Skip to main content

Transformation and sustainability in agriculture: connecting practice with social theory

  • Chapter
Transformation and sustainability in agriculture

Abstract

This book is about how to analyse the social and institutional mechanisms that enable or hinder endeavours to change the way agriculture is done and food is provided. In recent decades, agriculture and food provision have faced a series of events often labelled as ‘crises’. These have included damage due to increased pressure on natural environments, food scares related to contamination and animal diseases, public fears of genetic modification, and civil protests against the way animals are kept and treated. Since 2001, the Netherlands government has taken upon itself the vast task of initiating a selection of ‘planned’ transitions, in response to these persistent and complex problems and with the aim of achieving a sustainable society within a period of 30 years (Slingerland and Rabbinge, 2009). Sustainable agriculture is one of the selected transition areas, besides energy, mobility, and biodiversity and natural resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Dutch Research Institute for Transition (DRIFT) plays an important role in setting the knowledge agenda for transition thinking in the Netherlands. Terminology used in this volume is partly derived from its work (see http://www.drift.eur.nl/).

References

  • Blanken, H., A. Loeber and D.J. Joustra (2004) Veranderen is leren, leren is veranderen. NIDO Transitiepaper 9, The Hague: Dutch National Initiative for Sustainable Development (NIDO) and Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. and T. Blume (2008) In search of co-variance, causal mechanisms or congruence? Towards a plural understanding of case studies. Swiss Political Science Review 14 (2): 315–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1970) The Research Act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine, Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewulf, A.E., C.J.A.M. Termeer, R.A. Werkman, G.R.P.J. Breeman and K.J. Poppe (2009) Transition management for sustainability: towards a multiple theory approach. In: K.J. Poppe, C. Termeer and M. Slingerland (eds.). Transitions Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. and R. Raven (2006) Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 18 (3/4): 375–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. and J.W. Schot (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2007) The mechanismic worldview: thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 161–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegger, D.L.T., J. Van Vliet and B.J.M. Van Vliet (2007) Niche management and its contribution to regime change: the case of innovation in sanitation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19 (6): 729–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, C.M. and J. Grin (2007) Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9 (3–4): 333–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., D. Loorbach and J. Rotmans (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14 (1): 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D. and J. Rotmans (2006) Managing transitions for sustainable development. In: X. Wieczorek and A.J. Wieczorek (eds.). Understanding Industrial Transformation: views from different disciplines. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sietze Vellema .

Editor information

Sietze Vellema

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vellema, S. (2011). Transformation and sustainability in agriculture: connecting practice with social theory. In: Vellema, S. (eds) Transformation and sustainability in agriculture. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-717-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics