Skip to main content

Scientific worldviews, religious minds

Some introductory reflections

  • Chapter
  • 816 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout most of the history of science, academic practice has been regarded as a fundamentally rational process. But is it really that rational? When the first universities in Europe were founded in the twelfth century, a ceremony resembling the modern doctoral defenses was quickly established. The candidate was presented with two opponents, who examined the strengths and weaknesses of his dissertation. Apart from the removal of a somewhat barbarian precaution – the candidate’s oath included a promise not to try and kill the opponents should he fail – the structure of the doctoral defenses has not changed significantly to this day. The ceremonial structure closely resembles that of religious rites of passage. The traditionalist nature of the doctoral defence not only illustrates that the university is a conservative institution, but also how it is interrelated with the world of symbols, rituals and ceremonies (Krogh et al. 2003). What are the most salient symbols of academia today? This question is too complex to be answered in a few sentences, but there seems to us to be a strong inclination in our time towards what Fisher called the “symbols of achievement” (Fisher in Jegerstedt 2011). Success is primarily measured by the number of publications and prizes, funding and international rankings, which seem to be valued over actual achievement. This illustrates how rituals and symbols remain at the core of modern life and are defining aspects of academia – the institution which is the actual symbol of the rationalization and the secularization of Western societies (Weber).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Berger, P. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. & F. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. 2008. The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. 2011. The Tyranny of Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. 2009. Capitalist Realism. Is There No Alternative? Winchester, UK and Washington DC: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegerstedt, K. 2011. “Teaching in the End Times”: Humaniora og kunnskapsproduksjon i globaliseringens tidsalder. In S. Øyen et al. (eds.). Humanioras fremtid. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske Forlag. 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogh, T. et al. 2003. Historie, forståelse og fortolkning. De historisk-filosofiske fags fremvekst og arbeidsmåter. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Los Angeles: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simen Andersen Øyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Øyen, S.A., Vaage, N.S., Lund-Olsen, T. (2012). Scientific worldviews, religious minds. In: Øyen, S.A., Lund-Olsen, T., Vaage, N.S. (eds) Sacred Science?. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-752-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics