The Social Factors: Births, Schools, Divorces, Ideas

  • Barbara R. Bergmann

Abstract

Yesterday’s women viewed their marriage as lifelong, and expected big families. Many of them knew that their parents had supported their brothers’ education and aspirations while scanting theirs. They were used to hearing themselves described as weak and silly, and many of them thought it advantageous to describe themselves in that way.

Keywords

Dust Europe Income Expense Tated 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing office, 1960), p. 24.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    National Vital Statistics System, “Births: Preliminary Data for 2000,” National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol$149, No. 5, June 24, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Nancy Folbre, “Of Patriarchy Born: The Political Economy of Fertility Decisions,” Feminist Studies 9, 2 (summer 1983): 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    Historical Statistics and Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Occupational Employment and Wages, 2001,” November 6, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Warren C. Sanderson, “Qualitative Aspects of Marriage, Fertility and Family Limitation in Nineteenth Century America: Another Application of the Coale Specifications,” Demography 16, 3 (August 1979): 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.
    Pascal K. Whelpton and Clyde V. Kiser, Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility (New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1950).Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Margaret Sanger, An Autobiography (New York: Dover, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Arland Thornton and Deborah Freedman, The Changing American Family, Population Reference Bureau, Inc., Vol. 38, No. 4 (October 1983).Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    Claudia Goldin, “From the Valley to the Summit: The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Work,” NBER Working Paper No. 10335, March 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    National Vital Statistics System, “Trends in Pregnancies and Pregnancy Rates by Outcome: Estimates for the United States, 1976–96,” National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol$121, No. 56, February 11, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    Carol Cassell, Swept Away: Why Women Fear Their Own Sexuality (New York: Simon (Sc Schuster, 1984).Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Gary Becker and Richard Easterlin favored such theories. See Paul T. Schultz, The Economics of Population (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981).Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    See Alice Nakamura and Masao Nakamura, The Second Paycheck: An Analysis of the Employment and Earnings of Married Women (New York: Academic Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2000, p. 183.Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Usual Weekly Earnings of Wage and Salary Workers: Second Quarter 2001,” USDL 01–228, July 19, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. 24.
    Kingsley Davis, “The Future of Marriage,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 36, 8 (May 1983): 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 28.
    Barbara Ehrenreich, The Hearts of Men: American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment (New York: Doubleday, 1983).Google Scholar
  18. 29.
    Martha Guttentag and Paul F. Secord, Too Many Women: The Sex Ratio Question (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983).Google Scholar
  19. 33.
    Ernest A.T. Barth and W.B. Watson, “Social Stratification and the Family in Mass Society,” Social Forces 45 (1967): 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 35.
    Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Women and Economics (New York: Harper & Row, 1966), p. 157.Google Scholar
  21. 36.
    Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953).Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (New York: WW. Norton, 1963).Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson (eds), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  24. see also Barbara R. Bergmann, “Becker’s Theory of the Family: Preposterous Conclusions,” Feminist Economics 1, 1 (spring 1995).Google Scholar
  25. 40.
    Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: The Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  26. Paula England, “The Failure of Human Capital Theory to Explain Occupational Sex Segregation,” Journal of Human Resources 17 (1982): 358–370;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. William T. Bielby and James N. Barron, “A Woman’s Place is With Other Women: Sex Segregation Within Organizations,” in Barbara E Reskin (ed.), Sex Segregation in the Workplace (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984), pp. 27–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Barbara R. Bergmann 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara R. Bergmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations