Skip to main content
  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

Without a question, it can be concluded that institutions still matter although there is need for restraint to avoid a mindset that institutions are the answer to all the development gaps in developing countries. Nonetheless, the case made for undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the institutional constraints faced by the small farmers in Southern Africa has been justified. The case was made on the grounds that a combination of institutional, climatic and macro-economic constraints seemed to have led to some of the worst food and humanitarian crisis in the region, culminating in drastic food shortages and famines and deepening of poverty levels. It is expected that this will form a basis for recommending alternative approaches to farmer support and other interventions to improve livelihoods and incomes and contribute to poverty alleviation. The collective innovation models that are suited to dealing with the inherent complexities and uncertainties in both the smallholder farming systems of Southern Africa and the policy/development environment are recommended as one way to ensure that increased knowledge about rural conditions as revealed by more robust institutional analysis, translate into practical actions acceptable to all concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2003). Root causes – a historical approach to assessing the role of institutions in economic development. Finance and Development 40, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M., B. Cousins and M. Siyabulela (2000). Land tenure and economic development in rural South Africa: constraints and opportunities. In: B. Cousins (ed.) At the crossroads: land and agrarian reform in South Africa into the 21st Century. Braamfontein, RSA: PLAAS and NLC, pp. 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • African National Congress (1994). The reconstruction and development programme. Pretoria, RSA: the African National Congress (ANC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P.K. (2005). Institutions matter, but which ones? Economics of Transition 13, 499–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, O. and R. McLeman (2009). A recurring anarchy? The emergence of climate change as a threat to international peace and security. Conflict, Security & Development 9, 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulte, E. (2008). Institutions fundamentalism – In-sti-tu-tions. The Broker: connecting worlds of knowledge, http://www.thebrokeronline.eu/en/layout/set/print/articles/In-sti-tu-tions.

  • Bundy, C. (1987). Land and liberation, popular rural protest, and the national liberation movement. In: S. Marks and S. Trepido (eds.) The politics of race, class and nationalism in the twentieth century South Africa. Essex: Longman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, D. and C.J. Van Rooyen (1996). Empowering small farmers through collective action: the case of technology development and transfer. Agrekon 35, 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC/IISD/SAFERWORLD (2009). Climate change and conflict – lessons from community conservancies in northern Kenya. Conservation development centre-international institute for sustainable development-saferworld. Available at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/climate_change_confict_kenya.pdf.

  • Chitsike, C., T. Ngcobo, A. Obi, S. Dube, D. Norris, N. Raidimi, and D. Enserink (2007). Aligning teaching & learning to development challenges: institutionalization of ard in agricultural schools of five South African universities. Paper presented at the ARD Symposium on ‘Enabling collective innovation in agrarian research, development and education – lessons from the last decade’ 28–29 October 2009, Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, J. (2009). Climate change, population pressure and conflict in Africa. ISS Paper 178, Institute for Security Studies, Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, C. (1999). Sources of growth in smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of vertical integration of smallholders with processors and marketers of high-value added items. Agrekon 38 (Special Issue), 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirwayi, T.P. (2010). Application of the sustainable livelihoods framework to the analysis of the provincial growth and development plan of the Eastern Cape Province – A case study of the massive food production programme in Nkonkobe and Buffalo City municipalities. Unpublished MSc Agric Dissertation. University of Fort Hare, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorward, A., J. Kydd, J. Morrison and C. Poulton (2005). Institutions, markets, and economic development: linking development policy to theory and praxis. Development and Change 36, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eicher, C.K. (1999). Institutions and the African farmer. Third Economist Distinguished Lecture. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F. 60 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen-Zucchi, C., G.S. Eskeland, A and Z. Shalizi (2003). Institutions needed for more than growth. Finance and Development 40 (2), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, B. (1998). Struggling to forgive – Nelson Mandela and South Africa’s search for reconciliation. London, UK: HarperCollins Publishers, pp. 173–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Africa (2004). Budget speech to parliament by Mr Trevor Manuel, Minister of Finance. Cape Town, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, K. (1992). The impact of institutional particularities on agricultural policy. In: C. Csaki, T.J. Dams, D. Metzger and J. Van Zyl (eds.) Agricultural restructuring in Southern Africa, IAAE/Agrecona. Windhoek, Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. and V. Ruttan (1985). Agricultural development: an international perspective. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRA (2007). Agro-enterprises and the small farmer. ARD Learning Cycle, International Centre for development-oriented Research in Agriculture, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint United Nations Mission (2010). Southern Africa regional food security update. United Nations Resident Coordinator’s Office, Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jooste, A. and C.J. Van Rooyen (1996). Constraints to small farmer development in the red meat industry. Red Meat Producers Conference, Roodevallei, Pretoria, 27 March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabin, A. (1991). The impact of apartheid on rural areas of South Africa. Antipode 23, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machethe, C.L. (1995). Approaches to rural development in the Third World: lessons for South Africa’, MSc dissertation submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2009). Laureates. Available at: http://nobelprize.org.

  • North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (2009). NATO Chief warns of climate change security risks. News Briefing.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1994). Institutions matter. Economics history working paper 9411004. Economics working paper archive, Washington University, St. Louis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnerships for Sustainable Development (2004). Market access through meeting quality standards for food and agricultural products. Information sheet, Available at: http://webapps01.un.org/dsd/partnerships/public/partnerships/248.html.

  • Rodrik, D. and A. Subramanian (2003). The primacy of institutions – and what this does and does not mean. Finance and Development 40 (2), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? Journal of Economic Literature 44, 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, T. (2003). Markets, trade and the role of institutions in African development. Paper Presented at the Pre-IAAE Conference, 13–14 August, 2003, at the President Hotel, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. (1984). Models of agricultural development. In: C.K. Eicher and J.M. Staatz (eds.) Agricultural development in the Third World. Baltimore, USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D. (2003). Institutions matter, but not for everything. Finance and Development, Volume 40 (2), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebel, A. (2004). Socio-economic complexities of smallholder resource-poor ruminant livestock production systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. PhD Thesis, University of Free State, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (2005). New pathways to sustainability: African universities in search of meaning in a globalizing world. University of Fort Hare Professorial Lecture Series 26 July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2009). COP15 – United Nations conference on climate change. Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2003). Agri-link II Project 2003. Monthly progress report #22, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huylenbroeck, G. and R.L. Espinel (2007). Importance of institutions and governance structures for market access and protection of property rights of small farmers in developing countries. In: E. Bulte and R. Ruben (eds.) Development economics between markets and institutions – incentives for growth, food security and sustainable use of the environment. Wageningen, Wageningen Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2008). Supporting smallholder competitiveness through institutional innovation. In: The World Development Report 2008, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obi, A. (2011). Livelihoods, institutions and the small farmer. In: Obi, A. (eds) Institutional constraints to small farmer development in Southern Africa. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-704-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics