Feed analyses and digestion methods

  • M. Åkerlind
  • M. Weisbjerg
  • T. Eriksson
  • R. Tøgersen
  • P. Udén
  • BL Ólafsson
  • O. M. Harstad
  • H. Volden
Part of the EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science book series (EAAP, volume 30)

Abstract

Feed characteristics are determined via chemical analyses and digestion methods. SpecificNorFor methods for determining parameters such as DM, sCP, iNDF and the in sacco methods are fully described in this chapter. Tables 5.1 and 5.2 present an overview of the feed analysis and digestion methods, respectively.

Keywords

Feed Sample Silage Sample Digestible Organic Matter Feed Analysis Clover Grass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bach Knudsen, K.E., 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant material used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67: 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach Knudsen, K.E., P. Aman and B.O. Eggum, 1987. Nutritive value of Danish-grown barley varieties. I: Carbohydrates and other major constituents Journal of Cereal Science 6: 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broderick, G.A. and J.H. Kang, 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluidand In vitro Media. Journal of Dairy Science 64: 67–75.Google Scholar
  4. EAAP (European Association of Animal Production), 1969. Methods for determination of digestibility coefficients of feeds for ruminants. Report No. 1 from the Study Commission on Animal Nutrition. Mariendals Boktrykkeri A/S, Gjøvik, Norway.Google Scholar
  5. EC No 152/2009. Commission regulation laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the officialcontrol of feed. OfficialJournal of the European Union L54/1:1-130. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:054:0001:0130:EN:PDF. Accessed 14 October 2009.
  6. Hedqvist, H. and P. Udén, 2006. Measurement of soluble protein degradation in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hvelplund, T., M.R. Weisbjerg and L.S. Andersen, 1992. Estimation of the true digestibility of rumen undegraded protein in the small intestine of ruminants by the mobile bag technique. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 42: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hvelplund, T., M.R. Weisbjerg and K. Søegaard, 1999. Use of in vitro digestibility methods to estimate in vivo digestibility of straws. Tanzania Society of Animal Production Conference, Arusha, Tanzania, 3-6 August. TSAP proceedings 26, pp. 70–78.Google Scholar
  9. ISO 16472:2006 IDT. Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibrecontent (aNDF). Jensen, S.K., C. Jensen, K. Jakobsen, R.M. Engberg, J.O. Andersen, C. Lauridsen, P. Sørensen, P. Henckel, L.H. Skibsted and G. Bertelsen, 1998. Supplementation of broiler diets with retinol acetate, β-carotene or canthaxanthin: Effect on vitamin and oxidative status of broilers in vivo and meat stability. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A - Animal Science 48: 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jensen, S.K., R.M. Engberg and M.S. Hedemann, 1999. All-rac-α-tocopherol acetate is a better vitamin E source than all-rac-α-tocopherol succinate for broilers. Journal of Nutrition 129: 1355–1360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Licitra, G., T.M. Hernandez, P.J. Van Soest, 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 51: 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindgren, E., 1979. Vallfodrets näringsvärde bestämt in vivo och med olika laboratoriemetoder. Rapport 45. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. 66 pp. (In Swedish with English summary).Google Scholar
  13. Lindgren, E., 1983. Nykalibrering av VOS-metoden för bestämning av energivärde hos vallfoder. Working paper. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. 4 pp. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  14. Lindgren, E., 1988. Fodrets energivärde. Course paper Feed Science HNU 3. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. 49 pp. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  15. Madsen, J., T. Hvelplund, M.R. Weisbjerg, J. Bertilsson, I. Olsson, R. Spörndly, O.M. Harstad, H. Volden, M. Tuori, T. Varvikko, P. Huhtanen and B.L. Olafsson, 1995. The AAT/PBV protein evaluation system for ruminants. A revision. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Science, Supplement No. 19. 37 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Michalak, S., M.R. Weisbjerg and T. Hvelplund, 2003. Effect of ration composition fed to cows on the mobile bag digestibility. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 12: 23–32.Google Scholar
  17. Møller, E, P.E. Andersen and N. Witt, 1989. En sammenligning af in vitro opløselighed in vivo fordøjelighed af organisk stof i grovfoder. 13. Beretning fra Fællesudvalget for Statens Planteavls-og Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Danmark. 23 pp. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  18. Nordheim, H., H. Volden, G. Fystro and T. Lunnan, 2007. Prediction of in sacco degradation characteristics of neutral detergent fibre(NDF) in temperate grasses and red clover (Trifolium pratense R.) using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS). Animal Feed Science and Technology 139: 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nozière, P. and B. Michalet-Doreau, 2000. In sacco methods. In: D’Mello J.P.F. (ed.). Farm animal metabolism and nutrition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ørskov, E.R. and I. McDonald, 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from measurements adjusted for rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science 92: 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter, M.G. and R.S. Murray, 2001. The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass and Forage Science 56: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Søegaard, K., M.R. Weisbjerg, R. Thøgersen and M. Mikkelsen, 2001. Laboratoriemetoder til bestemmelse af fordøjlighed i grovfoder til kvæg med særlig vægt på stivelseholdige helsædesgrøder. DJF Rapport nr 34. Husdyrbrug, Danmark 28 pp. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  23. Tilley J.M.A. and R.A. Terry, 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weisbjerg, M.R., P.K. Bhargava, T. Hvelplund and J. Madsen, 1990. Anvendelse af nedbrydningsprofiler fodermiddelvurderingen. Beretning no. 679. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Foulum, Denmark. (In Danish).Google Scholar
  25. Weisbjerg, M.R. and T. Hvelplund, 1993. Bestemmelse af nettoenergiindhold (FEK) i råvarer og kraftfoderblandinger. Forskningsrapport nr. 3. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Denmark. 39 pp. (In Danish).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wageningen Academic Publishers 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Åkerlind
  • M. Weisbjerg
  • T. Eriksson
  • R. Tøgersen
  • P. Udén
  • BL Ólafsson
  • O. M. Harstad
  • H. Volden
    • 1
  1. 1.TINE and the Norwegian University of Life SciencesAkershusNorway

Personalised recommendations