Skip to main content

What is collaborative landscape research about?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Mansholt Publication Series ((MAUSHOLT,volume 11))

Abstract

Many different landscape research approaches involve some form of collaboration between researchers with different disciplinary backgrounds or between these researchers and societal actors. Often, however, the underlying theoretical assumptions behind these approaches and corresponding research goals and intended societal outcomes are not made explicit. These goals and intended outcomes do however require different forms of stakeholder participation, representing various degrees of sharing responsibilities and powers concerning the collaborative research process between researchers and societal stakeholders. Taking the theoretical perspectives, aims and goals and types of stakeholder participation into account, we distinguish between four general types of collaborative research approaches in landscape research. These types reflect the increasing engagement of researchers in processes of societal and institutional change. The case chapters in this book reflect this gamut of collaborative research types. In each of them, the authors describe and reflect on the theories and methods they used, the contribution to societal development they intended to achieve, the challenges or difficulties they encountered, the actual outcomes they achieved and the lessons they learned. The cases thus provide a valuable knowledge base for a comparative analysis of the collaborative practices and research roles employed and of the adequacy of the theories and methodologies practiced. The insights derived are used in the last chapter for the formulation of practical recommendations for those who want to engage in collaborative research for landscape development and governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An online questionnaire was sent to 161 researchers working for Wageningen University or an applied research institute of Wageningen UR. The response rate was 33% (a total of 48 completed questionnaires).

References

  • Allen, W.J., 2001. Working together for environmental management: the role of information sharing and collaborative learning. PhD (Development Studies), Massey University, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J., 2003. Uniting science and participation in the process of innovation – research for development. In: Pound, B., S.S. Snapp, C. McDougall and A. Braun (eds.), Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation. Earthscan, London, UK, pp. 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, G., 2002. Commentary on the Challenge to Change: Participatory Research and Professional Realities. Society and Natural Resources 15: 847-852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S.D., 1989. Resource-poor Farmer Participation in Research: A Synthesis of Experiences from Nine Agricultural Research Systems. OFCOR Comparative Study Paper No 3, ISNAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P.R., 2002. Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge at boundaries. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D.W., W.C. Clark, F. Alcock, N.M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D.H. Guston, J. J臠er and R.B. Mitchell, 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100 (14): 8086-8091.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C. and P. Johnson, 2006. Action research: Explaining the diversity. Human Relations 59: 783-814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. and C. Huxham, 1996. Action research for the study of Organizations. In: S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds.), The handbook of Organization Studies. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, USA, pp. 526-542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. and N.R.A. Romm, 1995. Enhancing te process of methodology choice in Total Systems Intervention (TSA) and improving chances for tackling coercion. Systems Practice 8 (4): 377-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, G., 2001. Multifunctional landscapes-towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 159-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S.O. and J.R. Ravetz, 1993. Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures 25: 739-755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. and H. Nowotny, 2001. The potential of transdisciplinarity. In: J.T. Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Masuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz and M. Welti (eds.), Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkh舫ser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 67-80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trow, 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. and M. Levin, 2007. Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., 1992. Dialogue and development. Van Gorcum, Assen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., 2003. New forms of knowledge production and the role of action research. Action Research 1: 153-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, B., J. Van den Berg, A. Van Paassen and R.A. Werkman, 2009. The state of the art of collaborative research in landscape development: examples from the Netherlands. Paper prepared for the International conference ‘Towards Knowledge Democracy’, Leiden, the Netherlands, August 25-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, A., 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindon, S., R. Pain and M. Kesby (eds.), 2007. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerkx, L. and C. Leeuwis, 2009. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76: 849-860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klerkx, L., A. Hall and C. Leeuwis, 2009. Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8 (5/6): 409438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N., 2004. The three threats of action research: a discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study. Decision Support Systems 37: 265-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., 1988. Action research: principles and practices. MacMillan, London, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., P. Lomax and J. Whitehead, 2003. You and your action research project. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollinga, P.P., 2008. The rational organization of dissent; boundary concepts, boundary objects and boundary settings in the interdisciplinarity study of natural resources management. ZEF (Center for Development Research), Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons, 2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Blackwell, Malden, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., 1996. What is participatory research? In: D. Narayan (ed.), Toward Participatory Research. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 17-30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nyden, P. and W. Wiewel, 1992. Collaborative research: harnessing the tensions between researcher and practitioner. American Sociologist 23 (4): 43-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493-535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, C., 2008. From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science and Policy 11: 46-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, K. and J. Hagmann, with contributions from M. Fernandez and J.A. Ashby, 2003. Understanding Participatory Research in the Context of Natural Resource Management: Paradigms, Approaches and Typologies. ODI-AGREN Network Paper No. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. and H. Bradbury, 2006. Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, London, UK, pp. 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regeer, B.J., 2009. Making the invisible visible: Analysing the development of strategies and changes in knowledge production to deal with persistent problems in sustainable development. PhD Thesis Free University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regeer, B.J. and J.F.G. Bunders, 2009. Knowledge co-creation: Interaction between science and society, A transdisciplinary approach to complex societal issues. RMNO-series Preliminary studies and background studies, Preliminary study nr V.16. DeltaHage BV, The Hague, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. and S. Teasley, 1995. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley, C.E., (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 69-97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. and J.R. Griesemer, 1989. Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects; amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum for Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, A., 1998. Participatory research in natural resources. Socioeconomic methodologies. Best practice guidelines. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohng, S., 1995. Participatory Action Research and Community Organizing. Paper presented at The New Social Movement and Community Organizing Conference, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, November 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout, E., M. Hisschemoller and H. Eijsackers, 2007. Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators 7 (2): 215-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Paassen, A., P.F.M. Opdam, E. Steingröer and J. van den Berg, 2011. Landscape science and societal action. In: A. van Paassen, J. van den Berg, R.A. Werkman, E. Steingröer and B. Pedroli (eds.). Knowledge in action: The search for collaborative research for sustainable landscape development. Mansholt Publication Series 11, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 17-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernooy, R. and C. McDougall, 2003. Principles for Good Practice in Participatory Research: Reflecting on Lessons from the Field. In: B. Pound, S. Snapp, C. McDougall and A. Braun (eds.). Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation. Earthscan, London, UK, pp. 113-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, Y., 1998. What is participatory action research? Action Research International, Paper 2. Available at: www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renate Werkman .

Editor information

Annemarie van Paassen Jolanda van den Berg Eveliene Steingröver Renate Werkman Bas Pedroli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Werkman, R., van den Berg, J., van Paassen, A., Harms, B. (2011). What is collaborative landscape research about?. In: van Paassen, A., van den Berg, J., Steingröver, E., Werkman, R., Pedroli, B. (eds) Knowledge in action. Mansholt Publication Series, vol 11. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-724-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics