Energy and the Autonomy of Middle-Class Work

  • Ted Underwood

Abstract

Until the eighteenth century, energy was a learned term, common only in texts of metaphysics and rhetoric. After 1750, it rapidly became a buzzword. The frequency of energy and energetic in the written record tripled between 1750 and 1800.1 (The frequency of the French cognate, énergie, quadrupled over the same period.2) The word began to appear in novels and in personal letters; in the last quarter of the century, energy-talk was so much in vogue that it became an object of parody on both sides of the English Channel.3 This chapter argues that the new popularity of energy and its cognates was bound up with a change in the expression of the work ethic. Instead of describing work as a conscious product of the moral will, writers began to compare the energy of the worker to the spontaneous energies of nature.

Keywords

Expense Sponge Straw Indol Egypt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Ted Underwood, “Productivism and the Vogue for ‘Energy’ in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain,” Studies in Romanticism 34 (1995): 106–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    British parodies of energy-talk are cited later in this chapter. For French examples, see Michel Delon, L’idée d’énergie au tournant des Lumières (1770–1820) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988), 143–49. In this otherwise indispensable account, Delon denies that there was a connection between énergie and middle-class aspiration, remarking that energy cannot have been a middle-class value because it “is capable of opening up expenditure and excess, and of subverting any principle of order, of wise management, of regulated production” (33). This objection is based on a caricature of nineteenth-century middle-class values. It was not “regulated production,” but individual autonomy, that middle-class writers idealized in the late eighteenth century.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    For more on the connection between energy and spontaneity, see Stuart Peterfreund, “The Re-Emergence of Energy in the Discourse of Literature and Science,” Annals of Scholarship: Metastudies of the Humanities and Social Sciences 4 (1986–1987): 22–53.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Steven Shapin, “Social Uses of Science,” The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, ed. G. S. Rousseau and Roy Porter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 134–39.Google Scholar
  5. See also Simon Schaffer, “States of Mind: Enlightenment and Natural Philosophy,” The Languages of Psyche, ed. G. S. Rousseau (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 233–90.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aristotle , Metaphysics, Loeb Classical Library, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936), 11.9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aristotle , The Art of Rhetoric, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939), 3.11.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Sir Philip Sidney, “Defence of Poesie,” Complete Works, ed. A. Feuillerat, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1923), 41.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Henry Fielding, The Covent- Garden Journal and a Plan of the Universal Register-Office (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1988), 185. I am indebted to Martin Price’s discussion of the connection between energy and sentimental moral philosophy in Fielding. Price persuasively connects this to a discussion of Fielding’s narrative forms.Google Scholar
  10. Martin Price, To the Palace of Wisdom: Studies in Order and Energy from Dryden to Blake (New York: Doubleday, 1964), 288.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henry Fielding, The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling, ed. Martin C. Battestin and Fredson Bowers, 2 vols. (Oxford: Weslayan University Press, 1975), 2:687 (book 13, chap. 1).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Denis Diderot, “Essai sur le mérite et le vertu,” Œuvres Complètes, vol. 1 (Paris: Hermann, 1975), 100.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, La nouvelle Héloïse, vol. 2 (Paris: Hachette, 1925), 273.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ann Radcliffe, The Mysteries of Udolpho, ed. Bonamy Dobrée (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 182.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    See John W. Yolton, Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Minneapolis: University of Minessota Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. A. C. Fraser, 2 vols. (New York: Dover, 1959), 1:312.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    J. E. McGuire, “Force, Active Principles, and Newton’s Invisible Realm,” Ambix 15 (1968): 154–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 23.
    The Leyden jar is a simple condenser, with two surfaces bearing opposite charges separated by glass. For its effect on electrical demonstrations and electrical theory, see J. L. Heilbron, Electricity in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), 313–16. For mid-century testimony to the importance of these demonstrations, see Richard Lovett, Philosophical Essays (London: J. Johnson, 1766), v, 7, 240.Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    Edmund Burke, “A Letter to John Farr and John Harris, Esqrs., Sheriffs of the City of Bristol, on the Affairs of America,” The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, 12 vols. (London: George Bell & Sons, 1875–1876), 2:31.Google Scholar
  20. 31.
    Isaac Kramnick, Republicanism and Bourgeois Radicalism: Political Ideology in Late Eighteenth-Century England and America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990), 60.Google Scholar
  21. 33.
    J. G. A. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 260–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 35.
    Middle-class identity was also invoked by other groups, for other political ends. For an exploration of the widely-diverging interests served by the “middle-class idiom” in the 1790s, see Dror Wahrman, Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c.1780–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 31–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 36.
    J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975), 391.Google Scholar
  24. 39.
    Stephen Wallech, “‘Class Versus Rank’: The Transformation of Eighteenth-Century English Social Terms and Theories of Production,” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 409–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 40.
    Henry Brooke, The Fool of Quality; or, the History of Henry Earl of Moreland, 2nd ed., 5 vols. (London: W. Johnston, 1767–70), 5:36–37. See also the discussion of Brooke in Markman Ellis, The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 129–59.Google Scholar
  26. 41.
    H.T. Dickinson, Liberty and Property: Political Ideology in Eighteenth-Century Britain (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1977), 226–27. “No taxation without representation” was a slogan with almost as much resonance in England as in the colonies; see, for instance, John Cartwright, Take Your Choice! (London: J. Almon, 1776), 20–21.Google Scholar
  27. 42.
    This new model of the political significance of work also generated newly intense anxieties about idleness. See Sarah Jordan, The Anxieties of Idleness: Idleness in Eighteenth-Century British Literature and Culture (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  28. 43.
    Thomas Holcroft, The Adventures of Hugh Trevor, ed. Seamus Deane (London: Oxford University Press, 1973), 3.Google Scholar
  29. 46.
    William Godwin, Caleb Williams, ed. David McCracken (London: Oxford University Press, 1970), 218–19.Google Scholar
  30. 47.
    Paul Keen, The Crisis of Literature in the 1790s: Print Culture and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 98, 81—99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 48.
    Magali Sarfatti Larson, The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), 1–5.Google Scholar
  32. For an argument challenging this conclusion—though, I think, unconvincingly—see Wilfrid Prest, “The Professions and Society in Early Modern England,” The Professions in Early Modern England, ed. Wilfrid Prest (London: Croom Helm, 1987), 1–24. Prest establishes that the eighteenth-century professions often recruited their members from the middle classes, and also that they served the middle classes. But this evidence does not address the decisive question: whether the market for professional services was stratified according to an autonomous logic, or according to the heteronomous principle of gentility.Google Scholar
  33. 49.
    W.J. Reader, Professional Men:The Rise of the Professional Classes in Nineteenth-Century England (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966), 41. For a theory of the professions as “monopolies of training” and “monopolies of competence” see Larson, 222–25.Google Scholar
  34. 50.
    Clifford Siskin, The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), 103–09.Google Scholar
  35. 51.
    Charles Edmonds, ed., Poetry of the Anti-Jacobin (London: Sampson, 1890), 147.Google Scholar
  36. 54.
    For more on this satirical strategy, see Maurice Crosland, “The Image of Science as a Threat: Burke versus Priestley and the ‘Philosophic Revolution,’” British Journal for the History of Science 20 (1987): 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. It is also possible that British satirists might have been aware of the association of Mesmeric “animal magnetism” with radical politics in France. This tradition is discussed in Robert Darnton, Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968), 83–105, 164.Google Scholar
  38. 59.
    Stephen Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 29–30. This book’s title and first chapter incidentally demonstrate that a metaphor of social energy continues to inform late-twentieth-century writing. The metaphor plays a different role in contemporary literary criticism than it did in the 1790s;Google Scholar
  39. see Ted Underwood, “Romantic Historicism and the Afterlife,” PMLA 117 (2002): 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 60.
    Frank J. Messman, Richard Payne Knight: The Twilight of Virtuosity (Paris: Mouton, 1973), 9–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ted Underwood 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Underwood

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations