Skip to main content

Abstract

The drug abusers tend to make impulsive choice, impatiently choosing a smaller-immediate reward rather than a larger-late reward. The present study compared the impulsive choice and trait impulsivity of three groups of individuals and investigated their relationship. The groups were heroin abusers, methamphetamine abusers and non-drug-using controls. Analysis demonstrated that drug abusing individuals made more impulsive choices or discounted delayed rewards more steeply than individuals with no history of drug use. And these differences did not depend on drug type. Furthermore, no significant correlation found between impulsive choice and trait impulsivity, as well as impulsive choice and drug use variables in drug groups. Overall, this study extended the understanding of behavior process in drug abusers; however, the results need to be verified in future researches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. H. Rachlin, A. Raineri, and D. Cross, “Subjective probability and delay,” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 233-244, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. K. Bickel, and L. A. Marsch, “Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes”, Addiction, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 73-86, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Reynolds, “A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling”, Behavioural Pharmacology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 651-667, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. E. Mazur, An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987, pp. 55-73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. K. Bickel, A. L. Odum, and G. J. Madden, “Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers”, Psychopharmacology, vo l. 146, no .4, pp. 447-454, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. F. Coffey, G. D. Gudleski, M. E. Saladin, and K. T. Brady, “Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals”, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 11, no.1, pp. 18, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. N. Kirby, N. M. Petry, and W. K. Bickel, “Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 128, pp. 78–87, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Bobova, P. R. Finn, M. E. Ricket, and J. Lucas, “Disinhibitory psychopathology and delay discounting in alcohol dependence: personality and cognitive correlates”, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 17, pp. 51–61, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. M. Petry, “Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls”, Psychopharmacology, vol. 154, pp. 243–250, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. E. Vuchinich, and C. A. Simpson, “Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers”, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 6, pp. 292–305, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. J. Madden, W. K. Bickel, and E. A. Jacobs, “Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions”, Journal of Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology,vol. 7, pp. 284–293, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Heil, M. Johnson, S. Higgins, and W. Bickel, “Delay discounting in currently using and currently abstinent cocaine-dependent outpatients and non-drug-using matched controls”, Addictive Behaviors, vol. 31, pp. 1290–1294, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. F. Hoffman, M. Moore, R. Templin, B. McFarlan, R. J. Hitzemann, and S. H. Mitchell, “Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals”, Psychopharmacology, vol. 188, pp. 162–170, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. F. Hoffman, D. L. Schwartz, M. S. Huckans, B. H. McFarland, G. Meiri, A. A. Stevens, and S. H. Mitchell, “Cortical activation during delay discounting in abstinent methamphetamine dependent individuals”, Psychopharmacology, vol. 201, pp. 183–193. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. Monterosso, G. Ainslie, J. Xu, X. Cordova, C. P. Domier, and E. D. London, “Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetamine-dependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task”, Human Brain Mapping ,vol. 28, pp. 383–393, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Ainslie, and V. Haendel, The motives of the will. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1983, pp. 140–199.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. L. Bretteville-Jensen, “Addiction and discounting”, Journal of Health Economics, vol. 18, pp. 393–407, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. M. Petry, and T. Casarella, “Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems”, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 56, pp. 25–32, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. W. Johnson, W. K. Bickel, F. Baker, B. A. Moore, G. J. Badger, and A. J. Budney, “Delay discounting in current and former marijuana-dependent individuals”, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 18, pp. 99–107, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. N. Kirby, and N. M. Petry, “Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls”, Addiction, vol. 99, pp. 461–471, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Badiani, D. Belin, , D. Epstein, D. Calu, and Y. Shaham, “Opiate versus psychostimulant addiction: The differences do matter”, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 12, pp. 685–700, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. A. Wise, “Catecholamine theories of reward: A critical review”, Brain Research, vol.152, pp. 215-247, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. H. Patton, M. S. Stanford, and E. S. Barratt, “Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 51, pp. 768–774, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xian-yun Li,M. R. Philips ,Dong Xu,Ya-li Zhang,Shao-jie Yang,Yong-sheng Tong, et al., “Reliability and validity of an adapted Chinese version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale” (in Chinese), Chinese Mental Health Journal, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 610-615, Jan. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Reynolds,A. Ortengren ,J.B. Richards ,and H. de Wit, “Dimensions of impulsive behaviour: personality and behavioural measures”, Personality and Individual Differences,vol.40, pp. 305–315, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Kong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Atlantis Press and the author(s)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kong, Y., Zhang, Jx. (2016). An Evaluation of Impulsive Choice and Trait Impulsivity in Drug Abusers. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-180-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-180-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6239-179-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6239-180-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics