Biomechanical Analysis of Slip, Trip, and Fall Accidents
Traumatic injuries and deaths resulting from slip, trip, and fall accidents are a significant public health problem in the United States. The economic loss due to lost employment time is an important factor in many industrial settings and the likelihood of injuries resulting from slip, trip, and fall accidents is an increasing concern in general, particularly as the population ages. It is reported that in the year 2000, there were approx 8.1 million visits to emergency rooms as a result of accidental falls, which constitutes approx 20% of the total number of reported emergency room visits in that year (1). Amongst the elderly living in the general population, it is reported that approx 30% of those over the age of 65 fall each year, and for those over 80 yr old, the rate is approx 40% (2). Others estimate that on average more than 16,000 people die each year as a result of fall related injuries (3). Injuries resulting from slip, trip, and fall accidents are not limited to a single region of the body and include injuries to the foot, ankle, knee, hip, and head. As a result of this epidemic in slip, trip, and fall-related injuries, numerous measures have been undertaken in an attempt to reduce the number of slip-and-fall accidents including, but not limited to, the use of slip-resistant materials on walkway surfaces and prescribed shoe outsole materials and patterns.
KeywordsSine Nism Shoe
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Injury Facts, 2002 Edition, National Safety Council.Google Scholar
- 2.Englander F, Hodson TJ, Terrerossa RA. Economic dimensions of slip and fall injuries. J Foren Sci 41: 733–746 (1996).Google Scholar
- 3.Di Pilla S, Vidal K. State of the Art in Slip-Resistance Measurement Areview of current standards and continuing developments, Professional Safety, June 2002.Google Scholar
- 4.Sacher A. Slip resistance and the James Machine 0.5 static coefficient of friction: sine qua non. ASTM Standardization News, August:52–59 (1993).Google Scholar
- 5.Ekkebus CF, Killey W. Measurement of safe walkway surfaces. Soap-Cosmetics-Chemical Specialties, February, 1973.Google Scholar
- 6.Marpet MI. On threshold values that separate pedestrian walkways that are slip resistant from those that are not. J Forensic Sci 41:747–755 (1996).Google Scholar
- 8.Batterman SD, Batterman SC, Medoff HP. Mechanics of Macroslip: A new phenomenological theory. In: McCabe PT, ed. Contemporary ergonomics. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- 9.Medoff H, Fleisher DH, Di Pilla S. Comparison of slip resistance measurements between two tribometers using smooth and grooved neolite-test-liner-test feet: metrology of pedestrian locomotion and slip resistance: ASTM STP 1424. In: Marpet MI, Sapienza MA, eds. West Conshohocken, Pa: ASTM International, 2002.Google Scholar
- 10.McMahon TA. Muscles, reflexes, and locomotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- 11.Saunders JB, Inman VT, Eberhart HD, The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. J Bone Joint Surg 35A:543–558 (1953).Google Scholar