Abstract
Civil society has, with renewed vigour, announced its comeback within recent sociological and political theory. After some years in the shadows, civil society has come out of the mothballs, been dusted down and wheeled to the front of the theoretical stage. The hope is that the pressing need of modern society for democratisation can once again find its impetus in this sphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck, U. (1994). ‘The Reinvention of Politics’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dean, J. (1995). ‘Reflective Solidarity’. Constellations, 2, 1.
Dean, J. (1996). Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism after Identity Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eriksen, E.O. and J. Weigård (1999). Kommunikativ handling og deliberativt demokrati [Communicative Action and Deliberative Democracy]. Bergen: Fagboklaget.
Fleming, M. (1995). ‘Women and the “Public Use of Reason”’, in J. Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discource. New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Neuwied: Hermann Luchterland Verlag.
Habermas, J. (1992). ‘Futher Reflections on the Public Sphere’, in C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1999). ‘Det sivile samfunn og rettsstaten’ [Civil Society and the Constitutional State], in J. Habermas, Kraften i de bedre argumenter [The Force in the Better Argument]. Selection by Ragnvald Kalleberg, Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
Nielsen, H.B. (1995). ‘Kjønn som irratasjonsmoment i det moderne’ [Gender as a Source of Irritation in the Modern Society ]. Grus, 47, 16.
Offe, C. (1992). ‘Bindings, Shackles, Brakes: On Self-Limitation Strategies’, in A. Honneth et al. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Pateman, C. (1988). ‘The Fraternal Social Contract’, in J. Keane (ed.), Civil Society and the State. London: Verso.
Sandel, M.J. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, I.M. (1998). ‘Impartiality and the Civic Public: Some Implications of Feminist Critiques of Moral and Political Theory’, in J.B. Landes (ed.), Feminism, the Public and the Private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, I.M. (1998). ‘Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship’, in A. Phillips (ed.), Feminism and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ulrich, J. (2004). Deliberative Democracy and Civil Society — An Expansion of Jürgen Habermas’s Understanding of Civil Society. In: Andersen, J., Siim, B. (eds) The Politics of Inclusion and Empowerment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990013_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403990013_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51598-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-9001-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)