Skip to main content

Fuzzy Semantics in Closed Domain Question Answering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2457 Accesses

Part of the book series: Atlantis Computational Intelligence Systems ((ATLANTISCIS,volume 7))

Abstract

In this chapter we describe fuzzy semantics in a disaster question answering domain. Emergency management implies to go from reports or descriptions of the disaster into rescue work. These descriptions are usually expressed linguistically by witnesses and must be transformed into comprehensible data. The aim of our approach is to achieve a multiple interest: modeling data through (un)balanced fuzzy 2-tuples should permit to decrease the CPU time while keeping an adequate approximation. Another interest lies in the recourse to the natural language processing (NLP) that should offer a multi-lingual interface to non-expert users. Thanks to our method, these users will be helped to express their diagnosis (of the disaster consequences) which will be translated into a dataset representing the catastrophic event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abchir, M. (2011). A jFuzzyLogic Extension to Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets, Book of Abstracts, pp. 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abchir, M. and Truck, I. (2011). Towards a New Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Modeling Approach for Geolocation Applications, in Proc. of the EUROFUSE Workshop on Fuzzy Methods for Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanchard, W. (2008). Guide to emergency management and related terms, definitions, concepts, acronyms, organizations, programsn guidance, executive orders & legislation, http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/docs/terms\%20and\%20definitions/Terms\%20and\%20\\Definitions.pdf .

  4. Châtel, P., Truck, I. and Malenfant, J. (2010). LCP-Nets: A Linguistic Approach for Nonfunctional Preferences in a Semantic SOA Environment, J. UCS 16, 1, pp. 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language, its nature, origin, and use, (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuny, F. (1983). Disasters and development (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Espinilla, M., Ruan, D., Liu, J. and Martínez, L. (2010). A heterogeneous evaluation model for assessing sustainable energy: A Belgian case study, in FUZZ-IEEE, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, B. and Rubin, G. (1971). Automated Grammatical Tagging of English, Tech. rep., Department of Linguistics, Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, Knowledge Acquisition 5, 2, pp. 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, Z. S. (1991). A theory of language and information : a mathematical approach/Zellig Harris (Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, Oxford [England]: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera, F., Herrera-viedma, E. and Martínez, L. (2008). A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 354–370.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera, F. and Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8, 6, pp. 746–752.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herrera, F. and Martínez, L. (2001). A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 31, 2, pp. 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hillson, D. A. (2005). Describing probability : The limitations of natural language dimensions of risk, Risk Management, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Durand, J.-M. T. (2006). Pfc, corpus et systèmes de transcription, Cahiers de Grammaire 30, pp. 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelman, I. (2008). Disaster lexicon. version 7, 19 may 2008 (version 1 was 10 january 2007), http://www.ilankelman.org/miscellany/DisasterLexicon.rtf.

  17. Kuhn, R. andMori, R. D. (1990). A cache-based natural language model for speech recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 6, pp. 570–583.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Makki, J., Alquier, A. and Prince, V. (2009). Ontology Population via NLP techniques in Risk Management, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 3, 3, pp. 210–217.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martínez, L., Ruan, D. and Herrera, F. (2010). Computing with words in decision support systems: An overview on models and applications, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3, 4, pp. 382–395.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rieger, B. B. (1979). Fuzzy structural semantics. on a generative model of vague natural language meaning, in Trappl/Hanika/Pichler (Eds.): Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vol. V, New York/London/Sydney, pp. 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez, J. T., Vitoriano, B. and Montero, J. (2010). A natural-disaster management DSS for Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organisations, Knowledge-Based Systems 23, 1, pp. 17–22, special Issue on Intelligent Decision Support and Warning Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tulechki, N. (2011). Des outils de TAL en support aux experts de sûreté industrielle pourl’ exploitation de bases de données de retour d’expérience, in TALN, 12 p.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). Eliza — a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine, Communications of the ACM 9, 1, pp. 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Winograd, T. (1972). Procedures as a representation for data in a computer program for understanding natural language, Cognitive Psychology 3, 1, pp. 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information Control 8, pp. 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zou, L., Ruan, D., Pei, Z. and Xu, Y. (2011). A Linguistic-Valued Lattice Implication Algebra Approach for Risk Analysis, Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 17, 4, pp. 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is partially funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR) under grant number ANR-09-SEGI-012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Atlantis Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abchir, MA., Truck, I., Pappa, A. (2013). Fuzzy Semantics in Closed Domain Question Answering. In: Vitoriano, B., Montero, J., Ruan, D. (eds) Decision Aid Models for Disaster Management and Emergencies. Atlantis Computational Intelligence Systems, vol 7. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-74-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-74-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-91216-73-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-91216-74-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships