Abstract
Faecal output estimates derived from a one-compartment, Gamma-2, age-dependent model were compared with estimates derived algebraically by computing the area under the marker excretion curve for adult sheep and goats given a pulse dose of chromium sesquioxide (Cr2O3). Animals were fed one of three diets (as fed basis): 100% alfalfa hay, 64:36 alfalfa hay: barley grain, and 50:50 alfa1fa hay: concentrate mixture. For the one-compartment model, faecal output was calculated as the dose of chromium sesquioxide divided by the initial concentration in the compartment (milligrams of Cr2O3/gram of DM) multiplied by the age-dependent rate constant (per hours). For the algebraic method, faecal output was calculated as the dose of Cr2O3 divided by the area under the marker excretion curve ([milligrams of %/gram of faecal DM].hours), both with the full complement of faecal samples and with faecal samples collected at 12-h intervals. Faecal output estimated by the three methods did not differ (P<0.48) from measured faecal output (total collection). Marker retention time calculated from the one-compartment, age-dependent model was greater (P<0.05) than retention time calculated algebraically (sum of concentration × time divided by sum of concentrations weighted for collection interval) for animals fed all three diets. No interaction was found for species × diet or species × method of prediction (P<0.05). These results suggest that the area under the marker excretion curve generated from a pulse dose of Cr2O3 will provide estimates of faecal output that do not differ from those calculated from a one-compartment, age-dependent model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Dansky, L.M. and Hill, F.W., 1952. Application of the chromic oxide indicator method to balance studies with growing chickens: Two fgures. Journal of Nutrition 47:449–459.
France, J., Dhanoa, M.S., Siddons, R.C., Thornley, J.M. and Poppi, D.P., 1988. Estimating the production of faeces by ruminants from faecal marker concentration curves. Journal of Theoritical Biology 135:383–391.
Galyean, M.L., 1993. Technical Note: An algebraic method for calculating faecal output from a pulse dose of an external marker. Journal of Animal Sciences 71:3466–3469.
Huston, J.E., Rector, B.S., Ellis, W.C and Allen, M.L., 1986. Dynamics of digestion in cattle, sheep, goats and deer. Journal of Animal Sciences 62:208–215.
Lalles, J.P., Delval, E. and Poncet, D., 1991. Mean retention time of dietary residues within the gastrointestinal tract of the young ruminant: A comparison of noncompartmental (algebraic) and compartmental (modelling) estimation methods. Animal Feed Science and Technololgy 35:139–159.
Le Du, Y.L.P. and Pennining, P.D., 1982. Animal based techniques for estimating herbage intake. In: Leaver, J.D. (ed.). Herbage Intake Handbook, Berks: The British Grassland Society, Hurley, UK, pp.37–75.
Kaske, M. and Von Engelhardt, W., 1990. The effect of size and density on mean retention time of particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63:457–465.
Krysl, L.J., Galyean, M.L., Estell, R.E. and Sowell, B.F., 1988. Estimating digestibility and faecal output in lambs using internal and external markers. Journal of Agricaltural Sciences, (Camb.) 111:19–25.
Krysl, L.J., McCollum, F.T., and Galyean, M.L., 1985. Estimation of faecal output and particulate passage rate with a pulse dose of ytterbium-labeled forage. The Journal of Range Management 38:180–182.
Moore, J.A., Pond, K.R.,. Poore, M.H. and Goodwin, T.G., 1992. Influence of Model and Marker on Digesta Kinetic Estimates for Sheep. Journal of Animal Sciences 70:3528–3540.
Moore, J.A., Fisher, D.S. and Matis, J.H., 1993. Letters to the Editor: Reply to the letter by G.R. Reese. Journal of Animal Sciences 71:1667.
NRC (National Research Council), 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and New World camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Pond, K.R., Ellis, W.C., Matis, J.H., Ferreiro, H.M. and Sutton, J.D., 1988. Compartment models for estimating attributes of digesta flow in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 60:571–595.
SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1 Edition. 2003. SAS Inst., Incorporated Cary, NC, USA.
Zhao L., Chen, Y. and Schaffner, D.W., 2001. Comparison of logistic regression and linear regression in modeling percentage data. Applied Environmental Microbiology 67:2129–2135.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to all the staff from the Section of Research Department in the Shahrekord University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moharrery, A. (2011). Ability of mathematical models to predict faecal output with a pulse dose of an external marker in sheep and goat. In: Sauvant, D., Van Milgen, J., Faverdin, P., Friggens, N. (eds) Modelling nutrient digestion and utilisation in farm animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_22
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-712-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)