States and Development:What Insights Did We Gain?
There are those to whom the idea that states have a major role to play in advancing social and economic development is anathema.To them, state intervention of any kind equals distortion of economic allocation and the proliferation of unproductive rents for a few. They have their counterpart in others who morally reject the market as nothing more than institutionalized greed and selfishness.Yet both of these positions have lost support and become marginal.
KeywordsEffective State Bureaucratic State Economic Allocation Bureaucratic Organization Japanese Colonialism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Evans, Peter, and James Rauch. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Economic Review,64:748–765.Google Scholar
- Lenski, Gerhard. 1966. Power and Privilege. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sachs, Jeffrey. 2004.“Doing the Sums on Africa.” The Economist, May 22: 19–21.Google Scholar
- Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In,edited by P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol.New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–37.Google Scholar
- Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society.Trans. Ephraim Fishof f. NewYork.Bedminster Press.Google Scholar