Advertisement

Employment or Endowment? The Dilemma of Motherhood, 1890–1914

  • Ann Taylor Allen

Abstract

Legal equality was an important goal, but it meant little without economic independence. Mothers who depended on their male partners for their own subsistence and that of their children could hardly develop into autonomous individuals or responsible parents. Though women’s dependence and domestic servitude were age-old problems, the new century brought the hope of new solutions. In the mid-nineteenth century, when families were large, births were spaced throughout the woman’s reproductive period, and average female life expectancy was less than fifty years, motherhood might well be a lifetime task that excluded any other occupation. But at the turn of the twentieth century, changes in women’s lives called this traditional pattern into question. Must motherhood consume an entire life? Or was it a limited commitment that could coexist with other forms of work, including paid employment? For some, this latter possibility seemed to point the way to a more fully human existence, in which work might confer not only economic independence but also self-esteem. “What women who have fully thought out the position want, is not this forced alternative between activity in the human world, and control of their own economic position on the one hand, and marriage and children on the other, but both,” wrote the British socialist Mabel Atkinson in 1914. “Women do not want either love or work, but both, and the full meaning of the feminist movement will not develop until this demand becomes conscious and articulate among the rank and file of the movement.”1 This ideal of emancipation through a combination of family life and paid work would engage successive generations of feminists throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty-first.

Keywords

Married Woman Maternity Leave Maternal Employment Economic Independence Maternal Role 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    M.A. (Mabel Atkinson), The Economic Foundations of the Women’s Movement (London: Fabian Society, 1914), 18.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ute Gerhard, Unerhört!: Die Geschichte der deutschen Frauenbewegung (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1995), 148.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Helene Böhlau, Halbtier! (Berlin: Fontane, 1899), 298.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.G. Wells, Ann Veronica [1909] (London: J.M. Dent, 1993), 160–161.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    To name only a few of these works: Anne Cova, Maternité et droits des femmes en France: XIX-XXe siècles (Paris: Anthropos, 1997)Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Alisa Klaus, Every Child a Lion: The Origins of Maternal and Infant Health Policy in the United States and France, 1890–1920 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Gisela Bock and Pat Thane, eds., Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880s–1950s (London and New York: Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    Seth Koven and Sonya Michel, “Womanly Duties: Maternalist Policies and the Origins of Welfare States in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States, 1880–1920,” American Historical Review 95 (October 1990): 1076–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 5.
    Gisela Bock, “Poverty and Mothers’ Rights in the Emerging Welfare State,” in Georges Duby, Michelle Perrot, and Françoise Thébaud, eds., A History of Women in the West, Vol. 5, Toward a Cultural Identity in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Belknap, 1994), 402–431Google Scholar
  10. 5.
    Karen Offen, “Depopulation, Nationalism, and Feminism in Fin-de-Siècle France,” American Historical Review 89 (June 1984): 648–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 5.
    Elinor A. Accampo, Rachel G. Fuchs, and Mary Lynn Stewart, eds., Gender and the Politics of Social Reform in France, 1870–1914 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1995)Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    Susan Pedersen, Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France, 1914–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  13. 5.
    Gisela Bock, Frauen in der europäischen Geschichte von dem Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2000), 231–238.Google Scholar
  14. 6.
    Eleanor A. Accampo, “Gender, Social Policy, and the Formation of the Third Republic: An Introduction,” in Accampo, Fuchs, and Stewart, eds., Gender and the Politics of Social Reform 1–27;Joan Wallach Scott, “ ,‘ L’ouvrière! Mot impie, sordide.’ Women workers in the Discourse of French Political Economy,” in Joan Wallach Scott, Gender and the Politics of History (New York: Columbia, 1988), 139–163Google Scholar
  15. 6.
    Joan W. Scott, “The Woman Worker,” in A History of Women in the West, Vol. 4, Georges Duby, Geneviève Fraisse, and Michelle Perrot, eds., Emerging Feminism from Revolution to World War (Cambridge: Belknap, 1993), 399–426.Google Scholar
  16. 7.
    Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, “Système des contradictions économiques, où philosophie de la misère,” as excerpted and translated in Susan Groag Bell and Karen Offen, eds., Women, the Family and Freedom: the Debate in Documents, Vol. 1 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1983), 191.Google Scholar
  17. 8.
    Louise A. Tilly, Industrialization and Gender Inequality (Washington: American Historical Association, 1993), 1–14; Thane, “Visions of Gender in the Making of the British Welfare State: The Case of Women in the British Labour Party and Social Policy,” in Bock and Thane, eds., Maternity and Gender Policies 93–118.Google Scholar
  18. 9.
    John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women [1869], excerpted in Alice Rossi, ed., The Feminist Papers, From Adams to de Beauvoir (New York: Columbia University Press, 1973), 213.Google Scholar
  19. 10.
    Thomas Nipperdey, Deutsche Geschichte, 1866–1918: Arbeitswelt und Bürgergeist (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1990), 77; Pedersen, Family, Dependence 39, 77.Google Scholar
  20. 11.
    Ellen Ross, “Mothers and the State in Britain, 1904–1914,” in John R. Gillis, Louise A. Tilly, and David Levine, eds., The European Experience of Declining Fertility: The Quiet Revolution (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992), 48–65 (quotation 53).Google Scholar
  21. 12.
    Friedrich Naumann, “Die Frauen im neuen Wirtschaftsvolke,” Mutterschutz 2 (1906): 133–149 (quotation 133).Google Scholar
  22. 13.
    Kathleen Canning, Languages of Labor and Gender: Female Factory Work in Germany 1850–1914 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), 170–217.Google Scholar
  23. 15.
    S.R. Steinmetz, “Feminismus und Rasse,” Jahrbuch für Sozialwissenschaften 7 (1904): 751–758 (quotation 763).Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    Elisabeth Schneider, ed., Die verheiratete Lehrerin: Verhandlungen der ersten Internationalen Lehrerinnen-Versammlung in Deutschland (Berlin: Hermann Walther, 1905), 16.Google Scholar
  25. 18.
    Alice Salomon, Charakter ist Schicksal: Lebenserinnerungen (Weinheim: Beltz Verlag, 1983), 49.Google Scholar
  26. 20.
    Aletta Jacobs, Memories: My Life as an International Leader in Health, Suffrage and Peace (New York: Feminist Press, 1996), 120.Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    Lily Braun, Memoiren einer Sozialistin: Kampfbahre (Munich: Albert Langen Verlag, 1909), 226.Google Scholar
  28. 22.
    Elinor Accampo, “Private Life, Public Image: Motherhood and Militancy in the Self-Construction of Nelly Roussel, 1900–1922,” in Jo Burr Margadant, ed., The New Biography: Performing Femininity in Nineteenth-Century France (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000), 218–261 (quotation 237).Google Scholar
  29. 23.
    Kathleen Canning, “Gender and the Politics of Class Formation,” in Geoff Eley, ed., Society, Culture and the State in Germany (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1996), 105–142 (quotation 135).Google Scholar
  30. 25.
    Lily Braun, “Einleitung,” in Adele Schreiber, ed., Mutterschaft: Ein Sammelwerk für die Probleme des Weibes als Mutter (Munich: Albert Langen Verlag, 1912), 1–4 (quotation 2); translated as “Introduction to Motherhood,” in Selected Writings on Feminism and Socialism, trans. and ed. Alfred G. Meyer (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987), 112.Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    Mona Caird, The Morality of Marriage and other Essays on the Status and Destiny of Women (London: E. Redway, 1897), 132; see also Pedersen, Family, Dependence 25–78.Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    Charlotte Perkins Gilman, De economische toestand der vrouw: een studie over de economische verhouding tusschen mannen en vrouwen als een factor in dem sociale evolutie, trans. Aletta H. Jacobs (Haarlem: H.D. Tjenk Willink, 1900)Google Scholar
  33. 29.
    Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Mann und Frau: Die wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen der Geschlechter als Hauptfaktor, trans. Marie Stritt (Leipzig: Heinrich Minden, 1901).Google Scholar
  34. 30.
    Susan Zimmermann, Die bessere Hälfte? Frauenbewegungen und Frauenbestrebungen im Ungarn der Habsburgermonarchie 1848 his 1918 (Vienna and Budapest: Promedia, 1999), 283–295Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    Mrs. Pember Reeves, Ethel Vaughan-Sawyer, Mrs. Spence Weiss, Mrs. Bartrick Baker, Mrs. Stansbury, Mrs. S.K. Ratliffe, Miss B.L. Hutchins, and Mrs. O’Brien Harris, eds., Summary of Eight Papers and Discussions upon the Disabilities of Mothers as Workers (n.p.: Fabian Women’s Group, 1910), 22–24.Google Scholar
  36. 32.
