Skip to main content

Economic Policy: Responsibility but with Limited Authority

  • Chapter
The Second Term of George W. Bush: Prospects and Perils

Part of the book series: The Evolving American Presidency Series ((EAP))

  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

Aside from matters of war and peace, no policy area commands as much presidential effort or is as important to the president as the economy. From the earliest days of the republic, the quality of the economy affected the fortunes and careers of presidents. Martin Van Buren, for example, lost his re-election bid in 1840 in part because of the economic panic of 1837. Other presidents, and their parties, who presided over bad economic times have been turned out of office, while those in office during good times tended to be returned to office.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the impact of the economy on presidential elections into the nineteenth century see Patrick G. Lynch, “Presidential Elections and the Economy 1872 to 1996: The Times They Are A ‘changin’ or the Song Remains the Same?” Political Research Quarterly 52 (December 1999), pp. 825–844.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Jeffrey E. Cohen, Politics and Economic Policy in the United States. 2d ed. ( Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 2000 ), pp. 145–156;

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Frendreis and Raymond Tatalovich, The Modern Presidency and Economic Policy ( Itasca, IL: Peacock, 1994 );

    Google Scholar 

  4. For an account from both an insider and an economist see Herbert Stein, Presidential Economics: The Making of Economic Policy from Roosevelt to Reagan and Beyond ( Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard W. Stevenson, “News Analysis: Bush’s New Problem: Iraq Could Eclipse Big Domestic Agenda,” New York Times, December 22, 2004 This and all other articles from the New York Times were downloaded from the Times web cite, nytimes.com

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bush has been characterized as policy ambitious throughout his presidency. See Steven L. Schier, ed., High Risk and Big Ambition: The Presidency of George W Bush ( Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Cay Johnson, “I.R.S. Says Americans Income Shrank for 2 Consecutive Years,” New York Times, July 29, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. On Roosevelt see James MacGregor Burns, Roosevelt: The Lion and the Fox ( New York: Harcourt and Brace, 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. On the decisions of cabinet secretaries to stay or leave, see Jeffrey E. Cohen, Politics of the U.S. Cabinet: Representation in the Executive Branch, 1789–1984 ( Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. George C. Edwards III, On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robin Toner, “Political Memo: Good-Will Reserves Run Low for Social Security Talks,” New York Times, December 19, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edmund L. Andrews, “Clamor Grows in the Privatization Debate,” New York Times, December 17, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard W. Stevenson, “Bush Says Social Security Plan Would Reassure Markets,” New York Times, December 17, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance ( Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edmund L. Andrews, “Lawmaker Links Overhauls on Social Security and Taxes,” New York Times, January 19, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edmund L. Andrews, “Republicans Urge the White House to Consider Tax Increases for Social Security,” New York Times, January 20, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. John W. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies 2d ed. ( New York: Longman, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Such a governing style seems common among recent presidents. See Lawrence R. Jacobs and Robert Y. Shapiro, Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness ( Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Robert Maranto, Douglas M. Brattebo, Tom Lansford

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, J.E. (2006). Economic Policy: Responsibility but with Limited Authority. In: Maranto, R., Brattebo, D.M., Lansford, T. (eds) The Second Term of George W. Bush: Prospects and Perils. The Evolving American Presidency Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403984418_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics