Skip to main content

Biblical Promise and Threat in U.S. Imperialist Rhetoric, Before and After 9/11

  • Chapter
Interventions

Abstract

Given that conservative Protestantism is all too apparently alive and well in the United States, it may be prudent to consider how common interpretations of the Bible become part of the political calculus. Many people on the Left bemoan the Christian Right without paying attention to precisely how biblical interpretations get incorporated into right-wing discourse, and what recognizing biblical influence on politics might mean for engaging bellicose, imperialist rhetoric such as that of the younger Bush administration. In other words, I am urging consideration of the way in which the primacy of the Bible—particularly, belief in the absolute, inerrant truth and authority of the Bible, and adherence to “fundamentals” of the faith therein—affects policy and military decisions on the part of government, and acceptance of those decisions by the American people. The public’s response to the U.S. wars since 9/11 may be affected by the overlap between longstanding, biblically inflected, national discourses on the one hand, and personalized understandings of the Bible popular in conservative Protestant circles on the other.

Much of the analysis of the apocalyptic nature of the rhetoric discussed here was initially worked out in the preparation of an arrested piece of street theatre called “the burning bush,” conceived with Michael Casey, Daniel Lang/Levitsky, and Meredith Slopen. My development of these ideas has been greatly assisted through conversations with Elizabeth Castelli and Jennifer Glancy, and through the critical eyes, cast upon earlier drafts, of Michael Casey, Tanya Erzen, and Scott Kline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 48.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Ahmed, Leila. 1992. Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Fred. 2003. “God and Man in the Oval Office.” Weekly Standard 8(26) (March 17): 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N. 1970. Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post Traditionalist World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N. 1975. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1983. “The Biblical Basis of the American Myth.” In The Bible and American Arts and Letters, ed. Giles Gunn, 221–32. Philadelphia: Fortress; Chico, CA: Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, George W. 1999. A Charge to Keep: My journey to the White House. New York: Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, George W. 2002a. “Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington D.C., June 6.http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020606–8.html.

  • Bush, George W. 2002b. “President’s Remarks to the Nation.” Ellis Island, NY, September 11.http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020911–3.html.

  • Bush, George W. 2002c. “Remarks by the President in Address to the United Nations General Assembly.” New York, NY. September 12.http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-l.html.

  • Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Mary Wilson. 1995. “Representing Apocalypse: Sexual Politics and the Violence of Revelation.” In Fostmodern Apocalypse: Theory and Cultural Practice at the End, ed. Richard Dellamora, 107–35. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, Elizabeth A. 2003. “Globalization, Transnational Feminisms, and the Future of Biblical Critique.” Paper presented at the conference The Global Future of Feminist New Testament Studies at Scripps College, Claremont, Calif. February 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, George E. 2002. “Covenants and Criticism: Deuteronomy and the American Founding.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 32(1): 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debord, Guy. 1983 [1967]. Society of the Spectacle. Trans. Black and Red. Detroit: Black and Red.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Laura E. 1996. “Postcolonialism and Biblical Reading: An Introduction.” Semeia 75: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Laura E. 2002. “The Breast of Columbus: A Political Anatomy of Postcolonial and Feminist Religious Discourse.” In Postcolonialism, Feminism, and Religious Discourse, ed. Laura E. Donaldson and Kwok Pui-lan, 41–61. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Thomas. 2000. Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. Washington, D.C.: Project for the New American Century, http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel J. 1980. “The Political Theory of Covenant: Biblical Origins and Modern Developments.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 10(4): 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel J. 1995. Covenant and Polity in Biblical Israel: Biblical Foundations and Jewish Expressions. Covenant Tradition in Politics 1. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel J., and John Kincaid, eds. 1980. Covenant, Polity, and Constitutionalism. Vol. 10(4) of Publius: The]ournal of Federalism. Philadelphia: Center for the Study of Federalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exum, J. Cheryl. 1996. Plotted, Shot, and Painted: Cultural Representations of Biblical Women. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 215. Gender, Culture, Theory 3. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falwell, Jerry. 1999. Interview by Cal Thomas. In Blinded by Might: Can the Religious Right Save America? by Cal Thomas and Ed Dobson, 259–78. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, Silvia. 2002. Panel presentation, “Women and War.” Judson Memorial Church. New York City. March 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, Howard. 2003. “Bush and God.” Newsweek 141(10) (March 10): 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, Edward McGlynn. 1985. “The Interaction of Biblical Religion and American Constitutional Law.” In The Bible in American Law, Politics, and Political Rhetoric, ed. James Turner Johnson, 81–106. Philadelphia: Fortress; Chico, CA: Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutterman, David S. 2001. “Presidential Testimony: Listening to the Heart of George W. Bush.” Theory and Event 5(2)http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.2gutterman.html.

  • Hillers, Delbert R. 1984. Micah: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Micah. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoodfar, Horna. 2001. “The Veil in Their Minds and on Our Heads: Veiling Practices and Muslim Women.” In Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader, ed. Elizabeth A. Castelli with Rosamond C. Rodman, 420–46. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingebretsen, Edward J. 1996. Maps of Heaven, Maps of Hell: Religious Terror as Memory from the Puritans to Stephen King. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Amy. 1993. “‘Left Alone with America’: The Absence of Empire in the Study of American Culture.” In Cultures of United States Imperialism, ed. Amy Kaplan and Donald E. Pease, 3–21. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Catherine. 1996. Apocalypse Now and Then: A Feminist Guide to the End of the World. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Donald S. 1980. “From Covenant to Constitution in American Political Thought.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 10(4): 101–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Donald S. 1988. The Origins of American Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Donald S. 1990a. “The Mayflower Compact, 1620.” In The Roots of the Republic: American Founding Documents Interpreted, ed. Stephen L. Schechter, 17–23. Madison, WI: Madison House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Donald S. 1990b. “The Declaration of Independence, 1776.” In The Roots of the Republic: American Founding Documents Interpreted, ed. Stephen L. Schechter, 138–19. Madison, WI: Madison House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Donald S. 1992. A Preface to American Political Theory. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, Cotton. 1950 [1692]. The Wonders of the Invisible World. Mount Vernon, N.Y.: Peter Pauper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, James Luther. 1976. Micah: A Commentary. Old Testament Library. Philadelphia: Westminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, Melani. 2003. “Prophecy, Politics, and the Popular: The Left Behind Series and Christian Fundamentalism’s New World Order.” South Atlantic Quarterly 102: 773–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKane, William. 1998. The Book of Micah: Introduction and Commentary. Edinburgh: T and T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhou, Alain. 1999. “Apocalypticism in Central and South American Colonialism.” In Vol. 3 of The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, ed. Stephen J. Stein. Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age, 3–35. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moallem, Minoo. 1999. “The Textualization of Violence in a Global World: Gendered Citizenship and Discourse of Protection.” Review of Japanese Culture and Soaety 11–12 (December 1999–2000): 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moallem, Minoo. 2001 [1999]. “Transnationalism, Feminism, and Fundamentalism.” In Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader, ed. Elizabeth A. Castelli with Rosamond C. Rodman, 119–45. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghissi, Haideh. 1999. Feminism and Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary. Stephen D. 1994. Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortlund, Raymond C. 1996. Whoredom: God’s Unfaithful Wife in Biblical Theology. New Studies in Biblical Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, Zakia, and Rajeswari Sunder Rajan. 2001. “Shabano.” In Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader, ed. Elizabeth A. Castelli with Rosamond C. Rodman, 195–215. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pippin, Tina. 1999. Apocalyptic Bodies: The Biblical End of the World in Text and Image. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pippin, Tina. 2002. “Of Gods and Demons: Blood Sacrifice and Eternal Life in Dracula and the Apocalypse of John.” In Screening Scripture: Intertextual Connections Between Scripture and Film, ed. George Aichele and Richard Walsh, 24–41. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinby, Lee. 1994. Anti-Apocalypse: Exercises in Genealogical Criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, Neal. 1980. “Covenant and the Federal Constitution.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 10(4): 135–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Pat. 1999. Interview by Cal Thomas. In Blinded by Might: Can the Religious Right Save America?, by Cal Thomas and Ed Dobson, 248–58. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Jerry and Dena. 2003. “God’s Plan for the End-Time Harvest,”http://www.planetkc.com/nnnel/GODS_PLAN.htm .

  • Runions, Erin. 2001. Changing Subjects: Gender, Nation and Future in Micah. Playing the Texts 7. London: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolinski, Reiner. 1999. “Apocalypticism in Colonial North America.” In Vol. 3 of The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, ed. Stephen J. Stein, Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age, 36–71. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanson, Anders. 1995. Manifest Destiny: American Expansionism and the Empire of Right. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Zohreh T. 1998. “Eluding the Feminist, Overthrowing the Modern? Transformations in Twentieth-Century.” In Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle East, ed. Lila Abu-Lughod, 215–42. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Stichele, Caroline. 2000. “Apocalypse, Art and Abjection: Images of the Great Whore.” In Culture, Entertainment and the Bible, ed. George Aichele, 124–38. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, Gore. 1993. “Armageddon?” In Gore Vidal: United States Essays1952–1992, 995–1006. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • A Voice in the Wilderness. 2003. “Iraq War: Gulf War II.”http://www.a-voice.org/main/iraq-war.htm. March.

  • Warrior, Robert Allen. 1991. “A Native American Perspective: Canaanites, Cowboys, and Indians.” In Voices from the Margin: Interpreting the Bible in the Third World, ed. R. S. Sugirtharajah, 287–95. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office,http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Hans Walter 1990 [1982]. Micah: A Commentary. Trans. Gary Stansell. Minneapolis: Augsburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth A. Castelli Janet R. Jakobsen

Copyright information

© 2004 Elizabeth A. Castelli and Janet R. Jakobsen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Runions, E. (2004). Biblical Promise and Threat in U.S. Imperialist Rhetoric, Before and After 9/11. In: Castelli, E.A., Jakobsen, J.R. (eds) Interventions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981561_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics