Abstract
“External threats” and “national interests” have almost always been used as two blades of a metaphorical pair of scissors to cut through any opposition to war and militarism. In his well-known Imperialism and Social Classes, the late economic historian Joseph Schumpeter described the hoary pretext of “threatened national interests” for war and militarism in the following words:
There was no corner of the known world where some interest was not alleged to be in danger or under actual attack. If the interests were not Roman, they were those of Rome’s allies; and if Rome had no allies, then allies would be invented. When it was utterly impossible to contrive such an interest—why, then it was the national honor that had been insulted. The fight was always invested with an aura of legality. Rome was always being attacked by evil-minded neighbors, always fighting for a breathing-space. The whole world was pervaded by a host of enemies, and it was manifestly Rome’s duty to guard against their indubitably aggressive designs.
In a similar fashion, the U.S. military-industrial complex has proven quite resourceful in frequently inventing new “external threats to our national interests,” or “the interests of our allies,” in order to stifle opposition to its militaristic plans that are often designed to justify its colossal apparatus and its lion’s share of national resources.
It is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of their leaders. That is easy. All you have to tell them is that they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.
—Hermann Goering (Nuremberg Trials)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004), 56.
Sidney Lens, The Military-Industrial Complex (Kansas City, MO: Pilgrim Press and the National Catholic Reporter, 1970), 18.
Gore Vidal, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace: How We Got To Be So Hated (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books, 2002), 158.
D. E Fleming, The Cold War and Its Origins (New York: Double Day, 1961), 436.
See, e.g., W. A. Williams, The Tragedy of American Diplomacy (Cleveland: World Publishing Company, 1959);
David Horowitz, The Free World Colossus (New York: Hill and Wang, 1965);
Lens, The Military-Industrial Complex; Ismael Hossein-zadeh, “Perestroika and the Third World,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 22, nos. 2 and 3 (1990): 252–275.
Leon Trotsky, The Third International After Lenin (New York: Pathfinder Press, 1970), 66.
William Hyland, “America’s new course,” Foreign Affairs, 69, no. 2 (1990): 3.
T. Sorenson, “Rethinking national security,” Foreign Affairs, 69, no. 3 (1990): 1.
Sheila Ryan, “Power Projection in the Middle East,” in Mobilizing Democracy, edited by Greg Bates (Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, 1991), 45.
A. M. Gray, “Defense Policy for the 1990s,” Marine Corps Gazette, 74, no. 5 (1990): 19.
William A. Galston (deputy assistant to President Clinton for domestic policy from 1993 to 1995), “Why a First Strike Will Surely Backfire,” Washington Post (June 16, 2002), sec. A.
Bill Christison, “The Disastrous Foreign Policies of the United States,” Counterpunch.com (May 9, 2002): <http://www.counterpunch.org/christison 0806.html>.
As cited by Norm Dixon, “How the Bush Gang Seized the ‘Opportunity’ of 9/11,” Green Left Weekly (May 5, 2004): <http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2004/581/581p12.htm>.
Ron Suskind, The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neil (New Jersey: Simon and Schuster, 2004);
James Mann, The Rise of Vulcan: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet (New York: Viking/Penguin Group, 2004);
Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004);
Richard Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004).
As quoted by Norm Dixon, “How Warmongers Exploit 9/11,” Counterpunch.com (September 11, 2002): <http://www.counterpunch.org/dixon0911.html>.
Chalmers Johnson, “America’s Empire of Bases,” tomdispatch.com (January 15, 2004): <http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/artic1e5537.htm>.
Ronald I. Spiers, “How Do You Know When You Win?” Vermont Rutland Herald (June 5, 2004): <http://rutlandherald.com/Archive/Articles/Article/ 81009>.
As cited by Brandon J. Snider, “Manufacturing Terrorism,” antiwar.com (June 14, 2004): <http://www.antiwar.com/blog/index.php?id=P1050>.
Copyright information
© 2006 Ismael Hossein-zadeh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hossein-zadeh, I. (2006). Inventing “Threats to Our National Interests”. In: The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983428_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983428_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53408-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8342-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)