Abstract
Growth curve analysis is frequently carried out in the study of growth of farm animals because measurements are taken repeatedly over time on the same individual within groups of animals. Growth functions like the Gompertz, Richards and Lopez, which are based on ordinary differential equations (ODE), can be used to model the functional relationship between size or mass and age. Recently, nonlinear mixed effect models have become very popular in the analysis of growth data because these models quantify both the population mean and its variation in structural parameters. The within animal variability is modelled as being independent and normally distributed and thus assumed to be uncorrelated. Systematic deviations from the individual growth curve can occur, which is the consequence of animal intrinsic variability in response to environmental impacts. This leads to correlated residuals. A way to model correlated residuals is to adopt a stochastic differential equation (SDE) model for the within animal variability. The objective of the present work was to compare two methods for population based growth curve analysis, where the individual growth curve was given as a solution to an ODE or a SDE. Data used to compare the two approaches was based on 40 pigs of three genders where body weight (BW) measurements were conducted weekly until 150 kg BW and then biweekly until slaughter. It was found that the population structural parameter estimates provided by the two methods were similar although the ODE models may underestimate parameter standard errors in the presence of serial correlation. Moreover, variance components may be severely overestimated if serial correlation is not addressed properly. In conclusion, application of SDEs model is biologically meaningful as there are many complex factors that affect growth in pigs and thus deviations from the time trend are mainly driven by the state of the pig.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andersen, S. and Pedersen, B., 1996. Growth and feed intake curves for group-housed gilts and castrated male pigs. Animal Science 63:457–464.
Craig, B.A. and Schinckel, A.P., 2001. Nonlinear mixed effects model for swine growth. Professional Animal Scientist 17:256–260.
Garcia, O., 1983. A stochastic differential equation model for height growth of forest stands. Biometrics 39:1059–1072.
Gompertz, B., 1825. On nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 115:513–585.
Jones R.H., 1993. Longitudinal data with serial correlation: A state space approach. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 240 pp.
Karlsson, M.O., Beal, S.L., and Sheiner, L.B., 1995. Three new error models for population PK/PD analysis, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 23:651–672.
Kebreab, E., Schulin-Zeuthen, M., Lopez, S., Dias, R.S., De Lange, C.F.M. and France, J., 2007. Comparative evaluation of mathematical functions to describe growth and efficiency of phosphorus utilization in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 85:2498–2507.
Klim, S., Mortensen, S.B., Kristensen, N.R., Overgaard, R.V. and Madsen, H., 2009. Population stochastic modelling (PSM) – An R package for mixed-effects models based on stochastic differential equations. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 94:279–289.
Lopez, S., France, J., Gerrits, W.J.J., Dhanoa, M.S., Humphries, D.J., and Dijkstra J., 2000. A generalized Michaelis-Menton equation for the analysis of growth. Journal of Animal Science 78:1816–1828.
Øksendal., B. 1995. Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications. 6th edition. Springer.
Pinheiro, J.C. and Bates, D.M., 1995. Approximations to the Log-likelihood Function in the nonlinear Mixed-effects Model, Journal of Computional and Graphical Statistics 4:12–35.
Pinheiro, J.C. and Bates, D.M., 2000. Mixed effects models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing, Springer, New York, USA, 528 pp.
Richards, F.J., 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany 10:290–300.
Sandland, R. and McGilchrist, C., 1979. Stochastic growth curve analysis. Biometrics 35:255–271.
Strathe, A.B., Danfær, A. and Sørensen, H., 2009. A new mathematical model for combining growth and energy intake in animals: The case of the growing pig. Journal of Theoretical Biology 261:165–175.
Thornley, J.H.M. and France. J., 2007. Mathematical Models in Agriculture. 2nd ed. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.
Tornøe, C.W., Agersø, H., Jonsson, E.N., Madsen, H. and Nielsen, H.A., 2004. Non-linear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in NLME using differential equations, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 76:31–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strathe, A.B., Danfœr, A., Nielsen, B., Klim, S., Sørensen, H. (2011). Population based growth curve analysis: a comparison between models based on ordinary or stochastic differential equations implemented in a nonlinear mixed effect framework. In: Sauvant, D., Van Milgen, J., Faverdin, P., Friggens, N. (eds) Modelling nutrient digestion and utilisation in farm animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_2
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-712-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
