Skip to main content

Adaptive capacities from an animal welfare perspective

  • Chapter
Climate change and sustainable development

Abstract

New animal farming system designs, inspired by Complex Adaptive System (CAS) approaches, aim to increase animal welfare by selectively utilizing the adaptive capacity of animals in the design of livestock systems. Our paper addresses the question how to understand the utilization of adaptive capacities to further optimize livestock production systems (LPS) from an animal welfare perspective. We take the recursive control approach (RCA) as a case. RCA builds on central elements of CAS theory, while it is conceptually based on philosophy of technology. We raise the question whether attempts to use natural adaptive behaviour of animals as an integral part in the functioning of LPS, sufficiently protects these animals from being subjected to a process of concretization. We argue that integrating animal specific adaptive behaviour in the structural system design adds extra complexity to the system and is expected to lead to intensified management pressure and an increase in technological control measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bos, A.P. (2008). Instrumentalization Theory and Reflexive Design in Animal Husbandry. Social Epistemology 22: 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, B., Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G. and Groenestein, K. (2003). A novel design approach for livestock housing based on recursive control--with examples to reduce environmental pollution. Livestock Production Science 84: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Bellon, S., Dedieu, B. and Milestad, R. (2010). Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30: 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lauwere, C. and Luttik, J. (2004). Wageningen UR Projectteam Houden van Hennen. Laying hen husbandry: towards a happy hen life, proud farmers and a satisfied society. In Wageningen UR Projectteam Houden van Hennen. Laying hen husbandry: towards a happy hen life, proud farmers and a satisfied society. [Wageningen]: Wageningen UR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London [etc.]: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and technology; essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. (1992). Complex Adaptive Systems. Daedalus 121: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanis, E., De Greef, K.H., Hiemstra, A. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M. (2005). Breeding for societally important traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 83: 948–957.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanis, E., Van den belt, H., Groen, A.F., Schakel, J. and De Greef K.H. (2004). Breeding for improved welfare in pigs: A conceptual framework and its use in practice. Animal science 78: 315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerkx, L., Aarts, N. and Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103: 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidgen, H. (2005). Thinking technological and biological beings: Gilbert Simondon’s philosophy of machines. Revista do Departamento de Psicologia. UFF 17: 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (1989). Du mode d’existence des objets technique. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, L., Ellen, E.D., Uitdehaag, K. and Brom, F.W.A. (2008). A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: poultry as an example. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 21: 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Napel, J., Bianchi, F. and Bestman, M. (2006). Utilising intrinsic robustness in agricultural production systems. TransForum working papers, no.1, Zoetermeer: 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Napel, J., Van der Veen, A.A., Oosting, S.J. and Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G. (2011). A conceptual approach to design livestock production systems for robustness to enhance sustainability. Livestock Science 139: 150–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walstra, I., Ten Napel, J., Kemp, B., Schipper, H. and Van den Brand, H. (2010). Early life experiences affect the adaptive capacity of rearing hens during infectious challenges. animal 4: 1688–1696.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. De Goede .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Goede, D.M., Gremmen, B., Blom-Zandstra, M. (2012). Adaptive capacities from an animal welfare perspective. In: Potthast, T., Meisch, S. (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics