Abstract
One of the fastest growing areas in clinical laboratory testing is molecular diagnostics. This growth has been in part the result of the tremendous amount of knowledge gained in the last decade from the Human Genome Project regarding organization, regulation, and expression of genomic information in humans and microbes. This knowledge has allowed us to better understand the pathogenesis of many diseases at the molecular level. As a consequence, diseases are being increasingly defined in terms of their molecular pathogenesis. This has lead to the development of new clinical molecular assays for diagnosis, prognosis, selection of therapeutic modalities, and monitoring of diseases. Until a few years ago, practical laboratory methods for detecting differences in nucleic acid sequences were not sufficiently simple or robust for the clinical laboratory. Recent advances in new technology, instrumentation, and efforts in standardization have overcome many of these limitations. The development and introduction of new technologies that allow automation of the testing process, as well as higher-throughput testing, have improved the diagnosis of diseases and patient care. In addition to the increasing number of kits and reagents used for molecular diagnostics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a large number of molecular tests are still manufactured in-house by different clinical laboratories. In its role supporting US science and industry, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a nonregulatory agency of the US Department of Commerce, provides physical and chemical standards in support of national commerce, manufacturing, and science (3). These materials are available internationally as Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) for use by industry developing assays and/or technology platforms for diagnostic use, by regulatory agencies ensuring the quality and efficacy of these assays, and by clinical laboratories providing diagnostic tests for patients. Traditionally, NIST responds to standard needs as defined by these communities. Consensus is developed through NIST workshops attended by representatives of these communities as well as direct request by other governmental agencies. Specific examples of ongoing programs within the Biotechnology Division at NIST are described in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Association for Molecular Pathology statement. Recommendations for in–house development and operation of molecular diagnostic tests. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 111(4):449–463,1999.
Carter, M. A. Ethical aspects of genetic testing. Biol. Res. Nurs. 3(1): 24–32, 2001.
Dequeker, E., Ramsden, S., Grody, W. W., Stenzel, T. T., and Barton, D. E. Quality control in molecular genetic testing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2(9):717–723, 2001.
Ferreira–Gonzalez, A., Wilkinson, D. S., and Garrett, C. T. Establishing a molecular diagnostics laboratory, in Management Clinical Laboratory Methods in 20th ed. John B Henry (ed.).
Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act. Public Law 105–115, 111 Statute 2296, 1997.
Kaul, K., Leonard, D. G. B., Gonzalez, A., and Garrett, C. T. Oversight of genetic testing: an update. J. Mol. Diagn. 3(3):85–91, 2001.
McGovern, M. M., Benach, M. O., Wallenstein, S., Desnick, R. J., and Keenlyside, R. Quality assurance in molecular genetic testing laboratories. JAMA 281(9):835–840, 1999.
Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Public Law 94–295, 90 Statute 539, 1976.
Medical Devices: classification/reclassification; restricted devices; analyte specific reagents. Fed. Reg. 62:62,243–62,260, 1997.
MM3—A Molecular Diagnostics method for infectious diseases; Approved guidelines, 1995.
Mulcahy, G. M. The integration of molecular diagnostic methods into the clinical laboratory. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 29(1):43–54, 1999.
Niesters, H. G. Quantitation of viral load using real-time amplification techniques. Methods 25(4):419–429, 2001.
Niesters, H. G. Clinical virology in real time. J. Clin. Virol. 25 (Suppl. 3):3–12, 2002.
Neumaier, M., Braun, A., and Wagener, C. Fundamentals of quality assessment of molecular amplification methods in clinical diagnostics. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Scientific Division Committee on Molecular Biology Techniques. Clin. Chem. 44(1):12–26, 1998.
Prence, E. M. A practical guide for the validation of genetic tests. Genet. Test. 3(2):201–205, 1999.
Safe Medical Device Act of 1990. Public Law 101–629, 104 Statute 4523, 1990.
Schwartz, M. K. Genetic testing and the clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988: present and future. Clin. Chem. 45(5):739–745, 1999.
Swanson, P. E. Labels, disclaimers, and rules (Oh my!). Analyte-specific reagents and practice of immunohistochemistry. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 111:445–448, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferreira-Gonzalez, A., Garrett, C.T. (2006). Laboratory-Developed Tests in Molecular Diagnostics. In: Coleman, W.B., Tsongalis, G.J. (eds) Molecular Diagnostics. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-928-1:247
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-928-1:247
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-356-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-928-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)