Abstract
Rather disingenuously, Alex Callinicos once remarked that his only excuse for producing another work on postmodernism was a sense of personal satisfaction gained from alleviating, however temporally, the irritation he felt when confronted by the hubris and obsfucation of certain postmodern texts. More earnestly, but along the same lines, Christopher Norris introduced The Truth about Postmodernism, noting that large sections of the erstwhile left or left-liberal intelligentsia had been won over to consensus-based doctrines of meaning and truth that left them unable to articulate any kind of reasoned or principled opposition. Although the melancholic period of Thatcherism, the context for the above works, has since been superseded by Tony Blair’s new times, and Anthony Giddens’ third way, their language of change and modernisation might be considered to be a sanitised version of the familiar obfuscating pragmatism. As a prolegomena towards a critique of the discourse of globalisation, social exclusion and identity politics, this present work is a commentary on such obfuscation, the process of concealment common both to ‘modernisers’ and postmodernists. It is in effect a commentary on ideology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Sokal and J. Bricmont, Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosopher’s Abuse of Science (Profile Books: London, 1998).
J. Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. F. Lawrence 1st pub. 1985 (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987), p. 94.
A. Schrift, ‘Between Church and State: Nietzche, Deleuze and the Genealogy of Psychoanalysis’, International Studies in Philosophy, vol. 24 (1992) 41.
T. May, ‘The system and its Fractures: Gilles Deleuze on Otherness’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 24, 1 (Jan 1993), 3.
J. Fleiger, ‘Becoming-Woman: Deleuze, Schreber and Molecular Identification,’ in I. Buchanan and C. Colebrook eds, Deleuze and Feminist Theory (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000) pp. 38–63.
See J. Lechte, Fifty Contemporary Thinkers: from Stucturalism to Postmodernity (London and New York: Routledge, 1994).
Biography; see J. Miller, The Passions of Michel Foucault, (London: Flamingo, 1994).
L. Ferry, L. and A. Renaut, French Philosophy of the Sixties: an Essay on Antihumanism, trans. M. Schackenberg 1st pub. 1985 (University of Massachusetts Press: Amherst, 1990).
Compare and contrast Deleuze and Heidegger on Nietzsche. M. Heidegger, Nietzsche trans. D. Krell (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981) vol. 1 and (San Francisco: Harper Row, 1984), vol. 2.
J. Marks, Gilles Deleuze: Vitalism and Multiplicity (London and Virginia: Pluto Press, 1998), p. 56.
R. Bernstein, the New Constellation: The Ethical and Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991), p. 4.
R. Rorty, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 79–80.
For a discussion on Deleuze’s attitude to systems, see T. Clark, ‘Deleuze and Structuralism: Towards a Geometry of Sufficient Reason’, in K.A. Pearson ed., Deleuze and Philosophy: the Difference Engineer (London and New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 58–72 and
R. Bogue, ‘Gilles Deleuze: the Aesthetics of Force’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 24, 1 (Jan 1993), 56.
M. Hardt, Gilles Deleuze: an Apprenticeship in Philosophy (London: UCL Press, 1993), p. 57.
‘By singularity, we mean not only something that opposes the universal, but also something that can be extended close to another, so as to obtain a connection; it is singularity in the mathematical sense’. Cadava, Connor, Nancy eds, Who comes after the Subject? (Routledge: New York, 1991), p. 94. See also Difference and Repetition and The Fold. For a discussion of his identification of the mathematical, material and metaphysical, see A. Badiou, ‘The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque’, in C. Boundas and D. Olkowski (eds), Gilles Deleuze and the Theatre of Philosophy (New York and London: Routledge, 1994), p. 53.
‘The early stages of this “revolution in rigour” (led) to an examination of the concept of natural number’. D. Gillies, Frege, Dedekind and Peano on the Foundations of Arithmetic (The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1982), p. 9.
‘It transpires that what he (Ryle) means by “the massive developments of our logical theory” is the progression from Russell’s theory of descriptions to Wittgenstein’s theories of meaning. These developments he characterises as “The Cambridge transformation of the Theory of Concepts” thus bypassing the slightly awkward fact that Wittgenstein was more Germanic than Anglo-Saxon. Wittgenstein, for all he wrote in German and felt like an alien in England was, it seems, a Cambridge man though and through, and not really a Continental at all’. Monk, 1996, p. 3 quoted in S. Glendenning, Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999), p. 9.
S. Mitchell, ‘Post-structuralism, Empiricism and Interpretation’, in S. Mitchell and M. Rosen eds, The Need for Interpretation: Contemporary Conceptions of the Philosopher’s Task (London: Athlone Press, 1993), p. 55.
R. Jacoby, ‘The Politics of Subjectivity’, New Left Review, 79 (May 1973), 41.
S.R.L. Clark, ‘Have Biologists wrapped up Philosophy?’ Inquiry, 2000, 43, 148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Gillian Howie
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howie, G. (2002). Introduction. In: Deleuze and Spinoza. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990204_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990204_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39462-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-9020-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)