonvencionalna hrana – zakonska regulativa, Hrana i ishrana, 43, 1-2: 60-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Knox, B. and P. Mitchell, 2003. What separates the winner from the losers in new food product development? Trends in Food Science & Technology, 14: 58-64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, Ž., M. Zaouche-Laniau, D. Barjolle and M. Esteve, 2010. D6.1 – Consumer motivations and behaviours for products with nutrition and health claims, FP7 Focus-Balkans project document, available at http://focus-balkans.org/?p=69#Project_results.

  • Strauss, J. and T. Dunkan, 1998. Health, nutrition and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 766-817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šobajić, S., 2002. Funkcionalna hrana u prevenciji bolesti i terapiji. Arhiv za farmaciju, 52, 3: 369-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, E., H.C.M. Van Trijp, P. Luning and W. Jongen, 2002. Consumer-oriented functional food development: how well do functional disciplines reflect the ‘voice of the consumer?’ Trends in Food Science and Technology, 13: 93-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study reported is funded by the European Commission and based on results from the sixth work package (WP6) of the FOCUS-Balkans Project promoting better knowledge of food behaviours and healthy diet at WBC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Žaklina Stojanović .

Editor information

Marija Klopčič Abele Kuipers Jean-François Hocquette

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers The Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stojanović, Ž., Dragutinović-Mitrović, R., Ognjanov, G. (2013). Processors and retailers attitudes towards consumer demand for dairy nutrition and health claimed products in Western Balkan Countries. In: Klopčič, M., Kuipers, A., Hocquette, JF. (eds) Consumer attitudes to food quality products. EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science, vol 133. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-762-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics