Skip to main content

Determinants of household activity choice, rural income strategies and diversification

  • Chapter
Institutional constraints to small farmer development in Southern Africa

Abstract

South Africa’s post-apartheid economy continues to invest in agricultural development but poverty remains endemic among households with agriculture as their main source of livelihood. There are now doubts that agriculture is the dominant income-generating activity. This chapter analyses the potential livelihoods in rural areas of South Africa. Using household and community level data, the chapter develops simultaneous equations to estimate the determinants of both poverty and income from activities practised in the study area. It is expected that these would enable policymakers to identify the weak links in rural poverty reduction efforts and determine whether agriculture should remain a priority for government investment. Despite low returns per capita, own agriculture and wage employment were shown to be the main sources of income and strongly influenced by level of education, labour availability, social capital, physical capital and geographical location. To improve rural income and reduce poverty, urgent improvements in education, capital resources, infrastructure and communication are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R.H. Jr. (1999). Nonfarm income, inequality and land in rural Egypt. Working paper. World Bank Washington, DC, USA. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/html/dec/Publications/Workpapers/wps2000series/wps2178/wps2178.pdf.

  • Barrett, C.B., T. Reardon,and P. Webb (2001). Nonfarm income diversifcation and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinart, W. and L. Wotshela (1995). Border-Ciskei District study on land reform; land holding, agriculture, land availability and land reform negotiations in Isidenge (Stutterheim) District-Eastern Cape Province. University of Fort Hare, Alice, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D.F. (2002). Multiplex livelihoods in rural Africa: recasting the terms and conditions of gainful employment. Journal of Modern African Studies 40, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., C. De Haan, S.K. Kane, E. Pehu, C. Ragasa and A. Winters-Nelson (2005). agricultural growth for the poor: an agenda for development. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. Jr. (2003). The rural non-farm economy, livelihoods and their diversifcation: Issues and options. Natural Resources Institute. Report No: 2753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. Jr. and D. Pearce, (2001). The non-agricultural rural sector in Central and Eastern Europe. Natural Resources Institute Report No. 2630. Available at: http://www.nri.org/rnfe/pub/papers/2630.pdf.

  • De Janry, A. and E. Sadoulet (2001). Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities. World Development 29, 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S., L. Zhang and X. Zhang (2002). Growth, inequality, and poverty in rural China. Role of public investments. International Food policy Research Institute. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, G., N. Monde, and W. Van Averbeke (2003). Food security on South Africa: a case study of rural livelihoods in the Eastern Cape Province. In: L. Nieuwoudt and J. Groenewald (eds.), The challenge of change: agriculture, land and the South African economy. University of Natal Press: Pietermaritzburg, RSA, pp. 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J.E., J. Greer and E. Thorbecke (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52, 761–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebinck, P. and P.C. Lent (2007). Livelihoods and landscapes: The people of Guquka and Koloni and their resources. Brill: Leiden, the Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S., B. Shiferawi, and J. Pender (2004). Non-farm income, household welfare, and sustainable land management in a less-favoured area in the Ethiopian highlands. Discussion paper. Department of Economics and Resource Management, Agricultural University of Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., C. Barrett and F. Hagos (2006). Food-for-work for poverty reduction and promotion of sustainable land use: can it work? Environment and Development Economics 11, 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katungi, E., C. Machethe, and M. Smale (2007). Determinants of social capital formation in rural Uganda: Implications for group-based agricultural extension approaches. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 1, 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, T., Y. Kijima, and T. Yamano (2006). The role of local nonfarm activities and migration in reducing poverty: evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda. Agricultural Economics 35, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, G.S. (2002). Non-farm economy and rural development. Giri Institute of Development Studies, Lucknow. Available at: http://developmentfrst.org/india/planningcommission/special_study_reports/nonfarm_eco_ruraldev.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nargis, N and M. Hossain (2006). Income dynamics and pathways out of poverty in Bangladesh, 1988–2004. Agricultural Economics 35, 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, M. (2008). Economics. Addison-Wesley, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, S. (2002). Livelihood strategies in rural Transkei (Eastern Cape Province): how does wool production fit in? University of Pretoria, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, V. (2005). The determinants of rural non-farm employment and incomes in Bolivia. Masters of Agricultural Economics Thesis, Michigan State University, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze, S. (2004). Determinants of income generation activities of rural households in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Georg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Rural Development, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics of South Africa (StatsSA) (2001). Household Survey Statistical Release P0317. Available at: http://www.statssa.gov.za/RELEASE/Households/98/P0317.htm.

  • Yúnez-Naude, A. and E. Taylor (2001). The determinants of nonfarm activities and incomes of rural households in Mexico, with emphasis on education. World Development 29, 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, (2006). World Development report 2007: Development and the next generation. Word Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ndhleve, S., Obi, A. (2011). Determinants of household activity choice, rural income strategies and diversification. In: Obi, A. (eds) Institutional constraints to small farmer development in Southern Africa. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-704-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics