Abstract
The automatic detection of complex human activities in daily life using distributed ambient and on-body sensors is still an open research challenge. A key issue is to construct scalable systems that can capture the large diversity and variety of human activities. Dynamic system reconfiguration is a possible solution to adaptively focus on the current scene and thus reduce recognition complexity. In this work, we evaluate potential energy savings and performance gains of dynamic reconfiguration in a case study using 28 sensors recording 78 activities performed within four settings. Our results show that reconfiguration improves recognition performance by up to 11.48 %, while reducing energy consumption when turning off unneeded sensors by 74.8 %. The granularity of reconfiguration trades off recognition performance for energy savings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Geer, Will gesture recognition technology point the way?, Computer, 37(10), 20–23 (Oct., 2004).
D. J. Cook and S. K. Das, How smart are our environments? an updated look at the state of the art, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 3(2), 53–73, (2007)
D. J. Cook, J. C. Augusto, and V. R. Jakkula, Ambient intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(4), 277–298, (2009)
G. Pottie andW. Kaiser,Wireless integrated network sensors, Communications of the ACM, 43, 51–58, (2000).
M. Ryoo and J. Aggarwal, Recognition of composite human activities through context-free grammar based representation, In Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), vol. 2, pp. 1709–1718, (2006)
D. Kawanaka, T. Okatani, and K. Deguchi, HHMM based recognition of human activity, IEICE Trans. Information Systems, E89-D(7), 2180–2185 (July, 2006).
F. Naya, R. Ohmura, F. Takayanagi, H. Noma, and K. Kogure, Workers’ routine activity recognition using body movements and location information, In Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Wearable Computers (ISWC), pp. 105–108, (2006)
G. Ogris, T. Stiefmeier, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster, Using a complex multi-modal on-body sensor system for activity spotting, In Proc. Int. Symp. Wearable Computers (ISWC), pp. 55–62, (2008)
K. Murao, T. Terada, Y. Takegawa, and S. Nishio, A context-aware system that changes sensor combinations considering energy consumption, In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Pervasive Computing (Pervasive), pp. 197–212, (2008).
K.-F. Lee, Context-dependent phonetic hidden markov models for speaker-independent continuous speech recognition, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 38(4), 599–609, (1990)
M. Stäger, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster, Power and accuracy trade-offs in sound-based context recognition systems, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 3(3), 300–327 (June, 2007).
H. Ghasemzadeh, E. Guenterberg, and R. Jafari, Energy-efficient information-driven coverage for physical movement monitoring in body sensor networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 27(1), (2009).
P. Zappi, C. Lombriser, T. Stiefmeier, E. Farella, D. Roggen, L. Benini, and G. Tröster, Activity recognition from on-body sensors: Accuracy-power trade-off by dynamic sensor selection, In Proc. Europ. Conf. Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN), pp. 17–33, (2008).
G. Batori, Z. Theisz, and D. Asztalos, Domain specific modeling methodology for reconfigurable networked systems, In Proc. Int. Conf. Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS), pp. 316–330, (2007)
C. Lombriser, M. Rossi, A. Breitenmoser, D. Roggen, and G. Tröster, Recognizing context for pervasive applications with the titan framework, Technical report, Wearable Computing Laboratory, ETH Zurich, (2009)
R. Gravina, A. G. an Giancarlo Fortino, F. Bellifemine, R. Giannantonio, and M. Sgroi, Development of body sensor network applications using SPINE, In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), (2008)
V. Osmani, S. Balasubramaniam, and D. Botvich, Human activity recognition in pervasive health-care: Supporting efficient remote collaboration, Network and Computer Applications, 31(4), 628–655, (2008)
E. Kim, S. Helal, and D. Cook, Human activity recognition and pattern discovery, Pervasive Computing Magazine, 9(1), 48–53, (2010)
O. Amft, C. Lombriser, T. Stiefmeier, and G. Tröster, Recognition of user activity sequences using distributed event detection, In Proc. Europ. Conf. Smart Sensing and Context (EuroSSC), pp. 126–141, (2007).
W. Dargie and T. Tersch, Recognition of complex settings by aggregating atomic scenes, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(5), 58–65, (2008).
O. Amft and G. Tröster, Recognition of dietary activity events using on-body sensors, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 42(2), 121–136, (2008)
H. Junker, O. Amft, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster, Gesture spotting with body-worn inertial sensors to detect user activities, Pattern Recognition, 41(6), 2010–2024 (June, 2008).
Q. Xu, M. Kamel, and M. M. A. Salama, Significance test for feature subset selection on image recognition, In Proc. Int. Conf. Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR), pp. 244–252, (2004)
L. I. Kuncheva, Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms, (Wiley Interscience, 2005).
P. Zappi, C. Lombriser, E. Farella, L. Benini, and G. Tröster, Experiences with experiments in ambient intelligence environments, In Proc. IADIS Int. Conf. Wireless Applications and Computing, pp. 171–174 (June, 2009).
O. Amft, Adaptive activity spotting based on event rates, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing (SUTC), pp. 169–176, (2010). doi: 10.1109/SUTC.2010.63.
B. Bougard, F. Catthoor, D. C. Daly, A. Chandrakasan, and W. Dehaene, Energy efficiency of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard in dense wireless microsensor networks: Modeling and improvement perspectives, In Proc. Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE), pp. 196–201, (2005)
J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and D. Culler, Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research, In Proc. Int. Symp. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), p. 48, (2005).
D. Surie, F. Lagriffoul, T. Pederson, and D. Sjölie, Activity recognition based on intra and extra manipulation of everyday objects, In Proc. Int. Symp. Ubiquitous Computing Systems (UCS), pp. 196–210, (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Atlantis Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lombriser, C., Amft, O., Zappi, P., Benini, L., Tröster, G. (2011). Benefits of Dynamically Reconfigurable Activity Recognition in Distributed Sensing Environments. In: Chen, L., Nugent, C., Biswas, J., Hoey, J. (eds) Activity Recognition in Pervasive Intelligent Environments. Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence, vol 4. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-05-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-05-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Atlantis Press
Print ISBN: 978-90-78677-42-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-91216-05-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)