Skip to main content
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

In mid-April, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was already efficiently organizing its December campaign, the pan-blue leadership was still wholly mired in forcing an answer to the questions surrounding the March election. The DPP’s continual emphasis on dealing with these questions according to the law was perceived by the pan-blues as a delaying tactic, and the pan-blue leadership had decided their best countermove was to harness the power of the people to force immediate action rather than working within the existing legal system. However, Chen’s remarks regarding the pan-blues’ attempt to mobilize people power were not far off the mark. The pan-blues were not effective in this regard. Even surveys conducted in April by pro-pan-blue newspapers indicated that over 60 percent of the general public opposed the protests. Not only did their popular support wane, but also a number of people within the pan-blue camp lost patience with the top leadership and began to voice their dissent publicly.

As people are walking all the time in the same spot, a path appears.

Lu Xun

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 9 Identity and Culture

  1. Jewel Huang, “PFP legislators call Ma ‘dumb,’ warn him,” Taipei Times, April 12, 2004, http://www.taipeitimes.comNews/taiwan/archives/2004/04/12/2003136345.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jewel Huang, “DPP taking KMT to task on ill-gotten assets issue,” Taipei Times, October 25, 2004, http://www.taipeitimes.comNews/taiwan/archives/2004/10/25/2003208331.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang Tai-lin, “I am not responsible for what I said, Sisy Chen says,” Taipei Times, April 21, 2004, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2004/04/21/2003137500.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang Tai-lin, “KMT: Should we dump our leaders?” Taipei Times, April 13, 2004, http://www.taipeitimes.comNews/taiwan/archives/2004/04/13/2003151565.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lin Chieh-yu, “Chen attacks Soong for harping on victim image,” Taipei Times, November 19, 1999, http://www.taipeitimes.comNews/local/archives/1999/11/19/11257.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jewel Huang, “Murder Chen if he wins election suit, Lien says,” Taipei Times, November 4, 2004, http://www.taipeitimes.comNews/taiwan/archives/2004/11/04/2003209614.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Lin, “Just who can save James Soong?” Taipei Times, April 23, 2004, http://www.taipeitimes.comNews/editorials/archives/2004/04/23/2003137775.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph Bosco, “Taiwan Factions: Guanxi, Patronage, and the State in Local Politics,” Ethnology, 31: 2 (1992), pp. 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Olwen Bedford and Kwang-Kuo Hwang

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bedford, O., Hwang, KK. (2006). Identity and Culture. In: Taiwanese Identity and Democracy: The Social Psychology of Taiwan’s 2004 Elections. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983558_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics