Abstract
Maize production in Swaziland has been falling in recent years, forcing the country to increasingly rely on imports from neighbouring South Africa. Weather patterns that have featured unrelenting droughts in the country, as in the other Southern African countries, have contributed in no small way to this situation. But it is also considered that excessive regulation of the maize market by the statutory body, the National Maize Corporation (NMC) has played a major role. For instance, it has the sole responsibility to anticipate domestic maize demand based on which imports are programmed. In turn, importation of maize can only be done upon receipt of an import license which is not only costly but also involves very cumbersome processes. With the threat of food insecurity growing, suggestions have been made to deregulate the market for maize in order to make the system more efficient possibly by eliminating inefficient production and service units and transferring resources to their best alternative uses. However, to date, no studies have explicitly investigated the likely effects of the current marketing arrangements and how they will differ in a fully deregulated environment. The purpose of this paper is therefore to present the results of a study that examined the welfare effects of regulation in the maize market of Swaziland as a basis for determining the likely impacts of a possible deregulation of the industry, emphasis being placed on the social welfare effects. The study utilized a partial equilibrium model to quantify the distortions in the maize industry. It also drew from the methodological guidance provided by the Comparative Advantage Studies for Southern Africa sponsored by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Te study established that the maize industry of Swaziland is uncompetitive and that this situation gives rise to the serious distortions in the maize market. It was also observed that the system features high degree of efficiency losses as a result of the misallocation of resources in the economy. Prospects for any improvement look quite bleak. The paper concludes by recommending the full deregulation of the maize market and dismantling of the statutory structures that currently manage the system. Implications for effective food chain management are highlighted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aksoy, M.A. and J.C. Beghin. 2005. Global agricultural trade and developing countries. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Bale, M.D. and B.L. Greenshieds, (1978). Japanese agricultural distortions and their welfare value. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59, 59–64.
Bale, M.D. and E. Lutz, (1981). Price distortions in agriculture and their effects: an international comparison. American Journal of agricultural Economics 63, 8–15.
Conway, J.A. and P.S. Tyler (1995). Practical implications of grain market liberalisation in Southern Africa. Publication and Publicity services, Natural Resource Institute, Chatham, UK.
FAO (2009). GIEWS country brief on Swaziland (Global information and early warning system). Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
FAO/WFP (2002). 29th May special report: FAO/WPF crop and food supply assessment mission to Swaziland. FAO/WFP Periodic Publications, Rome, Italy.
FAO/WFP (2003). 9th May special report: FAO/WPF crop and food supply assessment mission to Swaziland: FAO/WFP Periodic Publications, Rome, Italy.
FAO/WFP (2004). 31st July special report: FAO/WPF crop and food supply assessment mission to Swaziland. FAO/WFP Periodic Publications, Rome, Italy.
Freenstra, R.C. (1995). Estimating the effects of trade policy. NBER working papers series 5051. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
IMF (2003). Swaziland: preliminary conclusions of the 2003 article IV consultation mission. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2003/100803.htm.
IRIN (2005). Swaziland: humanitarian crisis worsening. Integrated Regional Information Networks. available at: http://www.notes.relief.int/rwb.nsf.
Jayne, T.S. and G. Argwings-Kodhek (1997). Consumer response to maize market liberalization in urban Kenya. Food Policy 22, 447–458.
Jayne, T.S. and S. Jones (1997). Food marketing and pricing policy in Eastern and Southern Africa: a survey. World Development 4, 1505–1527.
Magagula, G.T. and H.M. Faki (1999). Comparative economic advantage of alternative agricultural production options in Swaziland. United States of Agency for International Development.
Mkhabela, M.S., M.S. Mkhabela and N.N. Mashinini (2005). Early maize yield forecasting in the four agro-ecological regions of Swaziland using NDVI data derived from NOAA’s AVHRR. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 129, 1–9.
Ministry of Finance (2004). Budget Speech 2004. The Swaziland Ministry of Finance, Publications, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Ministry of Finance (2005). Budget Speech 2005. The Swaziland Ministry of Finance, Publications, Mbabane, Swaziland.
MOAC (2004). Ministry of agriculture and cooperatives publications. Available at: http://www.gov.sz.
MOAC-NEWU (2003). National early warning unit for food security. April 2003 Bulletin. MOAC, NEWU Periodic Publications, Mbabane, Swaziland
Monke, E.A. and S.R. Pearson (1989). The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, USA.
NMC Publications (1997). Review of role, function and ownership structure of the Swaziland National Maize Corporation. Vol. II background paper. Oxford policy management paper. Oxford, UK.
Thompson, C.T. (2003). Swaziland business plan yearbook. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Swaziland government publications, Mbabane; Swaziland.
Thompson, C.T. (2004). Swaziland business plan yearbook. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Swaziland government publications, Mbabane; Swaziland.
Tsakok, I. (1990). Agricultural price policy: A practitioner’s guide to partial-equilibrium analysis. Cornel University Press: Ithaca, USA.
Van Schalkyk, H.D., O.T. Van Zyl, P.W. Botha and B. Bayley (1997). Deregulation of Lesotho’s maize industry. Agrekon 36, 626–636.
Varblane, U., K. Toming and R. Selliov (2002). The impact of EU-accession on the Estonia trade with food products – partial equilibrium approach. Tartu University Press: Tartu, Estonia.
World Bank (2005). Swaziland at a glance. The World Bank publications. Available at: http://devdata.worldbank.org/AAG/swz_aag.pdf.
Wright, P.D. and W.L. Nieuwoudt (1993). Price distortions in the South African maize economy: A comparative analysis. Agrekon 32, 51–59.
Acknowledgments
The contributions of Professor Herman van Schalkwyk in the co-supervision of the Masters dissertation from which this chapter is based are gratefully acknowledged by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Obi, A., Mashinini, N.N. (2011). Welfare and incentive efects of possible changes in the regulatory environment of the maize market in Swaziland. In: Obi, A. (eds) Institutional constraints to small farmer development in Southern Africa. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-704-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-704-2_7
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-704-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)