Skip to main content

Economic development in Austrian economics

  • Chapter
New perspectives on economic development
  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

Since its founding father Carl Menger published Principle of Economics in 1871, the Austrian school of economics focuses their analysis on areas such as exchange and market process, the structure of production, entrepreneurship, business cycle, monetary theories, economic calculation and central planning 1 The Austrian school of economics does not discuss economics of innovation, though there is a theory of entrepreneurial discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Austrian school of economics does not discuss economics of innovation, though there is a theory of entrepreneurial discovery.

  2. 2.

    The term economic development or economic progress is not indexed in Von Mises( Human Action (1949/1963).

  3. 3.

    Menger (1871/1994: 56–67) classifies economic goods into two types, goods of lower order (consumption goods) and goods of higher order (means of production). In production, goods of higher order are to be combined together to produce goods of lower order.

  4. 4.

    In Von Mises’ view (1949/1963), ‘consumer sovereignty’ individuals who purchase goods and services in a free market ‘are at the helm and steer the ship’. ‘Te consumers determine ultimately not only the prices of the consumers’ goods, but no less the prices of all factors of production’. Simply put, the choices of consumers will ultimately determine the choices of producers (Anderson 2001). See also Gunning (2009).

  5. 5.

    Citations from Von Bohm-Bawerk(s works are based on the version posted at ‘Library of Economics and Liberty’ website, http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbPTC.html.

  6. 6.

    Moss (1976: 56–57) summarizes the debate as follows: ‘There is some disagreement in the literature on the degree to which Von Bohm-Bawerk in fact allowed productivity considerations to enter his theory. The issue goes back at least to Frank A. Fetter(s remark in 1902 that it “has been a surprise to many students of Von Bohm-Bawerk to find that he has presented a theory, the most prominent feature of which is the technical productiveness of roundabout processes. His criticism of the productivity theories of interest has been of such a nature as to lead to the belief that he utterly rejected them … [But] it appears from Bohm-Bawerk(s later statement that he does not object to the productivity theory as a partial, but as an exclusive, explanation of interest”. Much later Schumpeter insisted that productivity plays only a subsidiary role in what is in fact wholly a time-preference theory. It is of some interest to note that when Bohm-Bawerk considered the alternative roles for productivity in a time-conscious theory, he came out squarely for an interpretation that placed productivity and “impatience” on the same level. Bohm-Bawerk made it very clear that he was not willing to identify his position with that of Fetter, who espoused a time-preference theory of interest without any mention of productivity considerations. Bohm-Bawerk remarked that “Fetter himself espouses a [theory which] places him on the outer-most wing of the purely ‘psychological’ interest theorists – ‘psychological’ as opposed to ‘technical’. He moves into a position far more extreme than the one I occupy …’”.

  7. 7.

    In this message, Boettke also refers to F.A. Hayek.

  8. 8.

    Kirzner (1979: 162) refers Menger(s argument that ‘men value goods according to the value of the satisfactions that depends on possession of those goods’ to as Menger(s law.

References

  • Anderson, W.L. (2001) The Economics of Bad Service. The Free Market, vol. 19 (10), October, Mises Institute; http://www.mises.org/freemarketdetail.aspx?Control=377; retrieved on 7 September, 2007.

  • Boettke, P. (2005) The Role of Private Property in a Free Society. Virginia Viewpoint, April no.2; http://www.virginiainstitute.org/viewpoint/2005042.html, retrieved on 6 September 2007.

  • Brough, W.T. (2002) Economic Liberty and Government Growth. Freedom Works, February…12;…http://www.freedomworks.org/informed/issues…template.php?issue_id=824, retrieved on 6 September 2007.

  • Gunning, P. (2009) Consumer Sovereignty: the Key to Mises(s Economics. Working paper, http://it.stlawu.edu/sdae/aelistpapers/consumer%20Sovereignty_%20the%20Key%20to%20Misess%20Economics%20rev.pdf, retrieved on 20 May 2010.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1949) Individualism and Economic Order. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1952/1979) The Counter Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis, USA: Liberty Press, pp. 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1968) The Defence of Our Civilization Against Intellectual Error. Reprinted in The Freeman, vol. 42 (6/June), 1992, The Foundation for Economic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1984) The Pretence of Knowledge (Nobel Prize Lecture). In: C. Nishiyama and K. Leube (ed.) The Essence of Hayek. Stanford, USA: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 266–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (2002) Competition as Discovery Process. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 5 (3), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. (1998) Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 2 (June), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1969). Entrepreneurship and the Market Approach to Development. In: I.M. Kirzner Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1979, pp. 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1979) Perception, Opportunity and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1985) Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (ed.) (1994) Classics in Austrian Economics. 3 volumes, London, UK: William Pickering and Chatto Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1978) Capital and Its Structure. Kansas City, USA: Sheed Andrews and Mcmeel Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. (ed.) (1990) Austrian Economics. Vol. III, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1871/1994) Principles of Economics. Grove City, USA: Libertarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L.S. (ed.) (1976) The Economics of Ludwig von Mises: Toward a Critical Reappraisal. Kansas City, USA: Sheed and Ward, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O(Driscoll Jr., G.P. and M. Rizzo (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O(Driscoll Jr., G.P. (1995) The Meaning of Hayek. Cato Policy Report, November/ December; http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/pr-nd-gd.html, retrieved on 7 September, 2007.

  • Shand, A. (1984) The Capitalist Alternative. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bohm-Bawerk, E. (1890) Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory, translated by W.A. Smart. London, UK: Macmillan & Co.; http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbCI1.html, retrieved 4 September 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bohm-Bawerk, E. (1891) The Positive Theory of Capital, translated by W.A. Smart. London, UK: Macmillan & Co.; http://www.econlib.org/library/BohmBawerk/bbPTC8.html, retrieved 4 September 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. (1922/1981) Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis translated by J. Kahane, Foreword by F.A. Hayek. Indianapolis, USA: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. (1949/1963) Human Action, 3rd edition. Chicago, USA: Contemporary Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T.F-L. (1999) Toward a Praxeological Theory of the Firm. Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 12 (1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T.F-L. (2000) A New Perspective on the Role of the Government in Economic Development: Coordination under Uncertainty. International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 27 (7–10), 994–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fu-Lai Tony Yu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yu, FL.T. (2011). Economic development in Austrian economics. In: New perspectives on economic development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-716-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics