Abstract
Both economic logic and actual developments indicate that occasional expansion of military spending can serve as an economic stimulus, especially during cycles of high unemployment and insufficient demand. Because the nonmilitary private sector tends to become wary of investing and expanding during such periods of doubt and uncertainty, government spending looms as the substitute or alternative stimulus to inject the badly needed purchasing power into the market in order to jump-start the anemic economy. (It was this necessity of government intervention that gave birth to the 1930s New Deal in the United States, and to Keynesian economics, or demand-management, more generally.)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ernest Mandel, Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975), chapter 9.
See, e.g., Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Vintage Books, 1989);
Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004).
Ernest Mandel, Long Waves of Capitalist Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), see especially pp. 20–22 and 51–52.
Smedley D. Butler, War Is a Racket (Los Angeles: Feral House, 1935 [2003]), 39.
Copyright information
© 2006 Ismael Hossein-zadeh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hossein-zadeh, I. (2006). Limits of U.S. Militarism. In: The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983428_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983428_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53408-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8342-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)