Skip to main content

Abstract

International Relations (IR) theory has benefited greatly from a growing interaction with political theory and philosophy over the last 20 years.1 Via postmodernism and the work of Foucault, Derrida, Rorty, and Lyotard continental theory has become an accepted part of theoretical discourse.2 The Frankfurt School Critical Theory, exemplified by the work of Habermas, has also carved out a significant niche.3 In International Political Economy (IPE), the work of Antonio Gramsci has inspired perhaps the most dynamic analysis of economic globalization, and certainly one with a powerful critical voice.4 Traditional stalwarts of political theory courses, such as Kant, Mill, and Bentham, have regained prominence via the democratic peace literature and issues such as cosmopolitan democracy and global citizenship.5 The revival of normative theory also owes a great deal to political theory and philosophy with both cosmopolitan and communitarian camps often identifying themselves with Kant and Hegel, respectively.6 Even realism, often seen as lacking in philosophical sophistication, has looked to its theoretical roots. This is most obvious in the use of neoclassical economic analogies and rational choice theory in neorealism, but has also involved a consideration of thinkers such as Carl Schmitt—adding the, admittedly problematic, weapon of the twentieth century’s most trenchant critic of liberalism to the armory of policy-oriented, problem-solving pragmatism.7

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Brian Schmidt, “Together Again: International Relations and Political Theory,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4, no. 1 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chris Brown, “International Political Theory: A British Social Science?” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2, no. 1 (2000). Throughout, IR will refer to the discipline of International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin Wight, “Why is There No International Theory?” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London: George, Allen and Unwin, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A search of Social Science citation indexes and databases suggests that only a tiny number of pieces using Arendt have appeared in international relations in recent years. The most notable include Anthony F. Lang, Jr. Agency and Ethics: The Politics of Military Intervention (Albany: SUNY Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Williams, Jr. Agency and Ethics: The Politics of Military Intervention (Albany: SUNY Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Williams, “Toleration, Territorial Borders and the English School,” Review of International Studies, 28, no. 4 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas Klusmeyer and Astri Suhrke, “Comprehending ‘Evil’: Challenges for Law and Policy,” Ethics & International Affairs, 16, no. 1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Saurette, “‘I Mistrust all Systematizers and Avoid Them’: Nietzsche, Arendt and the Crises of the Will to Order in International Relations Theory,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25, no. 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Those seeking a comprehensive introduction should consult Dana Villa (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quoted in Margaret Canovan, “Hannah Arendt as a Conservative Thinker,” in Larry May and Jerome Kohn (eds.), Hannah Arendt: Twenty Years Later (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parekh, Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy, 14–19. See also Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.g., Emanuel Adler, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, 3, no. 3 (1997): 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977), 8–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Robert Jackson argues that studying international politics should focus on the activities of elite power-holders, possibly as few as 1,000 in number. Robert H. Jackson, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 134.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a similar approach drawn more directly from a rational choice background, see Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Principles of International Politics: People’s Power, Preferences and Perceptions (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000) in which the author constructs a theory of world politics around the idea of individual leaders protecting their positions of power.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The most important account of this in IR focuses upon realism, but the points stand in relation to a wider body of work. John Vasquez, The Power of Power Politics, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. John Gerard Ruggie, “What Makes the World Hang Together: Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization, 52, no. 4 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arendt can thus be seen to contrast with a postmodern normative theory, like Cochran’s, that stresses the virtues of ontological minimalism. Molly Cochran, Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E.g., Andrew Linklater, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew Linklater, “The Questions of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical Theoretical Approach,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21, no. 1 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrew Linklater, “The Achievements of Critical Theory,” in Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Philip Hansen, Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a more recent, and even more pertinent example of the type of work Arendt’s plurality exposes, see Huntington, “The Hispanic Challenge,” Foreign Policy, 141 (March/April 2004): 30–45, in which he argues that the influx of Hispanics into the United States is challenging its core, Western identity.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hannah Arendt, “The Concept of History,” in Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future (New York: Penguin, 1977). For a general discussion of her account of “History and the Decline of Politics,” see Hansen, Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship, 14–49.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beate Jahn, “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Manifestation of Liberal Individualism,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27, no. 3 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hannah Arendt, “On Humanity in Dark Times: Thoughts about Lessing,” in Hannah Arendt (ed.), Men in Dark Times (London: Jonathan Cape, 1970), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hannah Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, New Edition with Added Prefaces (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973), 477.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (London: Faber and Faber, 1963), 279.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Faber and Faber, 1963), 247.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E.g., John Williams, “The Ethics of Borders and the Borders of Ethics: International Society and Rights and Duties of Special Beneficence,” Global Society, 13, no. 4 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (New York: Penguin Books, 1963), 141–178.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hannah Arendt (ed.), “Civil Disobedience,” in Crises of the Republic (San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1972), 49–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Anthony F. Lang Jr. John Williams

Copyright information

© 2005 Anthony F. Lang, Jr. and John Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, J., Lang, A.F. (2005). Introduction. In: Lang, A.F., Williams, J. (eds) Hannah Arendt and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981509_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics