Skip to main content

Action research in a regional development setting: students as boundary workers in a learning multi-actor network

  • Chapter
Knowledge in action

Part of the book series: Mansholt Publication Series ((MAUSHOLT,volume 11))

  • 496 Accesses

Abstract

The educational experimental project ‘Bridge to the Future’, which took place between 2002 and 2007, aimed primarily at supporting the regional development process by action- oriented student research. The second aim was to develop students’ roles as boundary workers in the co-creation of knowledge in a regional setting. Our basic assumption, like Gaventa and Cornwall (2001), is that collaborative research is empowering and innovative because it links science and society in such a way that it involves peoples’ own critical reflection and learning. Actors’ roles need to be redefined during this process. This causes uncertainty which needs coaching and facilitation. The ‘Bridge to the Future’ project started with a kick-off meeting in the area with regional stakeholders, students, supervisors and a project leader. The integrated research question developed there represented the complexity of the regional issues and provided an interdisciplinary starting point for the students who had to conduct their thesis-research in the framework of the collaborative project. As such the research question became a boundary object, which created possibilities for communication, interaction, learning and reflection. During monthly meetings different viewpoints were exchanged and discussed in a multi-stakeholder setting, which slowly developed into a learning community, providing a base and network for regional actors to develop plans collaboratively. As boundary workers the students and their research empowered the people from the area and provided a stronger sense of identity. Important impact of the project in the area is a LEADER network, rural art and rural tourism projects, international exchange visits and the actual development of biomass installations. We conclude that collaborative landscape research can be valuable if actors learn to take on new roles, are supported in creating boundary objects, organise reflection and are able to develop new knowledge, for sustainable development and the management of landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A collaboration between Wageningen University and the agricultural colleges Van Hall and Larenstein in the Netherlands.

  2. 2.

    One of the supervisors and the project leader are authors of this chapter.

  3. 3.

    WSI is a rural regional platform foundation, consisting of a broad range of regional stakeholders.

  4. 4.

    LAG=Local Action Group, consisting of max 50% formal representation, and at least 50% informal local representation. The LAG formulates policy advice considering rural regional policy and is financed for 50% by EU rural LEADER policy.

  5. 5.

    ENLDT: European Network for Local Development Teams.

  6. 6.

    For example, research on the small-scale water storage in the area, and other water management issues.

References

  • Beers, P.J., J. Sol and A. Wals, 2010. Social learning in a multi-actor innovation context. Paper presented at the International Farming Systems Association conference, Vienna, Austria (3-7 July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockbank, A. and I. McGill, 2006. Facilitating Reflective Learning Through Mentoring & Coaching. Kogan Page, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, P., 2006. Action Research and Network Development: Creating Actionable Knowledge. Centre for Regional Innovation and Competitiveness (CRIC). University of Ballarat, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D.W., W.C. Clark, F. Alcock, N.M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D.H. Guston, J. Jager, R.B. Mitchell, 2003. Knowledge Systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 100: 8086-8091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D. and T. Branninck, 2010. Doing action research in your own organization. Sage Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. and A.E.J. Wals, 2006. On the danger of blurring methods, methodologies and ideologies in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research 12: 549-558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derkzen, P., 2009. Geleerd in het Westerkwartier. Een onderwijsproject in een dynamische regio 2003-2008. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands [in Dutch].

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, V.J., 2001. Action Science: Creating Communities of Inquiry in Communities of Practice. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, pp. 159-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. and A. Cornwall, 2001. Power and knowledge. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, pp. 70-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerling-Eiff, F., H. Kupper, M. De Beuze and A. Wals, 2007. Steen in het water. Een handreiking voor het werken met kennisarrangementen. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands [in Dutch].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., 2001. Theory and Practice: The Mediating Discourse. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, pp. 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibwika, P., 2006. Learning to make change. Developing innovation competence for recreating the African university of the 21st century. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons, 2001. Re-thinking science; knowledge and the public in the age of uncertainty. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. and H. Bradbury (eds.), 2008. Handbook of action research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regeer, B.J., 2009. Making the invisible visible. Analysing the development of strategies and changes in knowledge production to deal with persistent problems in sustainable development. Uitgeverij Boxpress, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkassian, W., D. Hurford and C. Wenmann, 2010. Creative Community Planning, Transformative Engagement Methods for Working at the Edge. Earthscan, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. and C.O. Scharmer, 2006. Community Action Research: Learning as a community of Practitioners, Consultants and Researchers. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, pp. 238-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress, B., G. Tress, A. van der Valk and G. Fry, 2003. Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies: Potentials and limitations. Delta series 2. Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout, E., M. Hisschemöller and H. Eijsackers, 2007. Ecological Indicators: Between the two fires of science and policy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Mierlo, B., B. Regeer, M. Van Amstel, M. Van Arkesteijn, V. Beekman, J. Bunders, T. Cock Buning,. B. de Elzen, A.C Hoes and C. Leeuwis, 2010. Reflexieve Monitoring in actie. Handvatten voor de monitoring van systeeminnovatieprojecten. Wageningen Universiteit en Vrije Universiteit. Uitgeverij Boxpress, Amsterdam, the Netherlands [in Dutch].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A.E.J. (ed.), 2009. Social learning towards a sustainable world. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiskerke, J.S.C., 2007. Robust Regions. Dynamics, connectedness, and diversity in the metropolitane landscape. Inaugural Speech, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research activities were conducted in the context of the educational innovation project called ‘Bridge to the Future’ in the period 2002-2007. The project was implemented by a project team consisting of lecturers from van Hall-Larenstein, Wageningen University and an external project leader. The project was financed by a one-year innovation fund from Wageningen University. It was then extended for a further three years. The experience, the results and the reflection on the process led to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jifke Sol .

Editor information

Annemarie van Paassen Jolanda van den Berg Eveliene Steingröver Renate Werkman Bas Pedroli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sol, J., Beers, P.J., Oosting, S., Geerling-Eiff, F. (2011). Action research in a regional development setting: students as boundary workers in a learning multi-actor network. In: van Paassen, A., van den Berg, J., Steingröver, E., Werkman, R., Pedroli, B. (eds) Knowledge in action. Mansholt Publication Series, vol 11. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-724-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics