Advertisement

Apollo, God of Enterprise

  • Ted Underwood

Abstract

The Romantic revival of polytheism was selective. Zeus, Hera, Ares, and even the nine Muses remained antique names; the sun-gods, on the other hand (Hyperion, Apollo, Helios, and, as a kind of mediator with the sun, Prometheus) became favorite protagonists. The disproportionate emphasis on the sun extended beyond Hellenism: British Romantic writers also developed a strain of Zoroastrian poetry that interpreted Ormusd (or Oromazde) as a god of fire and sunlight.1 The names of Peruvian and Egyptian sun-gods could be added to the list, if listing deities weren’t finally beside the point. Romantic mythographers, including Charles-François Dupuis and William Drummond, transformed all gods into sun-gods, by arguing that religion itself was originally sun-worship. The religious impulse, in Dupuis’ account, springs from man’s gratitude for light’s “creative energy”—”the true principle of our existence, without which our life would only be a sensation of protracted weariness.”2 Though the original meaning may have been covered up or forgotten, all religious stories— including the birth and death of Christ—were according to Dupuis once representations of the sun’s daily journey across the sky or yearly journey through the stations of the zodiac.

Keywords

Natural Force Natural Philosopher Human Energy Burning Energy Middle Rank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Marilyn Butler, “Romantic Manichaeism: Shelley’s ‘On the Devil, and Devils’ and Byron’s Mythological Dramas,” The Sun is God: Painting, Literature, and Mythology in the Nineteenth Century, ed. J. B. Bullen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 15.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charles-François Dupuis, Abrégé de l’origine de tous les cultes (1795; repr., Paris: Bossange, 1820), 96. See also William Drummond, The Œdipus Judaicus (London:Valpy, 1811), 142–43, 160–61. For a Christian version of this argument, identifying sun-worship as the original form of paganism, but explaining it as a corruption of the even older “true” religion, see Jacob Bryant, A New System, or an Analysis of Ancient Mythology, 3 vols. (1775–1776; repr., New York: Garland, 1979), especially 1:1–2, 1:305–17.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Friedrich Hölderlin, “Patmos,” Poems and Fragments, trans. Michael Hamburger (London: Anvil, 1994), 482–507.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge, “Religious Musings,” Complete Poetical Works, ed. E. H. Coleridge, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), 1:108–25.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    John Milton, Paradise Lost, ed. Scott Elledge (New York: W.W. Norton, 1975), 56–57 (3:1–5).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Isaac Newton, Opticks; or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Coloms of Light (New York: Dover, 1952), 401.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    P. M. Heimann and J. E. McGuire, “Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (1971): 233–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 10.
    G. W. F. Hegel, The Philosophy of History, trans. J. Sibree (New York: Dover, 1956), 103.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. Carol H. Poston (New York: Norton, 1975), 52, 57.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    J. G. A. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 14.
    James Thomson, “Liberty,” The Complete Poetical Works of fames Thomson, ed. J. Logic Robertson (London: Oxford University Press, 1908), 395 (5:121–23).Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), 446–48.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Jerome McGann, The Poetics of Sensibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 113.Google Scholar
  14. 24.
    The similarity lies in Marx’s early conception of alienation as alienation from nature. See Karl Marx, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961), 74.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Letter 27c/6, ms., Humphry Davy Papers. This letter is also printed in Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Collected Letters, ed. E. L. Griggs, 6 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956), 1:630. Griggs has “grandly” instead of “gravely,” which I think is a transcription error. The note on p. 630 also has the wrong title for Davy’s poem.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Clement Carlyon, Early Years and Late Reflections, vol. 1 (London: Whittaker, 1858), 234–35.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    See Alice Jenkins, “Humphry Davy: Poetry, Science, and the Love of Light,” 1798: The Year of the Lyrical Ballads, ed. Richard Cronin (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1998), 133–50.Google Scholar
  18. 36.
    Humphry Davy, “The Sons of Genius,” The Poetry of Humphry Davy, ed. Alison Pritchard (Penwith: Penwith District Council, 1978), 2–4.Google Scholar
  19. 44.
    Walter Burkert, Greek Religion, trans. John Raffan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985), 145–48.Google Scholar
  20. 48.
    John Keats, The Poems of John Keats, ed. Jack Stillinger (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978), 92.Google Scholar
  21. 49.
    Ian Jack, Keats and the Mirror of Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), 180.Google Scholar
  22. 50.
    John Keats, letter to John Taylor, February 27, 1818, The Letters of John Keats, ed. Hyder Edward Rollins, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958), 1:238–39.Google Scholar
  23. 53.
    Homer, Odyssey, trans. Richmond Lattimore (New York: Harper, 1967), 27.Google Scholar
  24. 54.
    Neil H. Hertz, “Wordsworth and the Tears of Adam,” Studies in Romanticism 1 (1967): 18.Google Scholar
  25. 55.
    David V. Erdman, The Illuminated Blake (New York: Doubleday, 1974), 174.Google Scholar
  26. 56.
    Erdman, Illuminated Blake, 181. On the redness of the sun, see Stuart Peterfreund, William Blake in a Newtonian World: Essays on Literature as Art and Science, Series for Science and Culture (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998), 160–61.Google Scholar
  27. 57.
    Northrop Frye, Fearful Symmetry: A Study of William Blake (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1947), 140.Google Scholar
  28. 58.
    See Mark Lussier, Romantic Dynamics: The Poetics of Physicality (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), 47–63.Google Scholar
  29. 59.
    Morris Eaves, The Counter-Arts Conspiracy: Art and Industry in the Age of Blake (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992), 175–253.Google Scholar
  30. 61.
    Michael Ferber describes Jerusalem’s account of alienated labor in The Social Vision of William Blake (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), 131. See also David Punter, “Blake: Creative and Uncreative Labor,” Studies in Romanticism 16 (1977): 535–61, esp. 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 62.
    W. J. T. Mitchell, “Poetic and Pictorial Imagination in Blake’s The Book of Urizen,” Eighteenth Century Studies 3 (1969): 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ted Underwood 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Underwood

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations