Skip to main content

Managing nature parks as an ethical challenge: a proposal for a practical tool to identify fundamental questions

  • Chapter
Climate change and sustainable development
  • 3877 Accesses

Abstract

In 2010 the Report of the second International Commission on Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (OVP) was published. This international committee evaluated the management of one of the largest wetland reserves in the Netherlands. The results of this evaluation were of high public interest, because the OVP is a controversially debated topic in the Netherlands. This debate has mainly resulted from the introduction of a number of large herbivores to this area, such as Heck cattle, konik horses, and red deer, to maintain short grassland for grazing by geese. This measure had been taken as part of the initial management style of minimal intervention in the OVP, in order to allow ‘natural ecological processes to operate’ within the area. However, this non-intervention policy elicited a fierce debate on our duty of care towards these animals, when the harsh winter of 2009/2010 resulted in an unusually high winter-mortality among large herbivores. Are these animals to be considered part of nature, with animals suffering and dying by starvation as a part of natural processes? Or are they to be treated as kept animals towards which we have direct duties to prevent harm and suffering? On top of this problem, the question arises whether one should assess these dilemmas from the perspective of the individual animal or from a population-oriented perspective. Up until recently, these questions were – at the level of policy – mainly discussed as rather technical issues that demand further ecological expertise or input from veterinary and animal sciences to be solved. The ICMO2 evaluation explicitly tried to include the moral dimensions in their scientific evaluation. In this paper we present the framework that has been used in order to explicate and structure the ethical questions that play a central role in the management of the OVP. This framework offers a tool for practical ethical deliberation and aims to provide room for fundamental ethical presumptions and moral ideals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Drenthen, M., Keulartz, J. and Proctor, J. (eds.) (2009). New Visions of Nature: Complexity and Authenticity. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerechtshof (2007). Nederlandse vereniging tot bescherming van dieren vs. de staat der Nederlanden, 06/614 KG, www.rechtsspraak.nl. Accessed 5 January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMO, (2006). Reconciling Nature and human interests, report of the International Committe on the Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (ICMO), Wageningen UR – WING rapport 018, The Hague/ Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMO2, (2010). Natural processes, animal welfare, moral aspects and management of the Oostvaardersplassen. Report of the second International Commission on Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (ICMO2). Wing rapport 039 The Hague/Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R.N.B. (1979). Seasonal Changes of Appetite in Sheep and Deer. Agricultural Research Council Research Review for 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz J., Van der Windt, H. and Swart, J. (2004). The Case of Dutch Nature Policy. Concepts of Nature as Communicative Devices. Environmental values. 13: 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, L.S., French, C.E., Magruder, N.D., Swift, R.W. and Ingram, R.H. (1957). Nutrient requirements of the white-tailed deer. Transactions of the 22nd North American Wildlife Conference, pp. 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohl, F. and Van der Staay, F.J. (2012). Animal welfare – at the interface between science and society, The Veterinary Journal, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RDA/ Council on Animal Affairs (2010). Moral issues and public policy on animals. An Opinion of the Council on Animal Affairs, the Netherlands, RDA 2010/01.

    Google Scholar 

  • SBB (2010). Key role for the large grazers, www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/English/Oostvaardersplassen/Key%20role%20for%20the%20large%20grazers.aspx. Accessed 23 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, J.A.A. and Keulartz, J. (2011) The wild animal in our society. A contextual approach to the intrinsic value of animals. Acta Biotheoretica 59: 185–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Burg, W. and Van Willigenburg, T. (eds.) (1998), Reflective Equilibrium. Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. L. B. Meijboom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meijboom, F.L.B., Ohl, F. (2012). Managing nature parks as an ethical challenge: a proposal for a practical tool to identify fundamental questions. In: Potthast, T., Meisch, S. (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics