Abstract
In 2010 the Report of the second International Commission on Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (OVP) was published. This international committee evaluated the management of one of the largest wetland reserves in the Netherlands. The results of this evaluation were of high public interest, because the OVP is a controversially debated topic in the Netherlands. This debate has mainly resulted from the introduction of a number of large herbivores to this area, such as Heck cattle, konik horses, and red deer, to maintain short grassland for grazing by geese. This measure had been taken as part of the initial management style of minimal intervention in the OVP, in order to allow ‘natural ecological processes to operate’ within the area. However, this non-intervention policy elicited a fierce debate on our duty of care towards these animals, when the harsh winter of 2009/2010 resulted in an unusually high winter-mortality among large herbivores. Are these animals to be considered part of nature, with animals suffering and dying by starvation as a part of natural processes? Or are they to be treated as kept animals towards which we have direct duties to prevent harm and suffering? On top of this problem, the question arises whether one should assess these dilemmas from the perspective of the individual animal or from a population-oriented perspective. Up until recently, these questions were – at the level of policy – mainly discussed as rather technical issues that demand further ecological expertise or input from veterinary and animal sciences to be solved. The ICMO2 evaluation explicitly tried to include the moral dimensions in their scientific evaluation. In this paper we present the framework that has been used in order to explicate and structure the ethical questions that play a central role in the management of the OVP. This framework offers a tool for practical ethical deliberation and aims to provide room for fundamental ethical presumptions and moral ideals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Drenthen, M., Keulartz, J. and Proctor, J. (eds.) (2009). New Visions of Nature: Complexity and Authenticity. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Gerechtshof (2007). Nederlandse vereniging tot bescherming van dieren vs. de staat der Nederlanden, 06/614 KG, www.rechtsspraak.nl. Accessed 5 January 2012.
ICMO, (2006). Reconciling Nature and human interests, report of the International Committe on the Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (ICMO), Wageningen UR – WING rapport 018, The Hague/ Wageningen.
ICMO2, (2010). Natural processes, animal welfare, moral aspects and management of the Oostvaardersplassen. Report of the second International Commission on Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (ICMO2). Wing rapport 039 The Hague/Wageningen.
Kay, R.N.B. (1979). Seasonal Changes of Appetite in Sheep and Deer. Agricultural Research Council Research Review for 1979.
Keulartz J., Van der Windt, H. and Swart, J. (2004). The Case of Dutch Nature Policy. Concepts of Nature as Communicative Devices. Environmental values. 13: 81–99.
McEwen, L.S., French, C.E., Magruder, N.D., Swift, R.W. and Ingram, R.H. (1957). Nutrient requirements of the white-tailed deer. Transactions of the 22nd North American Wildlife Conference, pp. 119–132.
Ohl, F. and Van der Staay, F.J. (2012). Animal welfare – at the interface between science and society, The Veterinary Journal, in press.
Rawls, J. (1972), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RDA/ Council on Animal Affairs (2010). Moral issues and public policy on animals. An Opinion of the Council on Animal Affairs, the Netherlands, RDA 2010/01.
SBB (2010). Key role for the large grazers, www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/English/Oostvaardersplassen/Key%20role%20for%20the%20large%20grazers.aspx. Accessed 23 December 2011.
Swart, J.A.A. and Keulartz, J. (2011) The wild animal in our society. A contextual approach to the intrinsic value of animals. Acta Biotheoretica 59: 185–200.
Van der Burg, W. and Van Willigenburg, T. (eds.) (1998), Reflective Equilibrium. Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meijboom, F.L.B., Ohl, F. (2012). Managing nature parks as an ethical challenge: a proposal for a practical tool to identify fundamental questions. In: Potthast, T., Meisch, S. (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_17
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-753-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)