    Marie Stritt, ed., Der internationale Frauen-Kongress in Berlin 1904 (Berlin: Carl Habel, 1904), 405.Google Scholar
  37. 33.
    Lily Braun, Frauenarbeit und Hauswirtschaft (Berlin: Verlag Expedition der Buchhandlung Vorwärts, 1901)Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution [1898], Introduction by Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998), 76–121; Schreiner, Woman and Labour 33–68.Google Scholar
  39. 33.
    On Lily Braun see Jean Quataert, Reluctant Feminsts: Women in German Social Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
  40. 33.
    on Schreiner’s life and work see Ruth First and Ann Scott, Olive Schreiner: A Biography (London: The Women’s Press, 1980), 265–297.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    Lily Braun, Die Frauenfrage: ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung und ihre wirtschaftliche Seite (Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1901), 286.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    Schneider, ed., Die verheiratete Lehrerin; see also James C. Albisetti, Schooling German Girls and Women: Secondary and Higher Education in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 175–178.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    Pember Reeves et al., eds., Summary of Eight Papers, 19; for a summary of this discussion, see Carol Dyhouse, Feminism and the Family in England, 1880–1939 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989), 54–106.Google Scholar
  44. 40.
    Ulla Wikander, “ ,‘ Some Kept the Flag of Feminist Demands Waving’: Debates at International Conferences on Protecting Women Workers,” in Ulla Wikander, Alice Kessler- Harris, and Jane Lewis, eds., Protecting Women: Labor Legislation in Europe, the United States and Australia, 1880–1920 (Urbana, IL: University Of Illinois Press, 1995), 29–62.Google Scholar
  45. 41.
    Ulla Jansz, “Women or Workers? The 1889 Labor Law and the Debate on Protective Legislation in the Netherlands,” in Wikander et al., eds., Protecting Women 188–209, plus many other articles in this useful volume.Google Scholar
  46. 42.
    Mary Lynn Stewart, Women, Work and the French State: Labour Protection and Social Patriarchy, 1879–1919 (Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press, 1989), 178–179.Google Scholar
  47. 51.
    Teresa Kulawik, Wohlfahrtsstaat und Mutterschaft: Schweden und Deutschland, 1870–1912 (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1999), 289.Google Scholar
  48. 53.
    Schwimmer, “Wichtige Momente,” 379–383; Gerda Neyer, “Die Entwicklung des Mutterschutzes in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz von 1877 bis 1945,” in Ute Gerhard, ed., Frauen in der Geschichte des Rechts von der frühen Neuzeit bis zur Gegenwart (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1997), 744–758.Google Scholar
  49. 55.
    See Alice Salomon, “Das Problem der Mutterschaftsversicherung,” Die Frau 12 (September 1902): 722–732Google Scholar
  50. 55.
    Henriette Fürth, Die Fabrikarbeit verheirateter Frauen (Frankfurt am Main: Eduard Schnapper, 1902), 202; Karin Hausen, “Arbeiterinnenschutz, Mutterschutz und gesetzliche Krankenversicherung im Deutschen Kaiserreich und in der Weimarer Republik: Zur Funktion von Arbeits- und Sozialrecht für die Normierung und Stablisierung der Geschlechterverhältnisse,” in Gerhard, ed., Frauen in der Geschichte des Rechts 759–771.Google Scholar
  51. 56.
    BAK, Nachlass Adele Schreiber, Vol. 29; the petition is reprinted in Helene Stöcker, ed., Petitionen des Deutschen Bundes für Mutterschutz (Berlin: Geschäftsstelle des Bundes für Mutterschutz, 1916), 9–12Google Scholar
  52. 56.
    and in translation in Eleanor S. Riemer and John C. Fout, eds., European Women: A Documentary History (New York: Schocken, 1980), 168–170Google Scholar
  53. 56.
    see also Ann Taylor Allen, “Mothers of the New Generation: Helene Stocker, Adele Schreiber, and the Evolution of a German Idea of Motherhood, 1900–1914,” Signs 10 (Spring 1985): 418–438 (quotation 429); Bock, “Poverty and Mothers’ Rights.”Google Scholar
  54. 62.
    Namur en dwaling, Evolutie January 9, 1901; Ulla Jansz, Denken over sekse in de eerste feministische golf (Amsterdam:Sara/van Gennep, 1990), 163–169.Google Scholar
  55. 63.
    Dyhouse, Feminism and the Family, 118–119; Kevin Repp, Reformers, Critics, and the Paths of German Modernity: Anti-Politics and the Search for Alternatives, 1890–1914 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000), 287–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 64.
    Ernestine Federn, “Die Einküchenhäuser in Berlin,” Der Bund (June 1909): 8–10 (quotation 9).Google Scholar
  57. 66.
    Ada Nield Chew, “The Economic Freedom of Women,” The Freewoman (July 18, 1912): 52.Google Scholar
  58. 68.
    Valeria Babini, “Science, Feminism and Education: The Early Work of Maria Montessori,” History Workshop (1999): 44–57Google Scholar
  59. 68.
    Rita Kramer, Maria Montessori: A Biography (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988), 93–94.Google Scholar
  60. 69.
    Maria Montessori, The Secret of Childhood [1936] trans. M. Joseph Costelloe, S.J. (New York: Ballantine, 1966), 120.Google Scholar
  61. 73.
    Madeleine Pelletier, L’Émancipation sexuelle de la femme (Paris: Giard and Brière, 1911), 33.Google Scholar
  62. Braun, Memoiren einer Sozialistin Vol. 2, 396–398; Anna-E. Freier, Dem Reich der Freiheit sollst Du Kinder gebären: Der Antifeminismus der proletarischen Frauenbewegung im Spiegel der “Gleichheit,” 1891–1917 (Frankfurt am Main: Haag und Herchen, 1981), 53–65.Google Scholar
  63. 75.
    Edmund Fischer, “Die Frauenfrage,” Sozialistische Monatshefte 9 (1905): 258–265 (quotation 265)Google Scholar
  64. 75.
    Edmund Fischer, “Die Familie,” Sozialistische Monatshefte 9 (1905): 535–539 (quotation 538).Google Scholar
  65. 76.
    Jeanne Schmahl, Economic domestique (Paris: C. Larny, 1901), 15.Google Scholar
  66. 77.
    Ellen Key, Mißbrauchte Frauenkraft trans. Therese Krüger (Paris: n.p., 1898), 6.Google Scholar
  67. 78.
    Ellen Key, The Renaissance of Motherhood, trans. Anna E.B. Fries (New York and London: G.B. Putnam, 1914), 121.Google Scholar
  68. 79.
    Ellen Key, Über Liebe und Ehe: Essays, trans. Francis Maro (Berlin: S. Fischer, 1906), 436–440.Google Scholar
  69. 84.
    Gertrud Bäumer, Die Frau in der Kulturbewegung der Gegenwart (Wiesbaden: J.F. Bergmann, 1904), 31. For other responses to Key, seeGoogle Scholar
  70. 84.
    Tuna Kinnunen, “ ,‘ Eine der unseren’ und ,‘ Königin im neuen Reiche der Frau’: Die Rezeption Ellen Keys in der Frauenbewegung des deutschen Kaiserreichs,” Ph.D. diss, University of Tampere, Finland, 2000; and Kinnunen, “Eine ,‘ grosse Mutter’ und ihre Töchter: Ellen Key und die duetsche Frauenbewegung,” in Meike Sophia Baader, Juliane Jacobi, and Sabine Andreesen, eds., Ellen Keys reformpcidagogische Vison: “Das Jahrhudert des Kindes” und seine Wirkung (Weinheim and Basel: Beltz Verlag, 2000), 64–80.Google Scholar
  71. 85.
    Gertrud Bäumer, Die Frau in volkswirtschaft und Staatsleben der Gegenwart (Stuttgart and Berlin: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1914), 281.Google Scholar
  72. 89.
    Pauline Kergomard, L’Éducation maternelle dans l’école (Paris: Hachette, 1892), 2.Google Scholar
  73. 90.
    Paul Strauss, Dépopulation etpuériculture (Paris: E. Fasquelle, 1901), 280.Google Scholar
  74. 91.
    Wally Zepler, “Das Mutterschaftsproblem” [1906], rpt., in Gisela Brinkler-Gabler, ed., Frauenarbeit und Beruf (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1979), 284–295 (quotation 287).Google Scholar
  75. 92.
    Hedwig Dohm, “Gesichtspunkte für die Erziehung für die Ehe,” Sozialistische Monatshefte (1909): 639–645.Google Scholar
  76. 94.
    Linda L. Clark, Schooling the Daughters of Marianne: Textbooks and the Socialization of Girls in Modern French Primary Schools (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1984), 83–84; Klaus, Every Child a Lion 81.Google Scholar
  77. 95.
    Adolphe Pinard, La Puériculture (Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1904) (quotation 125).Google Scholar
  78. 96.
    Anna Davin, “Imperialism and Motherhood,” History Workshop 5 (1978): 9–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. On the Pestalozzi-Froebel Haus, see, Arbeitsgruppe “Geschichte des Pestalozzi-Froebel-Hauses,” ed., Das Pestalozzi-Froebel Haus: Fachschule für Pcidagogik, Berlin (Berlin: Pestalozzi-Froebel Haus, 1991).Google Scholar
  80. 97.
    Marianne Hainisch, Frauenarbeit (Vienna: Hugo Heller, 1911), 25Google Scholar
  81. 97.
    Käthe Schirmacher, “Die Frauenarbeit im Hause: Ihre ökonomische, rechtliche und sociale Wertung” [1905], rpt., in Brinider-Gabler, ed., Frauenarbeit und Beruf 256–275.Google Scholar
  82. 100.
    Hubertine Auclert, “La fonction maternelle rétribuée” [1914], in Hubertine Auclert, Les Femmes au gouvernail (Paris: Marcel Giard, 1923), 307–316 (quotation 309).Google Scholar
  83. 102.
    Robert Talmy, Histoire du mouvement familial en France, 1896–1899 Vol. 1 (Aubenas Union nationale des Caisses d’Allocations Familiales, 1962), 66–98Google Scholar
  84. 102.
    Jacques Bertillon, De la Dépopulation de la France et des remèdes à y apporter (Nancy: Berger-Levrault, 1896), 26; Cova, Maternité et droits des femmes 29–120.Google Scholar
  85. 105.
    Marilyn Boxer, “French Socialism, Feminism and the Family,” Troisième République 3–4 (Spring-Fall 1977): 128–167 (quotation 143)Google Scholar
  86. 105.
    Léonie Rouzade, Développement du Programme de la Société ,‘ L’Union des Femmes’ par la Citoyenne Rouzade, 13 Avril 1880 (Paris: L’Union des Femmes, 1880); see also BMD, dossier Léonie Rouzade.Google Scholar
  87. 106.
    Léonie Rouzade, Petit catéchisme de morale, laïque et socialiste (Meudon: en vente chez l’auteur, 1904).Google Scholar
  88. 107.
    Nelly Roussel, “Féminisme et Fécondité,”Le Rappel October 19, 1900.Google Scholar
  89. 110.
    H.G. Wells, Socialism and the Family (London: A.C. Fifield, 1906), 3.Google Scholar
  90. 112.
    Ida Blom, “Voluntary Motherhood 1900–1930: Theories and Politics of a Norwegian Feminist in an International Perspective,” in Bock and Thane, eds., Maternity and Gender Policies 21–39.Google Scholar
  91. 116.
    Just Sicard de Plauzoles, La Maternité et la defense contre la dépopulation (Paris: Giard et Brière, 1909), 250.Google Scholar
  92. 117.
    Yvonne Kniebiehler, L’Histoire des mères, du moyen-age â nos jours (Paris: Editions Montalba, 1980), 296–297.Google Scholar
  93. 117.
    Cf. Jacques Donzelot, The Policing of Families, trans. Robert Hurley (New York: Pantheon Books, 1979), 45–47.Google Scholar
  94. 122.
    Jeanne Oddo-Deflou, ed., Congrès national des droits civils et du suffrage des femmes (Paris, 1908), 53; see also Fonds Camille Béllilon, in Fonds Bouglé, Bibliothèque Historique, Paris.Google Scholar
  95. 125.
    Anna Maria Mozzoni, “I socialisti e l’emanzipazione della donna” [ 1892 ], in Anna Maria Mozzoni, La Liberazione della Donna, ed. Franca Pieroni Bortolotti (Milan: Gabriele Mazzotta, 1975), 213.Google Scholar
  96. 127.
    The Spinster, By One, The Freewoman, November 23, 1911; see also Lucy Bland, Banishing the Beast: Sexuality and the Early Feminists (New York: The New Press, 1995), 282.Google Scholar
  97. 130.
    Adele Gerhard and Helene Simon, Mutterschaft und geistige Arbeit: Eine psychologische und soziologische Studie auf Grundlage einer internationalen Erhebung mit Berücksichtigung der geschichtlichen Entwicklung (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1908), 321.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ann Taylor Allen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Taylor Allen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations