Abstract
In the current policy context, in Britain and elsewhere, there has been increasing emphasis on community involvement and empowerment within the framework of strategies for more inclusive development/ regeneration within the mixed economy of welfare. This chapter explores the contested concept of empowerment in the current policy context, before focusing on illustrations of more (and sometimes less effectively) empowering experiences in practice. Whilst there are encouraging examples of experiences which have been recognised as empowering and inclusive by those involved themselves, countertendencies are also identified. As some groups are becoming more empowered others are being left out, and these increasingly marginalised groups are disproportionately likely to be those already disadvantaged in terms of ‘race’, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, age, disability, housing tenure and social class. There are implications for policies and practices at local, national and international levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anastacio, J. et al. (2000). Reflecting Realities: Participants’ Perspectives on Integrated Communities and Sustainable Regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press.
Back, L. et al. (2000). A Voice for Young People: An Evaluation of the Lewisham Youth Participation Project Occasional Paper, Centre for Urban and Community Research, Goldsmiths College, University of London.
Beresford, P. and M. Turner (1997). It’s Our Welfare. London: National Institute of Social Work.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Brownhill, S. and J. Darke (1998). Rich Mix: Inclusive Strategies for Urban Regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bruegel, I. (2000). ‘Gender Issues in Regeneration Partnerships’. Unpublished paper delivered to LEPU Seminar on Partnerships, 23 May 2000, South Bank University, London.
Collymore, X. and M. Mayo (2000). ‘Widening Participation through Action Learning in the Community’, in J. Thompson (ed.), Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning in Higher Education. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
Edwards, M. (2001). ‘Introduction’, in M. Edwards and J. Gaventa (eds.), Global Citizen Action. London: Earthscan.
Elsdon, K. et al. (1995). Voluntary Organisations: Citizenship, Learning and Change. Leicester: NIACE.
Fowler, A. (2000). Civil Society, NGDOs and Social Development: Changing the Rules of the Game. Geneva: UNRISD.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
Government Office for London (1999). Single Regeneration Budget Round 6 Bidding Guidance; A Guide for Partnerships in London. London: Government Office for London.
Gramsci, A. (1988). A Gramsci Reader (edited by D. Forgacs). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Gujit, I. and M. Shah (eds.) (1998). The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. London: Intermediate Technology.
Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.
Hastings, A. et al. (1996). Less than Equal? Community Organisations and Estate Regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power. London: Macmillan.
May, N. (1997). Challenging Assumptions: Gender Issues in Urban Regeneration. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Mayo, M. (2001). ‘Children and Young People’s Participation in Development in the South and in Urban Regeneration in the North’. Progress in Development Studies, 1, 4.
Mayo, M. and J. Anastacio (1999). ‘Welfare Models and Approaches to Empowerment’. Policy Studies, 1.
Mayo, M. and G. Craig (1995). ‘Community Participation and Empowerment: the Human Face of Structural Adjustment or Tools for Democratic Transformation’, in G. Craig and M. Mayo (eds.), Community Empowerment. London: Zed Books.
McGivney, V. (1999). Informal Learning in the Community. Leicester: NIACE.
Neighbourhood Renewal Unit (2001). A Learning and Development Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal; A Discussion Paper. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit.
Nelson, N. and S. Wright (1995). ‘Participation and Power’, in N. Nelson and S. Wright (eds.), Power and Participatory Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.
Taylor, M. (1995). Unleashing the Potential. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Taylor, V. (2000). Marketisation or Governance. Cape Town: SADEP, University of Cape Town.
UNDP (1999). Human Development Report 1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNICEF (1989). The State of the World’s Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Women’s Design Service (1999). West Euston Neighbourhood Health and Safety Audit. London: Women’s Design Service.
World Bank (1999). Entering the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayo, M. (2004). Exclusion, Inclusion and Empowerment: Community Empowerment? Reflecting on the Lessons of Strategies to Promote Empowerment. In: Andersen, J., Siim, B. (eds) The Politics of Inclusion and Empowerment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990013_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990013_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51598-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-9001-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)