Skip to main content

The role of economics in motivating farmers to improve udder health

  • Chapter
Udder Health and Communication

Abstract

Economics is about allocating scarce resources between competing activities to achieve often conflicting objectives within constraints. It applies from farm to global level. As udder health affects the economics of Society as well as the farm business, it will be used to guide policy interventions and market incentives that motivate farmers to improve udder health as well as providing farmers themselves with associated decision support in their own economic interest. Changing agricultural policies that increase the exposure of farmers to global market forces and yet require them to address Society’s objectives for higher standards of animal welfare, food quality, safety, security at minimum damage to the environment during a period of increased uncertainty enhances the role of economics. This paper addresses these issues and highlights some of the challenges for economics in motivating farmers to improve udder health in this context. These challenges include providing farm specific decision support in real time, dealing with information shortage and overload, allowing for trade-offs between long and short run goals, managing risk and the need to establish improved udder health within a whole farm context. Tools to address these challenges are briefly described by example. These range from basic cost-benefit analysis of competing udder health activities and diagrammatic representations of trade-offs through to interdisciplinary studies combining biological and economic models with operational research techniques and economic theory to establish the impacts of improved udder health on international trade and on the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashworth CJ, Toma LM, Hunter MG (2009) Nutritional effects on oocyte and embryo development in mammals implications for reproductive efficiency and environmental sustainability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364:3351–3361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar D, Tauer LW, Bennett G, Gonzalez RN, Hertl JA, Schulte HF, Schukken YH, Welcome FL, Grohn YT (2008) Use of a dynamic programming model to estimate the value of clinical mastitis treatment and prevention options utilized by dairy producers. Agricultural Systems 99:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates TW, Thurmond MC, Carpenter TE (2001) Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep and Swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. American Journal of Veterinary Research 62:1121–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. and IJpelaar, J., 2003. Economic Assessment of Livestock Diseases in Great Britain. Final Report to Defra, London. Available at: http://www.apd.rdg.ac.uk/AgEcon/livestockdisease/lstockdisfinrepRMB.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2011.

  • Defra, 2004. Animal health and welfare strategy for Great Britain. Available at: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/policy/animalhealth/strategy/ahws.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2011.

  • Donaldson A, Lowe P, Ward N (2002) Virus-crisis-institutional change: The foot and mouth actor network and the governance of rural affairs in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis 42:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2007. A new animal health strategy for the European Union where ‘prevention is better than cure’. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/diseases/strategy/docs/animal_health_strategy_en.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2011.

  • Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming. 2011. Executive Summary. The Government Office for Science, London. Available at: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/bispartners/foresight/docs/food-and-farming/11-547-future-of-food-and-farming-summary.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2011.

  • Gill M, Smith P, Wilkinson JM (2010) Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock. Animal 4:323–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halasa T, Huijps K, Osteras O, Hogeveen H (2007) Economic effects of bovine mastitis management: a review. Veterinary Quarterly 29:18–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halasa T, Nielen M, Huirne RBM, Hogeveen H (2009) Stochastic bio-economic model of bovine intramammary infection. Livestock Science 124:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halasa T, Nielen M, van Werven T, Hogeveen H (2010) A simulation model to calculate costs and benefits of dry period interventions in dairy cattle. Livestock Science 129:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. and Baldock, D., 2011. Greening the CAP: Delivering environmental outcomes through pillar one. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London. Available at: http://www.ieep.eu/assets/831/Greening_Pillar_1_IEEP_Thinkpiece_-_Final.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2011.

  • Heffernan C, Misturelli F, Nielsen L, Gunn GJ, Yu J (2009) Analysis of Pan-European attitudes to the eradication and control of bovine viral diarrhoea. Veterinary Record 164:163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan C, Nielsen L, Thomson K, Gunn GJ (2008) An exploration of the drivers to bio-security collective action among a sample of UK cattle and sheep farmers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 87:358–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogeveen H, Huijps K, Lam TJGM (2011) Economic aspects of mastitis: New developments. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 59:16–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houben EHP, Huirne RBM, Dijkhuizen AA (1994) Optimal replacement of mastitic cows determined by a hierarchic markov process. Journal of Dairy Science 77:2975–2993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson C (2011) Understanding the factors affecting dairy cow fertility. Veterinary Record 168:299–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huijps K, Hogeveen H, Lam TJGM, aned Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., (2010) Costs and efficacy of management measures to improve udder health on Dutch dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 93:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijps K, Lam TJGM, Hogeveen H (2008) Costs of mastitis: facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75:113–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen J, Renes RJ, Lam TJGM (2010) Evaluation of two communication strategies to improve udder health management. Journal of Dairy Science 93:604–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Losinger WC (2005) Economic impacts of reduced milk production associated with an increase in bulk-tank somatic cell count on US dairies. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226:1652–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney J (1996) Old economics for new problems – livestock disease: Presidential address. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47:295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney JP, Howe KS, Schepers JA (1992) A framework for the economic analysis of disease in farm livestock. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 13:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson A, Honhold N, Taylor N, Ramirez A, Romero P, Peel M, Hullinger P, Mansley L (2003) A quantitative insight into ‘biosecurity’: a case-control study investigating the risk factors predisposing Cumbrian dairy farms to foot and mouth disease. In: Thrusfield MV, Goodall EA (eds) Proceedings of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. University of Glasgow, Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, pp 208–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritson C (1978) Agricultural economics principles and policy. Crosby Lockwood Staples, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarossa JM, Stott AW, Humphry RW, Gunn GJ (2005) Optimal risk management versus willingness to pay for BVDV control options. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 72:183–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santarossa JM, Stott AW, Woolliams JA, Brotherstone S, Wall E, Coffey MP (2004) An economic evaluation of long-term sustainability in the dairy sector. Animal Science 79:315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott AW, Gunn GJ (2008) Use of a benefit function to assess the relative investment potential of alternative farm animal disease prevention strategies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 84:179–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stott AW (2009) Optimising methods for assessing policy decisions on endemic diseases. In: Rushton J (ed) The economics of animal health and production. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott AW, Humphry RW, Gunn GJ (2010) Modelling the effects of previous infection and re-infection on the costs of bovine viral diarrhoea outbreaks in beef herds. Veterinary Journal 185:138–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stott AW, Jones GM, Gunn GJ, Chase-Topping M, Humphry RW, Richardson H, Logue DN (2002) Optimum replacement policies for the control of subclinical mastitis due to S. aureus in dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53:627–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott AW, Jones GM, Humphry RW, Gunn GJ (2005) The financial incentive to control paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) on UK dairy farms. Veterinary Record 156:825–831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stott AW, Lloyd J, Humphry RW, Gunn GJ (2003) A linear programming approach to estimate the economic impact of bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) at the whole-farm level in Scotland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 59:51–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C (1995) Assessing the approach to cost-benefit analysis of controlling livestock diseases of McInerney and others. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 22 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Borne BHP, Halasa T, Van Schaik G, Hogeveen H, Nielen M (2010) Bioeconomic modeling of lactational antimicrobial treatment of new bovine subclinical intramammary infections caused by contagious pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science 93:4034–4044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams HP (2008) Model building in mathematical programming. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 354 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin C, Stott AW, Logue DN, Gunn J (1999) The economic impact of mastitis-control procedures used in Scottish dairy herds with high bulk-tank somatic cell counts. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 41:135–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda L, Buelow KL, Nordlund KV, Thomas CB, Collins MT, Goodger WJ (1998) A linear programming assessment of the profit from strategies to reduce the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 33:183–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. W. Stott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stott, A.W. (2011). The role of economics in motivating farmers to improve udder health. In: Hogeveen, H., Lam, T.J.G.M. (eds) Udder Health and Communication. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-742-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics