Abstract
In recent years, diagnostic and prognostic methods of cancer have become one of the research focuses in clinical medicine with the increased risk of cancer. However, how to excavate the more information from the data, how to establish the different math model, and how to verify the diagnosis further are of great significance for doctor to improve the diagnostic accuracy and reduce the diagnostic complexity. This paper collects and teases the gallbladder cancer data from the first affiliated hospital of medical college of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, which is used to be excavated except the known tumor markers. Then, the optimal data model is set up using some typical Bayesian networks. Finally, we improve the warning factors of tumor diagnosis from the known information by putting importance calculation method into the analysis of gallbladder diagnosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. Misra, A. Chaturvedi, N. C. Misra, I. D. Sharma, “Carcinoma of the gallbladder,” The lancet oncology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp.167–176, 2003
R. Kanthan, J. L. Senger, S. Ahmed, S. C. Kanthan, “Gallbladder cancer in the 21st century,” Journal of oncology, vol. 2015, 2015.
B. Efron, “Bayesian,frequentist and scientist,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 100, no. 469, pp. 1–5, 2005.
Mr. Bayes, M. Price, “An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. by the late rev. mr. bayes, frs communicated by mr. price, in a letter to john canton, amfrs,” Philosophical Transactions (1683-1775), vol. 53, pp. 370–418, 1763.
A. Racinc, G. P. Grieve,H. Fluhler, A. F. M. Smith, “Bayesian methods in practice:experiences in the pharmaceutical industry(with Discussion),” Applied Statistics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 93–150, 1986.
S. B. Si, G.M. Liu, Z. Q. Cai, P. Xia, “Using Bayesian networks to built a diagnosis and prognosis model for breast cancer” Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), 2011 IEEE 18Th International Conference on. pp. 1795–1799, 2011.
Y. Ko, C. X. Zhai, S. Rodriguez-Zas, “Inference of gene pathways using mixture Bayesian networks.” BMC systems biology, vol. 3, no. 12, pp: 1–16, 2009.
N. A. Loghmanpour, M. K. Kanwar, M. J. Druzdzel, R. L. Benza, S. Murali, J. F. Antaki, “A new Bayesian network-based risk stratification model for prediction of short-term and long-term LVAD mortality”. ASAIO Journal, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 313–323, 2015.
N. Friedman, D. Geiger, M. Goldszmidt, “Bayesian network classifiers,” Machine Learning, vol. 29, pp. 131–163, 1997.
S. B. Kim, K. S. Han, H. C. Rim, S. H. Myaeng, “Some effective techniques for naive bayes text classification,” Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1457–1466, 2006.
R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, “Subjective Bayesian methods for rule-based inference systems,” Proceedings of the June 7–10, 1976, national computer conference and exposition. ACM, pp. 1075–1082, 1976.
F. Pernkopf, J Bilmes, “Discriminative versus generative parameter and structure learning of Bayesian network classifiers,” Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning. ACM, pp. 657–664, 2005.
J. E. Ramirez-Marquez, D. W. Coit, “Composite importance measures for multi-state systems with multi-state components,” Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 517–529, 2005.
S. F. Song, Z. Z. Lu, W. Li, L. J. Cui, “The uncertainty importance measures of the structural system in view of mixed uncertain variables,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 243, pp. 25–35, 2014.
S. B. Si, L. Yang, Z. Q. Cai, “A New and Efficient Computation Method of IM(Integrated Importance Measures) for Components in Binary Coherent Systems,” journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 939–947, 2011.
S. Conrady, L. Jouffe, “Bayesian Networks and BayesiaLab: A Practical Introduction for Researchers,” Bayesia USA, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Atlantis Press and the author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
CAI, Zq., GUO, P., LI, S., CONG, Ll., GENG, Zm. (2017). Gallbladder Diagnosis and Importance Analysis based on Bayesian Network. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2016. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-255-7_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-255-7_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-94-6239-254-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-6239-255-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)