Skip to main content

Participatory Development and Liberal Reforms in Tunisia: The Gradual Incorporation of Some Economic Networks

  • Chapter
Networks of Privilege in the Middle East: The Politics of Economic Reform Revisited

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, political economists have devoted a great deal of attention to the potential impact of liberal and fiscal reforms on the economic structures and social and political systems of Mediterranean Non-Member Countries (MNCs), while focusing, among other things, on the gradual exposure of domestic firms to international competition, the dismantling of trade barriers, and the consequential loss of fiscal revenue. The need for enhanced credibility and financial support from foreign donors are often mentioned to explain the adherence of some MNCs to the drastic measures advocated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the European Union (EU). However, scant attention has been given to the multifarious ways in which liberal and fiscal reforms have been understood—if not reinterpreted—by some Middle Eastern governments. This chapter deals with the ways in which the Tunisian government has been successful in reinterpreting the scope of its liberal economic reforms, and with the dynamics that have gradually shaped the relationships between the government and some leading entrepreneurs of the Tunisian manufacturing industry since the early 1990s, while redefining the patterns of participatory development in Tunisia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This argument is analyzed by Riadh Zghal, “Le Développement participa-toire. Participation et monde du travail en Tunisie,” in Driss Guerraoui and Xavier Richet, eds., Stratégies de privatisation: comparaison Maghreb-Europe (L’Harmattan/Casablanca/Paris: Les Editions Toubkal, 1995), 210.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a more comprehensive analysis of the PMN, see Jean-Pierre Cassarino, “The EU-Tunisian Association Agreement and Tunisia’s Structural Reform Program,” The Middle East Journal 53, no. 1 (1999): 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goren Hyden, “Governance and the Study of Politics,” in Goran Hyden and Michael Bratton, eds., Governance and Politics in Africa (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sadiq Rasheed and David Fashole Luke, “Toward a New Development Management Paradigm,” in Rasheed and Fashole Luke, eds., Development Management in Africa: Toward Dynamism, Empowerment, and Entrepreneurship (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), 4. “Development management” pertains to the fact that “development is no longer solely the state or public sector responsibility.”

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wayne E. Baker, “The Network Organization in Theory and Practice,” in Robert G. Eccles and Nitin Nohira, eds., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992): 400.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karen S. Cook and J. M. Whitmeyer, “Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology 18 (1992): 110. In an earlier article, and with reference to “valued items,” Cook argues that “ties between actors are established, maintained, or broken primarily in terms of the ‘value’ provided by exchange relations […].”

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. See Karen S. Cook, “Network Structures From an Exchange Perspective,” in Peter V. Marsden and Nan Lin, eds., Social Structure and Network Analysis (London: Sage Publications Ltd. 1982): 195.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The industrialists of the 1970s had been employed previously as civil servants who “were permitted a two-year leave of absence to try their hand in the private sector, during which time their positions and seniority in the public sector would be guaranteed.” Eva R. Bellin, “Tunisian Industrialists and the State,” in I. William Zartman, ed., Tunisia: The Political Economy of Reform (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1991): 51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eva R. Bellin, “The Politics of Profit in Tunisia: Utility of the Rentier Paradigm?” World Development 22, no. 3 (1994): 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. See Russell Hardin, One for All: The Logics of Group Conflict (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joel S. Migdal, “The State in Society: An Approach to Struggles for Domination,” in Joel S. Migdal, Atul Kohli, and Vivienne Shue, eds., State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994): 12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Steven Heydemann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cassarino, JP. (2004). Participatory Development and Liberal Reforms in Tunisia: The Gradual Incorporation of Some Economic Networks. In: Heydemann, S. (eds) Networks of Privilege in the Middle East: The Politics of Economic Reform Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982148_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics