Skip to main content

Science without God

  • Chapter
Sacred Science?
  • 772 Accesses

Abstract

From the very birth of modern science in the seventeenth century there has been tension between science and religion. This tension is symbolized by the trial of one of the founding fathers of modern science, Galileo Galilei. His defense of Copernicus’s heliocentric system was condemned by the Catholic Church as heresy. He was forced to withdraw his assertions that the sun is the center of the universe and does not move, and that the earth is not the center of the universe and moves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Both translations retrieved from http://www.biblegateway.com/.

  2. 2.

    Perhaps the first to point out this was the historian of science Alexandre Koyre (Koyre 1978). He influenced Edmund Husserl, who called it “Verhangnisvolle Missverstandnisse als Folgen der Unklarheit uber den Sinn der Mathematisierung” (Husserl 1962: 54) (“Portentous misunderstandings resulting from lack of clarity about the meaning of mathematization”, Husserl 1970: 53). It is the main point in Paul Feyerabend’s posthumously published book Conquest of Abundance (1999).

  3. 3.

    The selection of traits that are beneficial to the group, and not to the individuals, is called group selection. Many evolutionary biologists have argued that group selection is incompatible with Darwinism. According to their view, Darwinism only permits two kinds of altruism: kin altruism and reciprocal altruism. Kin altruism is to act altruistically towards close relatives, who share many of the genes, and reciprocal altruism is following the rule: “I scratch your back, and you scratch mine”. Reciprocal altruism is not really altruism; it is more enlightened egoism: I do someone a favor if I am relatively certain that it will be paid back. The problem is that religion does not fit into any of these categories. Therefore, Richard Dawkins gives an alternative evolutionary explanation in The God Delusion.

Bibliography

  • Brecht, B. 2007. Life of Galileo. Translated by W. Sauerlander … R. Manheirn. Retrieved from http://buehnenkunst.bu.ohost.de.

  • Copernicus, N. 1990 [1543]. On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1971 [1641]. Meditations, in R. Descartes: Discourse on Method and the Meditations. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinesen, I. (Karen Blixen). 2002 [1937]. Out of Africa. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. 1999. Conquest of Abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G. 1957 [1623]. The Assayer. In S. Drake (ed.). Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday … Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G. 1970 [1630]. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. 1986. A Brief History of Time. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1962. Die Krisis der europaischen Wissenschaften und die tranzendentale Phäsnomenologie. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1970. The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. 1978 [1939]. Galileo Studies. London: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E. 1998. Galileo on science and scripture. In P. Machamer (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 271–347.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. 1971. Chance and Necessity. An essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. 1982. “Subtle is the Lord…”: the Science and the Life of Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondi, P. 1998. From Galileo to Augustine. In P. Machamer (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 175–210.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, G.L. 1998. The Science of God. The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 1990. Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Tte Free Press. Wilson, E. 1979. On Human Nature. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ragnar Fjelland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fjelland, R. (2012). Science without God. In: Øyen, S.A., Lund-Olsen, T., Vaage, N.S. (eds) Sacred Science?. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-752-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics