Light as Fluid Agency

  • Ted Underwood

Abstract

A study of correlations between work and natural force might well begin in the 1820s, when G. G. Coriolis defined work mathematically. But to be gin at that point would evade an interesting historical problem. Late-eighteenth-century physicians and philosophers began to assume that human work was commensurable with a vital power diffused through nature before they had settled on an appropriate dimension of measurement for work or for vital power. This chapter investigates the motives that prompted that hasty assumption. I begin by asking how eighteenth-century natural philosophers came to view light, in particular, as a common denominator that united different kinds of agency.

Keywords

Fermentation Steam Respiration Refraction Calorimeter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Isaac Newton, Opticks (New York: Dover, 1952), 401.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Stephen Wallech, “‘Class Versus Rank’: The Transformation of Eighteenth-Century English Social Terms and Theories of Production,” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 409–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    Versions of this phrase are scattered widely in eighteenth-century literature. This one happens to come from James Thomson, “Liberty,” The Complete Poetical Works of James Thomson, ed. J. Logie Robertson (London: Oxford University Press, 1908), 409 (5:604).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    This list is not exclusive. Approaching the question from the perspective of natural history, one could just as reasonably emphasize the disappearance of an informing vegetative principle that was distinct from common matter on the one hand and from the soul on the other. Mid-eighteenth-century debates over living form dispense with this hypothesis, preferring to combine something preexisting (whether a germ or an “internal mold”) with attractive forces that set it in motion. See James L. Larson, Interpreting Nature: The Science of Living Form from Linnaeus to Kant (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), 132–69.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    See e.g., Jean Baptiste van Helmont, “Spiritus vitae,” Ortus Medicinae (Amsterdam, 1648), 195–201. The role of solar symbolism in alchemy is discussed in B.J. T. Dobbs, The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 38–45.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Isaac Newton, “Of Natures Obvious Laws & Processes in Vegetation,” The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought, by B.J.T. Dobbs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 265.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Newton, Opticks, 374. Stephen Hales, Vegetable Staticks (1727; rpt. London: Oldbourne, 1961), 186–87.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    For a fuller discussion of the changing meaning of “active principles” in Newton’s career see J. E. McGuire, “Force, Active Principles, and Newton’s Invisible Realm,” Ambix 15 (1968): 154–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 16.
    P. M. Heimann, “‘Nature is a Perpetual Worker’: Newton’s Æther and Eighteenth-Century Natural Philosophy,” Ambix 20 (1973): 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 17.
    Herman Boerhaave (1668–1738) formed a theory of fire that was indebted to Newton’s Opticks, and J.T. Desaguliers’s Course of Experimental Philosophy (1734–1744) represented Newton’s queries from the Opticks as if they were confirmed truth. See I. Bernard Cohen, Franklin and Newton, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 43 (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1956), 232, 254.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Robert Schofield, Mechanism and Materialism: British Natural Philosophy in an Age of Reason (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), 157–90.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Gaston Bachelard, The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. Alan C. M. Ross (Boston: Beacon Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  14. 25.
    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. A. C. Fraser, 2 vols. (New York: Dover, 1959), 1:166–82 (book. 2, chap. 8).Google Scholar
  15. 26.
    The history of this argument is explored in P. M. Heimann and J. E. McGuire, “Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (1971): 233–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 35.
    Jean Senebier, Mémoires physico-chymiques sur l’influence de la lumière solaire pour modifier les êtres des trois règnes de la nature, et sur-tout ceux du règne végétal, 3 vols. (Geneve: Chiral, 1782), 1:376—80. For a fuller discussion of Senebier’s chemical mechanisms, see Leonard K. Nash, Plants and the Atmosphere (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952), 71–95.Google Scholar
  17. 41.
    Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier, Elements of Chemistry, trans. Robert Kerr (1790; rpt. New York: Dover, 1965), 183–84.Google Scholar
  18. 44.
    Guenter B. Risse, “Brunonian Therapeutics: New Wine in Old Bottles?” Brunonianism in Britain and Europe, ed. W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter, Medical History (London: Wellcome Institute, 1988), 46–62.Google Scholar
  19. 48.
    Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier and Armand Seguin, “Premier mémoire sur la respiration des animaux,” Œuvres, by Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier, vol. 2 (Paris: Imprimerie impériabe, 1862), 2:692.Google Scholar
  20. 49.
    John Thelwall, An Essay Towards a Definition of Animal Vitality (London, 1793), 39–40. Nicholas Roe, “‘Atmospheric Air Itself: Medical Science, Politics, and Poetry in Thelwall, Coleridge, and Wordsworth,” 1798: The Year of the Lyrical Ballads, ed. Richard Cronin (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1998), 185–202.Google Scholar
  21. 54.
    Jean-Pierre Poirier, Lavoisier: Chemist, Biologist, Economist, trans. Rebecca Balinski (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996), 170–73.Google Scholar
  22. 55.
    Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, Lavoisier: Mémoires d’une révolution (Paris: Flammarion, 1993), 215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ted Underwood 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Underwood

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations