Abstract
Two coat phenotypes exist in alpaca: the Huacaya and the Suri. The two coats have different textile characteristics and different prices on the market. Although present scientific knowledge suggests a simple genetic model of inheritance, there is a tendency to manage and consider the two phenotypes as two different breeds. A 14-microsatellite panel was used in this study to assess genetic distance between Suri and Huacaya alpacas in a sample of non-related animals from two phenotypically pure flocks at the Illpa-Puno experimental station in Quimsachata, Peru. The animals are part of a germplasm established approximately 20 years ago and have been bred separately according to their coat type since then. Genetic variability parameters were also calculated. The codominant data was statistically analysed using the software Genalex 6.3, Phylip 3.69 and Fstat 2.9.3.2. The sample was tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and after strict Bonferroni correction only one locus (LCA37) showed deviation from equilibrium (P < 0.05). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was also tested and 9 loci associations showed significant disequilibrium. Observed heterozygosis (Ho = 0.766; SE = 0.044), expected heterozygosis (He = 0.769; SE = 0.033), number of alleles (Na = 9.667, SE = 0.772) and Fixation index (F = 0.004; SE = 0.036) are comparable to data from previous studies. Measures of genetic distance were 0.06 for Nei’s and 0.03 for Cavalli-Sforza’s. The analysis of molecular variance reported no existing variance between populations. Considering the origin of the animals, their post domestication evolution and the reproductive practices in place, the results suggest that there is no genetic differentiation between the two populations for the studied loci.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antonini M., F. Perdomici, S. Catalano, E.N. Frank, M. Gonzales, M.V.H. Hick and F. Castrignanò, 2001. Cuticular cell mean scale frequency in different types of fleece of domestic South American camelids (SAC). In: M. Gerken and C. Renieri (eds.), Progress in South American Camelids Research, Proceedings of the 3 rd European Symposium and SUPREME European Seminar, 27-29 May 1999, 2001, EAAP110-116.
Baychelier P., 2002. What is a pure Suri? Alpacas Australia, 39: 30-33.
Bustamante A.V., A. Zambelli, D.A. De Lamo, J. von Thungen and L. Vidal-Rioja, 2002. Genetic variability of guanaco and llama populations in Argentina. Small Ruminant Research, 44: 97-101.
Felsenstein J., 1989. Notices; PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics, 5: 164-166.
Frank E.N., M.V.H. Hick, C.D. Gauna, H.E. Lamas, C. Renieri and M. Antonini, 2006. Phenotypic and genetic description of fibre traits in South American domestic camelids (llamas and alpacas). Small Ruminant Research, 61: 113-129.
Goudet J., 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86: 485-486.
Lang K.D.M., Y. Wang and Y. Plante, 1996. Fifteen polymorphic dinucleotide microsatellites in llamas and alpacas. Animal Genetics, 27: 293.
Laval G., M. SanCristobal and C. Chevalet, 2002. Measuring genetic distances between breeds: use of some distances in various short term evolution models. Genetics, selection, evolution, 34: 481-507.
Mason I.L., 1973. The role of natural and artificial selection in the origin of breeds of farm animals. Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 90: 229-244.
McGregor B.A. and K.L. Butler, 2004. Sources of variation in fibre diameter attributes of Australian alpacas and implications for fleece evaluation and animal selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55: 433-442.
McGregor B.A., 2006. Production, attributes and relative value of alpaca fleeces in southern Australia and implications for industry development. Small Ruminant Research, 61: 93-111.
McPartlan H.C., M.E. Matthews and N.A. Robinson, 1998. Alpaca microsatellites at the VIAS A1 and VIAS A2 loci. Animal Genetics, 29: 158-159.
Munyard K.A., J.M. Ledger, C.Y. Lee, C. Babra and D.M. Groth, 2009. Characterization and multiplex genotyping of alpaca tetranucleotide microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Research, 85: 153-156.
Park S.D.E., 2001. Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection. Thesis, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Peakall R. and P.E. Smouse, 2006. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6: 288-295.
Penedo M.C.T., A.R. Caetano and K.I. Cordova, 1998. Microsatellite markers for South American camelids. Animal Genetics, 29: 411-412.
Penedo M.C., A.R. Caetano and K. Cordova, 1999a. Eight microsatellite markers for South American camelids. Animal Genetics, 30: 166-167.
Penedo M.C., A.R. Caetano and K.I. Cordova, 1999b. Six microsatellite markers for South American camelids. Animal Genetics, 30: 399.
Ponzoni R.W., D.J. Hubbard, R.V. Kenyon, C.D. Tuckwell, B.A. McGregor, A. Howse, I. Carmichael and G.J. Judson, 1997. Phenotypes resulting from Huacaya by Huacaya, Suri by Huacaya and Suri by Suri crossings, In: Proceedings of the twelfth Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 6-10 April 1997 1997, AAABG136-139.
Presciuttini S., A. Valbonesi, N. Apaza, M. Antonini, T. Huanca and C. Renieri, 2010. Fleece variation in alpaca (Vicugna pacos): a two-locus model for the Suri/Huacaya phenotype. BMC genetics, 11: 70.
Qiu J., T.E. Mitchell, A.P. Nickel, S.R. Brummet and W.E. Johnson, 2006. Identification and Characterization of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Alpaca (Lamapacos), In: Plant and Animal Genome XIV Conference Abstracts, 14-18 January 2006, National Center of Plant Gene Research (NCPGR)P134.
Reed K.M. and L.D. Chaves, 2008. Simple sequence repeats for genetic studies of alpaca. Animal Biotechnology, 19: 243-309.
Sarno R.J., V.A. David, W.L. Franklin, S.J. O’Brien and W.E. Johnson, 2000. Development of microsatellite markers in the guanaco, Lama guanicoe: utility for South American camelids. Molecular ecology, 9: 1922-1924.
Wheeler J.C., L. Chikhi and M.W. Bruford, 2006. Genetic Analysis ofthe Origins of Domestic South American Camelids. In: M.A. Zeder, D.G. Bradley, E. Emshwiller and B.D. Smith (eds.), Documenting domestication: new genetic and archaeological paradigms. University of California Press, Berkely, CA, USA, pp. 331-343.
Wheeler J.C., M. Fernández, R. Rosadio, D. Hoces, M. Kadwell and M.W. Buford, 2003. Genetic diversity and management implications for vicuña populations in Peru. In: J. Lemons, R. Victor and D. Schaffer (eds.), Conserving biodiversity in arid regions: Best practices in developing nations. Kluwer Acadademic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 327-344.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the LGS laboratories for carrying out the multiplex amplifications and band scoring.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manna, V.L. et al. (2011). A microsatellite study on the genetic distance between Suri and Huacaya phenotypes in Peruvian alpaca (Vicugna pacos) . In: Pérez-Cabal, M.Á., Gutiérrez, J.P., Cervantes, I., Alcalde, M.J. (eds) Fibre production in South American camelids and other fibre animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-727-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-727-1_20
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-727-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
