Abstract
Humanity’s current consumption patterns threaten the lives of current as well as future people. This provides a strong moral imperative to take the material constraints of the environment as the point of departure for an account of sustainable distributive justice. This ecological space paradigm should focus on a multidimensional, non-aggregative conception of carrying capacity. However, because resources are merely instrumental in pursuing various ends, we suggest combining capabilities and ecological space as the currency of distributive justice. As regards scope, this integrative account has the major advantage of combining the strength of the capabilities approach regarding global justice with the focus of the ecological space paradigm on intertemporal justice. The pattern of distribution should then take the form of distributing material resources so as to enable everyone to reach the capability threshold, while the leftover ecological space should be distributed on an equal per capita basis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, M., Frame, D., Frieler, K, Hare, W., Huntingford, C., Jones, C., Knutti, R., Lowe, J., Meinshausen, M, Meinshausen, N. and Raper, S. (2009). The exit strategy. Nature reports climate change 3: 56–58.
Broome, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change. Pay now or pay more later? Scientific American, June 2008: 97–102.
Chambers, N., Simmons, C. and Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing nature’s interest. Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. Earthscan, London.
Caney, S. (2009). Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics 5: 125–146.
Gardiner, S. M. (2004). Ethics and global climate change. Ethics 114: 555–600.
Global Humanitarian Forum (2009). The anatomy of a silent crisis. Available at: http://www.ghf-ge.org/human-impactreport.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2011.
Hayward, T. (2006). Global justice and the distribution of natural resources. Political Studies 54: 349–369.
Hayward, T. (2007). Human rights versus emissions rights: climate justice and the equitable distribution of ecological space. Ethics and international affairs 21: 431–450.
McMichael, A., Nyong, A. and Corvalan, C. (2008). Global environmental change and health: impacts, inequalities, and the health sector. BMJ 336: 191–194.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Page, E. A. (2007). Intergenerational justice of what: welfare, resources or capabilities? Environmental politics 16: 453–469.
Rees, W. and Wackernagel, M. (1994). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. In: Jansson, A., Hammer, M., Folke, C. and Constanza, R. (eds.) Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability. Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 362–390.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F., Lambin, E., Lenton, T., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R., Fabry, V., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. and Foley, J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475.
Sen, A. (1979). Equality of what? In: McMurrin, S.M. (ed.) The tanner lecture on human values, Vol. 1. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Sen, A. (1990). Justice: means versus freedoms. Philosophy and public affairs 19: 111–121.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Alan Lane, London.
Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law and policy 15: 39–59.
Van den Bergh, J. and Verbruggen, H. (1999). Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecological economics 29: 61–72.
Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric justice. A political theory of climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Publishers.
Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. E. (1997). Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological economics 20: 3–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peeters, W., Dirix, J., Sterckx, S. (2012). Towards an ecological space paradigm: fair and sustainable distribution of environmental resources. In: Potthast, T., Meisch, S. (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_6
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-753-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
