Abstract
Since the early 1990s, political economists have devoted a great deal of attention to the potential impact of liberal and fiscal reforms on the economic structures and social and political systems of Mediterranean Non-Member Countries (MNCs), while focusing, among other things, on the gradual exposure of domestic firms to international competition, the dismantling of trade barriers, and the consequential loss of fiscal revenue. The need for enhanced credibility and financial support from foreign donors are often mentioned to explain the adherence of some MNCs to the drastic measures advocated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the European Union (EU). However, scant attention has been given to the multifarious ways in which liberal and fiscal reforms have been understood—if not reinterpreted—by some Middle Eastern governments. This chapter deals with the ways in which the Tunisian government has been successful in reinterpreting the scope of its liberal economic reforms, and with the dynamics that have gradually shaped the relationships between the government and some leading entrepreneurs of the Tunisian manufacturing industry since the early 1990s, while redefining the patterns of participatory development in Tunisia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
This argument is analyzed by Riadh Zghal, “Le Développement participa-toire. Participation et monde du travail en Tunisie,” in Driss Guerraoui and Xavier Richet, eds., Stratégies de privatisation: comparaison Maghreb-Europe (L’Harmattan/Casablanca/Paris: Les Editions Toubkal, 1995), 210.
For a more comprehensive analysis of the PMN, see Jean-Pierre Cassarino, “The EU-Tunisian Association Agreement and Tunisia’s Structural Reform Program,” The Middle East Journal 53, no. 1 (1999): 59–74.
Goren Hyden, “Governance and the Study of Politics,” in Goran Hyden and Michael Bratton, eds., Governance and Politics in Africa (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992): 7.
Sadiq Rasheed and David Fashole Luke, “Toward a New Development Management Paradigm,” in Rasheed and Fashole Luke, eds., Development Management in Africa: Toward Dynamism, Empowerment, and Entrepreneurship (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), 4. “Development management” pertains to the fact that “development is no longer solely the state or public sector responsibility.”
Wayne E. Baker, “The Network Organization in Theory and Practice,” in Robert G. Eccles and Nitin Nohira, eds., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992): 400.
Karen S. Cook and J. M. Whitmeyer, “Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology 18 (1992): 110. In an earlier article, and with reference to “valued items,” Cook argues that “ties between actors are established, maintained, or broken primarily in terms of the ‘value’ provided by exchange relations […].”
See Karen S. Cook, “Network Structures From an Exchange Perspective,” in Peter V. Marsden and Nan Lin, eds., Social Structure and Network Analysis (London: Sage Publications Ltd. 1982): 195.
The industrialists of the 1970s had been employed previously as civil servants who “were permitted a two-year leave of absence to try their hand in the private sector, during which time their positions and seniority in the public sector would be guaranteed.” Eva R. Bellin, “Tunisian Industrialists and the State,” in I. William Zartman, ed., Tunisia: The Political Economy of Reform (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1991): 51.
Eva R. Bellin, “The Politics of Profit in Tunisia: Utility of the Rentier Paradigm?” World Development 22, no. 3 (1994): 431.
See Russell Hardin, One for All: The Logics of Group Conflict (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).
Joel S. Migdal, “The State in Society: An Approach to Struggles for Domination,” in Joel S. Migdal, Atul Kohli, and Vivienne Shue, eds., State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994): 12.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Steven Heydemann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cassarino, JP. (2004). Participatory Development and Liberal Reforms in Tunisia: The Gradual Incorporation of Some Economic Networks. In: Heydemann, S. (eds) Networks of Privilege in the Middle East: The Politics of Economic Reform Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982148_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982148_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52756-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8214-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)