Abstract
Since its founding father Carl Menger published Principle of Economics in 1871, the Austrian school of economics focuses their analysis on areas such as exchange and market process, the structure of production, entrepreneurship, business cycle, monetary theories, economic calculation and central planning 1 The Austrian school of economics does not discuss economics of innovation, though there is a theory of entrepreneurial discovery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Austrian school of economics does not discuss economics of innovation, though there is a theory of entrepreneurial discovery.
- 2.
The term economic development or economic progress is not indexed in Von Mises( Human Action (1949/1963).
- 3.
Menger (1871/1994: 56–67) classifies economic goods into two types, goods of lower order (consumption goods) and goods of higher order (means of production). In production, goods of higher order are to be combined together to produce goods of lower order.
- 4.
In Von Mises’ view (1949/1963), ‘consumer sovereignty’ individuals who purchase goods and services in a free market ‘are at the helm and steer the ship’. ‘Te consumers determine ultimately not only the prices of the consumers’ goods, but no less the prices of all factors of production’. Simply put, the choices of consumers will ultimately determine the choices of producers (Anderson 2001). See also Gunning (2009).
- 5.
Citations from Von Bohm-Bawerk(s works are based on the version posted at ‘Library of Economics and Liberty’ website, http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbPTC.html.
- 6.
Moss (1976: 56–57) summarizes the debate as follows: ‘There is some disagreement in the literature on the degree to which Von Bohm-Bawerk in fact allowed productivity considerations to enter his theory. The issue goes back at least to Frank A. Fetter(s remark in 1902 that it “has been a surprise to many students of Von Bohm-Bawerk to find that he has presented a theory, the most prominent feature of which is the technical productiveness of roundabout processes. His criticism of the productivity theories of interest has been of such a nature as to lead to the belief that he utterly rejected them … [But] it appears from Bohm-Bawerk(s later statement that he does not object to the productivity theory as a partial, but as an exclusive, explanation of interest”. Much later Schumpeter insisted that productivity plays only a subsidiary role in what is in fact wholly a time-preference theory. It is of some interest to note that when Bohm-Bawerk considered the alternative roles for productivity in a time-conscious theory, he came out squarely for an interpretation that placed productivity and “impatience” on the same level. Bohm-Bawerk made it very clear that he was not willing to identify his position with that of Fetter, who espoused a time-preference theory of interest without any mention of productivity considerations. Bohm-Bawerk remarked that “Fetter himself espouses a [theory which] places him on the outer-most wing of the purely ‘psychological’ interest theorists – ‘psychological’ as opposed to ‘technical’. He moves into a position far more extreme than the one I occupy …’”.
- 7.
In this message, Boettke also refers to F.A. Hayek.
- 8.
Kirzner (1979: 162) refers Menger(s argument that ‘men value goods according to the value of the satisfactions that depends on possession of those goods’ to as Menger(s law.
References
Anderson, W.L. (2001) The Economics of Bad Service. The Free Market, vol. 19 (10), October, Mises Institute; http://www.mises.org/freemarketdetail.aspx?Control=377; retrieved on 7 September, 2007.
Boettke, P. (2005) The Role of Private Property in a Free Society. Virginia Viewpoint, April no.2; http://www.virginiainstitute.org/viewpoint/2005042.html, retrieved on 6 September 2007.
Brough, W.T. (2002) Economic Liberty and Government Growth. Freedom Works, February…12;…http://www.freedomworks.org/informed/issues…template.php?issue_id=824, retrieved on 6 September 2007.
Gunning, P. (2009) Consumer Sovereignty: the Key to Mises(s Economics. Working paper, http://it.stlawu.edu/sdae/aelistpapers/consumer%20Sovereignty_%20the%20Key%20to%20Misess%20Economics%20rev.pdf, retrieved on 20 May 2010.
Hayek, F.A. (1949) Individualism and Economic Order. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan.
Hayek, F.A. (1952/1979) The Counter Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis, USA: Liberty Press, pp. 141–152.
Hayek, F.A. (1968) The Defence of Our Civilization Against Intellectual Error. Reprinted in The Freeman, vol. 42 (6/June), 1992, The Foundation for Economic Education.
Hayek, F.A. (1984) The Pretence of Knowledge (Nobel Prize Lecture). In: C. Nishiyama and K. Leube (ed.) The Essence of Hayek. Stanford, USA: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 266–280.
Hayek, F.A. (2002) Competition as Discovery Process. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 5 (3), 9–23.
Holcombe, R. (1998) Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 2 (June), 45–62.
Kirzner, I.M. (1969). Entrepreneurship and the Market Approach to Development. In: I.M. Kirzner Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1979, pp. 107–119.
Kirzner, I.M. (1979) Perception, Opportunity and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I.M. (1985) Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I.M. (ed.) (1994) Classics in Austrian Economics. 3 volumes, London, UK: William Pickering and Chatto Publishers, Ltd.
Lachmann, L.M. (1978) Capital and Its Structure. Kansas City, USA: Sheed Andrews and Mcmeel Inc.
Littlechild, S. (ed.) (1990) Austrian Economics. Vol. III, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
Menger, C. (1871/1994) Principles of Economics. Grove City, USA: Libertarian Press.
Moss, L.S. (ed.) (1976) The Economics of Ludwig von Mises: Toward a Critical Reappraisal. Kansas City, USA: Sheed and Ward, Inc.
Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
O(Driscoll Jr., G.P. and M. Rizzo (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
O(Driscoll Jr., G.P. (1995) The Meaning of Hayek. Cato Policy Report, November/ December; http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/pr-nd-gd.html, retrieved on 7 September, 2007.
Shand, A. (1984) The Capitalist Alternative. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf Books.
Von Bohm-Bawerk, E. (1890) Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory, translated by W.A. Smart. London, UK: Macmillan & Co.; http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbCI1.html, retrieved 4 September 2007.
Von Bohm-Bawerk, E. (1891) The Positive Theory of Capital, translated by W.A. Smart. London, UK: Macmillan & Co.; http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbPTC8.html, retrieved 4 September 2007.
Von Mises, L. (1922/1981) Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis translated by J. Kahane, Foreword by F.A. Hayek. Indianapolis, USA: Liberty Fund.
Von Mises, L. (1949/1963) Human Action, 3rd edition. Chicago, USA: Contemporary Books Inc.
Yu, T.F-L. (1999) Toward a Praxeological Theory of the Firm. Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 12 (1), 25–41.
Yu, T.F-L. (2000) A New Perspective on the Role of the Government in Economic Development: Coordination under Uncertainty. International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 27 (7–10), 994–1013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yu, FL.T. (2011). Economic development in Austrian economics. In: New perspectives on economic development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-716-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-716-5_1
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-716-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)